Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for turbabaza

Channel

turbabaza

@turbabaza

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

681subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001135418636
TypeChannel
Username@turbabaza
Created19 June 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/turbabaza

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

681686683.56 August 2026 — 686 subscribers6 August 2026 — 686 subscribers5 September 2026 — 683 subscribers12 September 2026 — 681 subscribers6 August 202612 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 38 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 680–687 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 22:40681-2
5 Sept 2026, 02:39683-3
6 Aug 2026, 16:38686no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:24686first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 13 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

102 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤7270.6%
🔥2221.6%
👏65.88%
👍21.96%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 102 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 13 February 2026 to 1 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Jul 2026, 13:21 UTC218 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Увлекательнейшая оказалась история взлета и падения трёхногой “т”. Впервые я увидел её современную какраз у журнала, сегодня узнал её историю. Рекомендую к прочтению.

🔥2👍1

1 Jul 2026, 13:21 UTC208 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @typejournalruPhoto

Трёхногая т — тот случай, когда, казалось бы, отжившая форма смогла проложить себе дорогу в настоящее. В своей колонке типограф Максим Жуков описал происхождение и причины распространения такого варианта буквы. Путь, пройденный трёхногой т от петровских книг до конструктивистских плакатов, показывает, как одна и та же форма обретает различные значения в зависимости от времени и контекста. Колонка опубликована на рус…

🔥6❤3

3 Jun 2026, 08:02 UTC384 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Лекция “Королевы Книг” Ирмы Бом: youtube.com/watch?v=9yqpiVA3AXI&t=2746s&pp=0gcJCSALAYcqIYzv Некоторые её работы прикладываю, горячо рекомендую детально отсмотреть как можно больше её работ.

❤4🔥4

28 Apr 2026, 11:00 UTC499 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Вышло промо-кейс-интервью на The Brand Identity по проекту Eden, интересно, что проект был сделан уже какое-то время назад, но позиционирование продуктов, строящихся полностью или частично на Ai фичах кажется не сильно поменялось, кто-то описывает просто как фичу, кто-то кричит во весь голос, кто-то пытается выглядеть “крафтово”, а кто-то говорит про пользу для людей. Также не менее интересно, как поменялся продакшн…

👏6🔥4❤1

17 Apr 2026, 16:36 UTC553 viewsread 6 August 2026

Вышел Claude Design! Видео: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_LBECIQQqs Статья: https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-design-anthropic-labs Возможно это тот самый переходный момент, когда парадигма взаимодействия с интерфейсом меняется, а возможно и пустышка. Что думаете? UPD по первым впечатлениям: — имея опыт работы с Claude видно, что это UI апдейт скорее, чем что-то совершенно новое — собственно ui апдейт хорош,…

17 Apr 2026, 09:00 UTC390 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @stulchiki_shtuchkiPhoto

Шагающий стол от студии предметного дизайна KILZI из Барселоны. Сильно очаровал меня 🥰 Этот предмет из коллекции «Barefoot». 🔘 #предметный_дизайн #стол #барселона #kilzi

❤17

25 Feb 2026, 17:18 UTC514 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Сделали в Clay кейс проекта Eden: https://clay.global/work/eden Лично мне очень нравится как сам проект, так и идея, которая стоит за этим продуктом. Нравится название и, как я считаю, очень удачная графика для логомарка. Визуальная коммуникация впитала в себя как “книжные” каноничные приемы, так и диджитал эстетику, из всего получился неплохой такой суп. Команде респект! PS. Передаю привет себе первокурснику, котор…

❤20🔥2👍1

17 Feb 2026, 08:56 UTC526 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Ну что там? А там у нас рубрика на канале Дорогие дизайнеры, где Антон Прокопьев и Иван Васин разбирают новые кейсы из индустрии. Горячо рекомендую во-первых, послушать анализ от умных ребят с опытом, а во-вторых, рекомендую заводить такой же формат самим и делать разборы. Ну и зовите на эфиры конечно же! Последний ролик из рубрики, как всегда много продуктов и способов обернуть технологии в визуал: https://www.yout…

❤8🔥1

13 Feb 2026, 08:40 UTC543 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Сделали рекламу на Times Square! Не так давно мы в Clay закончили помогать нашему постоянному клиенту с рекламной кампанией, которая включала разные носители, от сетевых билбордов до анимированных дисплеев в разных локациях и размерах. Особенно весёлыми были дисплеи с загнутыми экранами. Работали оперативно и чётко, командой бесконечно горжусь. Пара тезисов по такой работе: — Как дизайн-директору и организатору проц…

❤19🔥3

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @turbabaza. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Kostya Gorsky’s Channel
@desprod · 25,894
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“turbabaza” (@turbabaza), 681 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/turbabaza.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.