Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for tupizm

Channel

tupizm

@tupizzm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,193subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001451716400
TypeChannel
Username@tupizzm
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tupizzm

Growth

1,1841,2001,1927 August 2026 — 1,197 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,197 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,196 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,197 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,200 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,199 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,196 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,198 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,194 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,190 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,185 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,184 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,193 subscribers1,1937 August 202611 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 35 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,182–1,202 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 17:001,193+9
6 Sept 2026, 17:221,184-1
1 Sept 2026, 19:251,185-5
29 Aug 2026, 23:541,190-4
27 Aug 2026, 03:531,194-4
24 Aug 2026, 03:281,198+2
20 Aug 2026, 19:331,196-3
17 Aug 2026, 19:591,199-1
14 Aug 2026, 11:381,200+3
11 Aug 2026, 04:211,197+1
7 Aug 2026, 23:121,196-1
7 Aug 2026, 05:311,197no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:241,197first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

133 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😡6045.1%
🤣2619.5%
139.77%
❤‍🔥139.77%
🍌75.26%
🐳64.51%
🤗32.26%
😐21.50%
🤩21.50%
💯10.752%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 133 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC124 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Израиль выпустил, вот такой пост в X — и получил 9000 шуток про Гитлера

❤‍🔥5

31 Jul 2026, 16:36 UTC181 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Новый «Человек-паук» от Marvel установил рекорд по сборам в первый день проката в США, заработав 72 млн долларов. По итогам дебютного уикенда фильму прогнозируют около 800 млн долларов мировых сборов — это второй результат в истории после «Мстителей: Финал». В России премьеру картины отложили из-за выхода фильма «Последний богатырь. Колобок».

😡8😐2

31 Jul 2026, 15:36 UTC189 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Маск разбил сердце Зеленскому 💔

🐳6🤗1😡1

31 Jul 2026, 13:04 UTC189 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

мафаня выдал базу ☝️💪💪

😡3💯1

29 Jul 2026, 20:29 UTC224 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Как-то я говорил о преимуществах ВК над Телеграмом. Щас вспомнил ещё одно и напомню предыдущие: 1. Раздел музыки. Нормально оформлен, можно зайти в карточку музыканта и там почекать новые релизы, послушать альбомы. В телеграме до сих пор надо кучу ботов юзать для музыки ещё и с тупой рекламой а-ля "подпишись на тгк чтобы скачать трек". Хотя в ВК тоже бесит реклама в музыке "ты слушаешь рекламу, как не слушать эту рек

🤣6😡31

29 Jul 2026, 18:51 UTC183 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Насчет облысения Братишкина. Я ху знает поч чел сразу как первые по шкалу норвуда признаки заметил, почему он не схватился за миноксидил. Пока проблему можно было скрывать длинной шевелюрой, а параллельно фиксить миноксидилом и усё. Или чел буквально спохватился за волосы когда ему тупо начали подъёбки в чатике писать насчет лысины )) Да и с его баблом можно было на париках сидеть как у Павла Дурова опять же параллел

😡5

29 Jul 2026, 18:46 UTC177 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @maddysontgPhoto

Поржал сегодня с того, как один из симпов фасольки агрессировал на паблик ботоводикс. Предъявлял за то, что там засирают братишкина за тупость и лысость, тоху 200х200 за жир и рабство под Дианой, оляшу за то, что она старая пизда, а фасольку за то, что она шлюха-детоуйбица. Ну вы меня извините, молодой человек, а не кажется ли вам, что никто никого не засирает. Разве Братишкин волосатый и умный? Нет. Он лысый и ту

😡5

29 Jul 2026, 18:15 UTC175 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @apwagnerPhoto

Хорошая бабушка. Быть добру!

4😡1

27 Jul 2026, 13:02 UTC161 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @tuupizmVideo

❗️Бэдкамедиану грозит уголовное дело Cтас Ай Как просто слил своего бывшего друга BadComedian поведав о том, как его общим знакомым слили инфу, что тот донатил Борису Кагарлицкому* уже после того, как последнего признали "террористом" и "иностранным агентом".

🍌7🤣1😡1

24 Jul 2026, 09:10 UTC265 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

6🤣2😡1

22 Jul 2026, 09:41 UTC296 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Cola Zero ускоряет старение мозга, показало новое исследование Ученые проанализировали данные за 8 лет, результат убил: подопытные, которые пили больше напитков с искусственными сахарозаменителями, теряли память и умственные способности на 62% быстрее других Самыми опасными веществами для мозга стали ацесульфам-К, аспартам и похожие сахарозаменители, которых очень много в газировках и энергетиках без сахара Помяне

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @tupizzm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“tupizm” (@tupizzm), 1,193 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tupizzm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.