Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TulisAds 🖊

Channel

TulisAds 🖊

@tulisadscom

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

28,308subscribers

-377 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001437082255
TypeChannel
Username@tulisadscom
Description1 tip marketing setiap hari untuk usahawan semua daripada TulisAds
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tulisadscom

Growth

28,30828,68528,496.57 August 2026 — 28,685 subscribers8 August 2026 — 28,685 subscribers8 August 2026 — 28,683 subscribers9 August 2026 — 28,666 subscribers10 August 2026 — 28,644 subscribers11 August 2026 — 28,624 subscribers12 August 2026 — 28,615 subscribers13 August 2026 — 28,609 subscribers14 August 2026 — 28,594 subscribers16 August 2026 — 28,562 subscribers17 August 2026 — 28,543 subscribers18 August 2026 — 28,520 subscribers19 August 2026 — 28,496 subscribers20 August 2026 — 28,476 subscribers21 August 2026 — 28,465 subscribers23 August 2026 — 28,451 subscribers24 August 2026 — 28,419 subscribers25 August 2026 — 28,404 subscribers26 August 2026 — 28,384 subscribers27 August 2026 — 28,368 subscribers28 August 2026 — 28,358 subscribers29 August 2026 — 28,348 subscribers30 August 2026 — 28,334 subscribers31 August 2026 — 28,323 subscribers1 September 2026 — 28,308 subscribers7 August 20261 September 2026
25 measurements spanning 25 days, net -377. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,251–28,742 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 19:1528,308-15
31 Aug 2026, 17:5528,323-11
30 Aug 2026, 18:1928,334-14
29 Aug 2026, 18:2428,348-10
28 Aug 2026, 18:2428,358-10
27 Aug 2026, 17:0528,368-16
26 Aug 2026, 13:4228,384-20
25 Aug 2026, 15:5228,404-15
24 Aug 2026, 16:0328,419-32
23 Aug 2026, 02:5328,451-14
21 Aug 2026, 13:4528,465-11
20 Aug 2026, 14:2428,476-20
19 Aug 2026, 17:0628,496-24
18 Aug 2026, 19:3528,520-23
17 Aug 2026, 18:5328,543-19
16 Aug 2026, 13:4628,562-32
14 Aug 2026, 21:4528,594-15
13 Aug 2026, 13:0828,609-6
12 Aug 2026, 10:5828,615-9
11 Aug 2026, 14:1628,624first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 10 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.75%
avg views ÷ 28,308 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,060
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.066%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 28 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held28 (10 November 202527 August 2026)
Views total8,487
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 21:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
314
Videos
31
Links
757

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 1 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

78 reactions across 20 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5874.4%
👍1721.8%
🔥33.85%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 10 November 2025 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 14:51 UTC667 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Kalau tengok gambar ni, disember kan? Harini baru nak beli. 8… 9 bulan kemudian baru nak beli. Bayangkan. Berapa ribu kali iklan lalu dekat dia. Baru dia nak beli. Mesej simple je: “Never stop advertising”. Orang bukan tak nak beli. Cuma belum waktunya lagi. Kumpulkan / susun pelbagai jenis umat yang akan nampak mesej kita. Either yang beli harini, esok, ataupun tahun depan. So akhirnya, kolam pembeli kit

26 Aug 2026, 00:42 UTC824 views1 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Saya perasan satu benda: Meta dia sequence cara audien tengok ads. Especially kalau ada banyak ads. Ali dan Chong takkan nampak ad pertama yang sama. Mungkin Ali nampk video dulu. Mungkin Chong nampak static ads dulu. Mungkin Chong nampak iklan hardsell. Ali mungkin nampak iklan customer story dulu. Setiap orang journey nya berbeza. Bagi Meta banyak iklan untuk dia “kerjakan” audien anda. Lagi banyak jenis,

🔥1

25 Aug 2026, 10:44 UTC846 views1 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Kalau saya tunjuk ni, apa yang tuan puan faham? Seminit lebih je orang dah habis membeli? Logik ke? Dia tak terfikir apa2? Maksudnya orang masuk website tu dah decide nak beli, scroll dan beli. Apa yang saya nak cakap ni? Maksudnya website hanyalah final confirmation sahaja. Bukan dalam website tu orang meyakinkan diri dia untuk membeli. Apa ayat anda guna. Apa video. Apa imej yang anda guna. Itu yang jadi SEB

