23 measurements spanning 29 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,785–10,827 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Sept 2026, 10:21
10,812
-10
4 Sept 2026, 00:55
10,822
+5
2 Sept 2026, 14:28
10,817
+2
1 Sept 2026, 14:03
10,815
+3
31 Aug 2026, 12:44
10,812
+5
30 Aug 2026, 10:13
10,807
+1
29 Aug 2026, 11:27
10,806
+2
28 Aug 2026, 11:36
10,804
+3
27 Aug 2026, 08:37
10,801
+2
26 Aug 2026, 11:04
10,799
+5
25 Aug 2026, 11:32
10,794
-3
24 Aug 2026, 09:56
10,797
+7
22 Aug 2026, 17:28
10,790
-3
21 Aug 2026, 04:56
10,793
-1
19 Aug 2026, 06:11
10,794
+1
18 Aug 2026, 06:22
10,793
-2
17 Aug 2026, 09:38
10,795
-6
15 Aug 2026, 16:48
10,801
-5
14 Aug 2026, 04:57
10,806
-3
13 Aug 2026, 00:37
10,809
first reading
Engagement
30 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
23.5%
avg views ÷ 10,812 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,540
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 30 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held
30 (13 July 2026 – 31 August 2026)
Views total
40,660
Reactions total
1,006
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
1 Sept 2026, 20:10 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
49m 28s
Average length
2m 28s
Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,695 reactions across 30 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
887
52.3%
👍
515
30.4%
❤
222
13.1%
⚡
41
2.42%
👏
20
1.18%
❤🔥
3
0.177%
🐳
3
0.177%
💯
1
0.059%
😁
1
0.059%
😱
1
0.059%
🙏
1
0.059%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,695 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 30 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tttolmachev. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 30 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 July 2026 to 31 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Тело не слушается: первый мандраж Маши
В эту субботу мы с Машей поехали на её второй турнир. После первого мы разобрали всё, что тогда не получилось: подтянули приём, усилили атаку, поиграли товарищеских встреч в зале, чтобы наработанное успело переехать из упражнений в игру. Старые дыры закрыли и поехали в бой уже с другим багажом.
Но турнир — это не просто зал с другими столами. Там всё то же самое проверяется на…
Недавно у Gewo вышли новые накладки Inventus XT Pro, и так как последний год я играю именно Gewo, то решил их попробовать.
По заявлениям фирмы у накладок более цепкий топшит и мяч вылетает дальше. Ценник, конечно, относительно других накладок тоже выше.
Что в итоге? Накладки оказались хуже, чем те, которыми я играл до этого, — Nexxus Pro EL Hard. Во-первых, более сильного зацепа там не оказалось: может, первые 2-3 …
Все знают, как сложно устроен наш мозг. И, поверьте, настольный теннис устроен не проще. Беда в том, что эти два друга далеко не сразу начинают дружить между собой — у любителей это происходит постоянно: голова никак не может договориться с руками и ногами.
И это, поверьте, самое лёгкое, что есть в настольном теннисе.
Настоящие сложности начинаются, когда добавляются вращения. А приём подач ломает голову окончатель…
Первые три из шести деталей, по которым читается подача
Знание какой-то одной подачи сильно ограничивает игрока. Но когда он понимает, на какие детали смотреть во время приёма, всё встаёт на свои места.
Всего таких деталей шесть. Разберу первые три — те, что работают ещё до того, как мяч полетел в вашу сторону.
Первое, с чего начинается игра, — это то, как соперник встал за стол. У каждой подачи своё исходное поло…
Дёрганья, перенапряжение и зажатость в ударах
Одна из самых частых проблем у любителей старшего поколения — резкий тычок в мяч. Без разницы, под каким углом мяч летит и что вообще происходит на столе.
В момент контакта создаётся максимальное напряжение, рука зажимается, и мяч вылетает без контроля — как из пушки. Попал — победа. Но попадаешь всегда резко, и сыграть тонко, коротко, обработать мяч хоть сколько-нибудь…
Один из ключевых навыков на приёме подач — наблюдательность.
Когда соперник только занимает стартовое положение, большую часть информации уже можно считать.
Какая будет подача, примерно с каким вращением и в каком направлении.
Самый явный показатель вращения — углы ракетки.
Многие любители неосознанно ставят её под каждую подачу по-разному. Это первый сигнал.
Второй сигнал — под каким углом идёт контакт. Здесь о…
Матч решается на первых трёх мячах
Как бы хорошо вы ни делали удары, как бы стабильно ни попадали на стол — всё это ломается в мгновение ока, когда начинается игра на счёт.
Потому что игра строится из подачи и приёма. И в этот момент два игрока сталкиваются в битве интеллектов и навыков.
Плохая подача — удобная по направлению, слабая по вращению, читаемая по длине — сразу отдаёт преимущество тому, кто умеет приним…
Готовлю новый мастер-класс по приёму подач
Друзья, честно: приём — это то место, где у большинства любителей всё и сыпется. Подачу можно поставить за месяц. С приёмом люди мучаются годами и продолжают гадать, куда полетит мяч.
Меня какое-то время не было. Периодически от ведения каналов выгораю так, что потом не могу ничего писать 😅 Поначалу жутко бесило, но я смирился и гордо ждал, когда моя теннисная поэтесса вер…
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @tttolmachev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“НАСТОЛЬНЫЙ ТЕННИС | TT_TOLMACHEV” (@tttolmachev), 10,812 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tttolmachev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
