Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 37 days, net +22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 908–936 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Sept 2026, 20:01
933
+7
5 Sept 2026, 04:39
926
-1
28 Aug 2026, 23:47
927
+3
21 Aug 2026, 04:43
924
+4
14 Aug 2026, 14:55
920
+8
6 Aug 2026, 22:46
912
+1
6 Aug 2026, 14:07
911
no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:04
911
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
454 reactions across 20 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
138
30.4%
🔥
42
9.25%
custom 5404535748613385138
28
6.17%
⚡
24
5.29%
👍
23
5.07%
🦄
23
5.07%
❤🔥
19
4.19%
🐳
16
3.52%
👀
16
3.52%
😁
16
3.52%
🍾
15
3.30%
custom 5467597172872584200
14
3.08%
custom 5362063083311214432
10
2.20%
🤗
8
1.76%
🤣
7
1.54%
💯
6
1.32%
👏
5
1.10%
🤯
5
1.10%
✍
4
0.881%
👌
4
0.881%
13 further kinds
31
6.83%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 454 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
57
across the posts below
Posts paid on
18
of 20 we hold a reading for · 90%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tumor_board. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 June 2026 to 27 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Навіть найцікавіші дискусії іноді мають зробити паузу 😬
Останні місяці були неймовірно насиченими. Разом із вами ми навчалися сперечалися, шукаючи відповіді на складні клінічні питання, готували вебінари та конференції, знайомилися з новими людьми та вкотре переконувалися: найбільша цінність Tumor Board Café - це наша спільнота ❤️
Тепер настав час трохи перепочити 🏖
Ми беремо невелику відпустку, щоб повернутися з н…
😀😀⬆️⬆️⬆️
Правильна відповідь:
✅ Chemotherapy with 3 cycles of BEP – 3 цикли BEP
Обґрунтування:
Ключовий фактор – рецидив семіноми з великим ретроперитонеальним пухлинним конгломератом
🔵 Це вже не початковий процес, а метастатичний рецидив
🔵 Велика ретроперитонеальна маса відповідає щонайменше поширеній стадії II
🔵 При bulky seminoma стандартом є цисплатин-вмісна хіміотерапія
🔵 Для метастатичної семіноми «сприятливо…
Коли «active surveillance» раптом перетворюється на bulky retroperitoneal disease
🇬🇧
A 42-year-old patient with a previous history of stage I seminoma under active surveillance was diagnosed with deep venous thrombosis of the right leg. Staging CT is shown below.
What is the preferred treatment option for this patient?
🇺🇦
У 42-річного пацієнта з семіномою I стадії в анамнезі, який перебував під активним спостереже…
Здавалося б, усе просто: перша схема - перша лінія, наступна - друга. Але в реальній практиці заміна препарату через токсичність, перехід на підтримувальну терапію або додавання нового компонента можуть рахуватися по-різному 🐱
У 2026 році ESMO опублікувала EnLiST — ESMO Adaptation of Lines of Systemic Therapy 📚 - консенсусний підхід для стандартизованого визначення ліній системної протипухлинної терапії при солідни…
🌞- робимо наступного року
🌊- точно робимо
Два науково-дружніх дні в Одесі завершено!
Ми будемо сумувати за нашими продуктивними розмовами і цікавими доповідями! Наша родина поповнилась чудовими людьми завдяки вашій участі!
Любі учасники і спікери, дякуємо за ваш час!
Пані Одесо, дякуємо за твоє сонце!
👉🏻 Посилання на тести для отримання БПР
Tumor Board Café 🎙
Люба спільното, вже незабаром в нас розпочинається дружня вечеря!
Ми хочемо аби повернувшись до роботи ви мали нові контакти людей, з якими вам є про що разом подумати, відрефлексувати і порадитись!
Вже частина із вас має на своїх бейджах штампи з цифрами 1,2,3,4!
О 19:15 просимо підійти до столу, номер якого вказаний у вас на бейджі!
Якщо ви досі не маєте номеру, вам його поставлять представники нашої команди на в…
Іноді одна випадкова розмова змінює більше, ніж десятки прослуханих лекцій 🦄
Тематичні столи, рандомні ротації, безліч нових знайомств, обговорення різних тем, суворе правило поважати думку одне одного і підтримувати, інтерактивні завдання - все це створює особливу атмосферу на нашій дружній вечері вже в цю пʼятницю 17 липня 🥳
Ми хочемо почути ваші думки, нам цікаво знати вашу думку, ми поважаємо рефлексії наших ко…
ctDNA на ESMO Gastrointestinal Cancers Congress 2026
Від біомаркера до інструменту рішень 📈
1⃣ CIRCULATE-Japan GALAXY study - ctDNA після резекції метастазів CRC у печінці визначає, кому потрібна ад'ювантна хімієтерапія
Вхідні дані 🔃
298 пацієнтів із резектабельними mCRC в печінку.
Медіана спостереження - 43.2 місяці
Що по результатам?
😀 Дослідження показало реальний вплив ctDNA на результати лікування у когорті па…
😱 20 онкологів та онкологинь уже зареєструвалися на київський #esmo_exam 2026 ❤️
Ми пишаємося вами і разом будемо складати цей екзамен 🥰
Наш магічний план підготовки такий:
1⃣ Реєструємося на Tumor Board Café | Breast & Gynecology Cancer і приїжджаємо через тиждень 17–18 липня в Одесу, щоб почути Paul Gougis, Chair of the ESMO Exam Committee, про «ESMO Exam: When and Why?» та Rodrigo Sánchez-Bayona, Chair of the ESM…
⬆️⬆️⬆️
Правильна відповідь: Anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy – Хімієтерапія на основі антрациклінів і таксанів ✨
Обґрунтування:
Ключовий фактор – II триместр вагітності (14 тижнів)
🔴 Починаючи з II триместру антрациклін-вмісна хімієтерапія є стандартом лікування та може проводитися без істотного підвищення ризику вроджених вад розвитку плода
🔴 Таксани також можуть застосовуватися під час II–III триместрів…
⚡7🔥5👍4👀3❤1😢1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tumor_board. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy / Хімієтерапія на основі антрациклінів і таксанів28%
Мастектомія, біопсія сторожового лімфатичного вузла та післяопераційна променева терапія30%
Anti-HER2 therapy / Анти-HER2 терапія31%
Endocrine therapy / Ендокринна терапія5%
Anti-PD1 therapy Анти-PD-1 терапія7%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 27 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tumor Board Café” (@tumor_board), 933 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tumor_board.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.