Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Tuffstuffcom

Channel

Tuffstuffcom

@tuffstufftelega

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

12,243subscribers

-18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001200291926
TypeChannel
Username@tuffstufftelega
Created7 May 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tuffstufftelega

Growth

12,24312,26912,2567 August 2026 — 12,261 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,261 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,260 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,259 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,257 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,262 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,267 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,266 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,261 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,265 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,268 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,269 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,264 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,260 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,258 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,251 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,252 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,246 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,249 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,250 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,245 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,243 subscribers7 August 20262 September 2026
22 measurements spanning 26 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,239–12,273 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 18:2312,243-2
1 Sept 2026, 14:4312,245-5
30 Aug 2026, 15:0712,250+1
29 Aug 2026, 12:1712,249+3
28 Aug 2026, 10:0412,246-6
27 Aug 2026, 06:3612,252+1
26 Aug 2026, 06:5512,251-7
25 Aug 2026, 05:0912,258-2
24 Aug 2026, 03:0812,260-4
22 Aug 2026, 12:5312,264-5
21 Aug 2026, 00:2212,269+1
17 Aug 2026, 23:3512,268+3
16 Aug 2026, 21:0712,265+4
14 Aug 2026, 02:1412,261-5
12 Aug 2026, 22:2612,266-1
11 Aug 2026, 20:3412,267+5
10 Aug 2026, 23:4412,262+5
9 Aug 2026, 20:3112,257-2
8 Aug 2026, 23:0112,259-1
7 Aug 2026, 19:3512,260first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.3%
avg views ÷ 12,243 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,610
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.825%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held15 (10 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total23,520
Reactions total194
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 22:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
7,740
Videos
238
Links
214

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
31s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

361 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
18250.4%
🔥7320.2%
💔308.31%
😁215.82%
🤩205.54%
👍184.99%
😱123.32%
👎41.11%
🎉10.277%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 361 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 14:22 UTC≈1,050 views11 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Oh, Cartier, you’re wild. 🐆 Cartier снова выпускает свой зверинец — только вместо клетки здесь бриллианты, изумруды, оникс и платина. Faune & Flore de Cartier превращает природу в мир высокого ювелирного искусства: пантеры, змеи, птицы, рептилии и даже карпы выполнены с тончайшим вкусом. Но главное — здесь не пытаются приручить природу. Звери остаются хищными, свободными и немного опасными.

6🔥4🤩1

31 Aug 2026, 13:14 UTC≈1,720 views18 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Джон Гальяно отказался от посвященной лично ему выставки Met. С глубокой печалью я сообщаю, что в данный момент лучше отказаться от выставки.

💔11😱6👍1

28 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC≈2,860 views30 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Наглядный ответ на вопрос: удобные ли новые туфли от Celine🏀

🔥1510👍4🤩1

27 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC≈2,530 views17 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Скончалась легендарная Яёи Кусама. Еще задолго до эпохи бесконечных коллабораций она превратила искусство в одежду, а моду — в арт-объект 🎨

💔17

25 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC≈2,640 views20 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Сразу в вишлист! Сандалии LOEWE для внимательных 🥬 Пряжки складываются в название модного дома!

12👍4🔥4

21 Aug 2026, 12:42 UTC≈3,640 views23 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

К вопросу о линейках, было решено, что за этот транспортир можно было бы продать душу😅🫠

11😁7🔥5

21 Aug 2026, 12:17 UTC≈2,650 views11 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Лучшая новость этой пятницы: у Toteme появилась полноценная мужская коллекция! Бежим на сайт знакомиться с линейкой🧐

6👍2🎉1💔1🔥1

13 Aug 2026, 15:41 UTC≈3,160 views28 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Новинка от Louis Vuitton, которую точно не увидишь в бутике! Singer Vehicle Design и Louis Vuitton разработали два уникальных Porsche 964. Classic Turbo — светлый 964 Cabriolet с интерьером в духе классических моторных лодок. Classic — купе в архивных цветах LV и с кожаной отделкой. А в довесок — полноценный travel kit от Louis Vuitton: одежда, часы, обувь, шлем и кастомный багаж, включая решения для лыж и сёрфбо

20🔥8

5 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC≈3,270 views36 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Звание «туфли недели», определенно, уходит парам от Prada🪶

22🔥8🤩6

3 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC≈3,190 views31 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Video

Вот так и хочется провести остаток лета: играя в нарды Santos в часах Tank от Cartier🎲

22🔥5👍2🤩2

22 Jul 2026, 09:27 UTC≈4,520 views20 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Photo

Сходим с ума от цветов и новых босоножек на танкетке от Hermes🌰

9🔥6🤩4💔1

14 Jul 2026, 16:10 UTC≈4,070 views25 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Слухи подтвердились: Оливье Рустен возглавил Rabanne. После 14 лет в Balmain и бесконечных армированных жакетов Рустен приходит в дом, который последние 13 лет Жюльен Доссена методично превращал в один из самых умных и желанных брендов французской моды. Первую коллекцию увидим уже в марте. Назначение выглядит скорее ставкой на масштаб, чем на дизайн. Рустен умеет делать из модного дома поп-культурное событие и комм

14😱6👎4🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @tuffstufftelega. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Tuffstuffcom” (@tuffstufftelega), 12,243 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tuffstufftelega.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.