1

23 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC≈1,050 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Customer journey. Bayangkan kalau tak tanya customer. Kita tak tahu pun macam mana dia bergerak. Rupanya dah lama nampak ad, baru nak tergerak hati nak tanya. Jangan malas nak tanya, “awak tahu saya dari mana?” Daripada situ nampak customer datang dari mana. Bolehlah agak2 mana nak usaha lebih. - Abdul Rahman @ Tulis Ads Https://tulisads.com

19 Aug 2026, 10:05 UTC≈1,470 views1 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Random question saya dapat tadi: "Yang kat website Tulis Ads ni Ini Tulis Ads ke?" Bukannn. Ini beberapa custom GPT yang saya gunakan as a workflow kerja saya. Ada beberapa step. So akhirnya tuan puan akan dapat output. Contoh lah jual Myvi baru. Apa yang perlu ada? Kita perlu ada audience diversity. Apa benda tu? "Poket of audience" tersendiri. Setiap produk ada. Macam saya pernah cerita pasal setiap ora

1

19 Aug 2026, 06:19 UTC≈1,150 viewsread 1 September 2026

Kalau kita penjual. Kita memang akan fikir sebagai penjual. Jarang kita fikir "apa user lalu sebelum beli" Terbalik. Kena paksa diri. Sebab tu kalau buat bahan tu kena pastikan ada pelbagai jenis bahan. Bukan satu jenis bahan je. Creative tu bukan satu jenis je nak dibuat. Banyak jenis. Bila banyak jenis, tak kira lah text based ke... imej ke.. video ke... Senang orang terasa nak membeli. Jangan tunjuk testimo

18 Aug 2026, 02:40 UTC≈1,070 viewsread 1 September 2026

Selalunya orang akan ada 2 mazhab. Mazhab content. Mazhab paid ads. Saya tak nampak dua2 ni dunia berbeza. Dua-dua boleh bantu satu sama lain. Good content memudahkan conversion. Good ad memudahkan orang ingat kita. Good content dan ad? Combo multiplier. - Abdul Rahman Https://tulisads.com

17 Aug 2026, 12:41 UTC≈1,410 views0 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Kalau tanya 2 orang pasal beli something. Motivasi dia mesti lain-lain. Contoh mudah lah, ada orang pergi restoran R. Ada orang pergi sebab ada influencer tu kata best. Ada orang pergi sebab kata tempat tu menarik. Benda semudah pergi ke restoran pun ada 2 motivasi berbeza. Ad yang kita buat pun macam tu lah. Jangan target 1 motivasi je. Target lah pelbagai. Ada yang ramai motivasi yang sama. Ada yang kurang

29 Jul 2026, 04:39 UTC≈2,830 views9 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Latest experiment: Guna content untuk reach sebanyak2nya. Lepastu paid ads untuk convert. Menjadi jugak. Cuba buat macam tu. Push dua2. Jangan salah satu. Content tak perlu menjual pun. Janji orang aware dengan website / diri kita. Sekarang ni channel saya share2 je lah apa2 yang berkesan. Kot2 ada yang dapat manfaat kan.

👍63

26 Jun 2026, 00:40 UTC≈3,770 views1 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Cuba tengok cost per purchase. Lebih kurang sama. Apa yang bezakan antara dua ni? AOV. Average Order Value. Atas AOV nya rendah. Yang bawah AOV nya tinggi. Unit economics untuk setiap produk tu penting. Lagi tinggi harga, lagi banyak ringgit yang kita boleh spend untuk dapatkan pelanggan. Just food for thought.

👍1

14 Apr 2026, 13:23 UTC≈6,560 views3 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Ada ad dah failed? Cuba buat ni. Letakkan dia dalam 1 kempen / adset asing, dan buat bid serendah-rendah yang anda nak. KADANG-KADANG. Dia jadi elok kejadiannya. Cuba buat jadi tak untuk ad anda.

👍21

9 Apr 2026, 11:20 UTC≈6,130 viewsread 1 September 2026

Lama dah tak update mengenai Tulis Ads. Ini dia: https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1DqqKNcMUK/

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @tulisadscom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 65,297 of 1,629,535 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Nota Parenting Taufiq Razif
@NotaTaufiqRazif · 158,697
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 13 August 2026
Ask Dr Adam Financial Tips
@dradamzubir · 53,409
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 24 August 2026
Tips Kewangan & Hartanah Azizul
@NotaAzizulAzli · 78,293
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TulisAds 🖊” (@tulisadscom), 28,308 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tulisadscom.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.