Channel
@tuctech
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
57subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002833308621 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tuctech |
| Created | 12 July 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tuctech |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:35 | 57 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:17 | 58 | +2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 09:16 | 56 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:08 | 57 | +5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 52 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:30 | 52 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:00 | 53 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 12 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
34 reactions across 6 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15 | 44.1% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 11.8% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 5.88% | |
| 🍌 | 2 | 5.88% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 5.88% | |
| 😡 | 2 | 5.88% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 2.94% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 2.94% | |
| 👻 | 1 | 2.94% | |
| 😈 | 1 | 2.94% | |
| 🤷♂ | 1 | 2.94% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 2.94% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 2.94% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2025 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tuctech. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 July 2025 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Nubia Z40S Pro Заказал вчера это крассавчика за 14к рублей в фулл идеале и топ комплектом, тут стоит сочный снап 8+ Gen 1 который известен как брат 8г1, но с исправленным нагревом и энергоэффективностью + слабый тротлинг, сочными модулями камер - тот самый момент когда на борту за 14к тебя приветствует сонька 787 с ois, норм запасом МП, и знакомым для нас 35мм фокуса, средним телевиком на Уровне Samsung S22 ultra, и…
Signed 2ровой
Oneplus 11 Представляет собой по характеристикам очень вкусную бибику, норм проц, камера хасселбляdi, и цена на авито от 15к... И где подвох? Подвоха нет, просто это сладкий телефончик за свою цену, лучше любой бюджетки в 5 раз и более, который не греется, камеры на уровне 13-14 айфончика, все как надо, наш друг, наш кент, не мент Вы бы отсосали ему? ❤️ — Да конечно, я вся его 😡 — Соси письку
❤4😡2🍌1
Signed 2ровой
Мегапиксели маркетинг? 🪄 вы знали что мегапиксели - это просто размер картинки в точках? и по логике: 📸 чем больше точек, тем круче фото... но это не так... 🤓 тебе на практике хватит 12–50 МП за глаза. дальше — просто цифры для рекламы. ❓ почему, ярый вопрос естественно, ведь чем больше точек тем четче? 👀 смотри, я производитель и могу сделать телефон хоть на 300 МП, но снимки всё равно будут мыльными и корявыми? …
⚡2❤2🍌1👎1👻1🔥1🤷♂1🫡1
Signed 2ровой
Oneplus 10R Субфлагман, вкусный причём, дизайн смехотворный... но... что то в нем есть, автономность под 6 часов и если он китаец Ace то зарядка в 160W, довольно неплохое наполнение, камера вкусная и видеосъемка не подкачала, смак, ещё 2 года точно проживёт) и причём каждые 3 года надо менять его мелкий 4500mAh акб Богоподобное устройство 😍
🔥3👏2
Signed 2ровой
Oneplus 10 pro Самый известный телефон ванплас после бума гиков в сфере смартфонов, телефон имеет на борту горячую печку 8г1 и неплохие модули - но в 9 про мне кажется они лучше но это субъективно), дизайн вышел мягко говоря уродом, по возможностям даже сейчас является сверх мобилой, но автономность даже в сравнении 9 про ничтожна мала (до 4 часа 27 минут по недавним тестам моего товарища, 89% акб) Следующий год и …
❤3
Signed 2ровой
OnePlus 9 pro Телефон компании ванплас выпущенный в далёком 2021 году, на ровне с S21 Ultra и 13 айфоном, и даже тогда он обошёл своих кентов по всем показателям (по нагреву тоже), телефон из себя представлял баланс универсал, имел отличные камеры, хорошую эргономика, приятный дизайн и шуструю работу, а также сочная вибрация и передовые технологии Данный телефон в 2026 году является все ещё не плохим устройством в …
❤3🥰1
Signed 2ровой
➕TucTech INFO➕ @tucot — Владелец канала, по всем вопросам к нему Канал посвящён ТехноБлогу, здесь обсуждаются различные темы, обзоры смартфонов, оценка, помощь с подбором, рассказы о технологиях и личные мнения, все что написано в канале является субъективным мнением автора и оно может отличатьчя от вашего. Обо мне: Азамат 18 лет Основное Устройство Honor magic 6 pro
❤3🍓1😈1
Signed 2ровой
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @tuctech. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TucTech” (@tuctech), 57 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tuctech.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.