Как и обещала, два конспекта по митозу и мейозу, отправляю вам авансом, 15 реакций не набрали, но давайте поставим ❤️ за старания)) Если хотите викторинку по митозу и мейозу, ставим 🔥
👍4

Channel
@turbobio
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,428subscribers
-287 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001511523114 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @turbobio |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/turbobio |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 06:00 | 6,428 | -44 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 23:17 | 6,472 | -35 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:15 | 6,507 | -43 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:32 | 6,550 | -18 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:38 | 6,568 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:58 | 6,571 | -34 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:38 | 6,605 | -32 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:06 | 6,637 | -23 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 6,660 | -26 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:08 | 6,686 | -29 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:00 | 6,715 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 6,715 | first reading |
45 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 20 of 22 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 45 (24 July 2026 – 20 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,633 |
| Reactions total | 83 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Aug 2026, 12:43 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
137 reactions across 35 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 59 | 43.1% | |
| 🔥 | 50 | 36.5% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 10.9% | |
| 🥰 | 10 | 7.30% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.73% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.73% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.73% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 137 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как и обещала, два конспекта по митозу и мейозу, отправляю вам авансом, 15 реакций не набрали, но давайте поставим ❤️ за старания)) Если хотите викторинку по митозу и мейозу, ставим 🔥
👍4
File, posted without a caption
🔔 Будущие 11-классники, эта информация для вас! До 1 сентября можно зафиксировать лучшую цену на весь учебный год 26/27! Потом стоимость будет постоянно повышаться. 🎁 А еще если ты берешь 2 предмета, то 3-й и 4-й ты получаешь в подарок абсолютно бесплатно! 💰 Стоимость подписки на 4 предмета: 🟢 Стандарт — 73 000 ₽ за весь курс или примерно 8 111 ₽/мес 🟠 Про — 98 000 ₽ за весь курс или примерно 10 889 ₽/мес 🟣 Премиум …
🔥5
Собираем на этом посте 15 реакций ❤️ и я выкладываю 2 конспекта по митозу и мейозу, с нарисованными мной иллюстрациями каждой фазы, описанием и так же отдельным листом для самостоятельного заполнения, который можно повесить на стену 😍
❤11👍1🔥1
Мейоз II (Эквационное деление) · Между делениями нет репликации ДНК. 1️⃣Профаза II · Формируется веретено деления, исчезает ядерная оболочка (если она успела образоваться). 2️⃣Метафаза II · Хромосомы (из двух хроматид) выстраиваются по экватору. 3️⃣Анафаза II · Центромеры делятся, и сестринские хроматиды расходятся к разным полюсам. 4️⃣Телофаза II · Хромосомы деспирализуются, формируются ядерные оболочк…
❤3
Сегодня на связи мейоз 📞 Мейоз I (Редукционное деление) 1️⃣Профаза I · Самая сложная и длительная стадия. · Хромосомы спирализуются, гомологичные хромосомы сближаются и конъюгируют (образуют биваленты). · Происходит кроссинговер — обмен участками между гомологичными хромосомами, что обеспечивает генетическое разнообразие. · Распадается ядерная оболочка. 2️⃣Метафаза I · Биваленты (пары гомологичных хр…
❤3
📞 Але, это митоз? Что это и зачем оно нам надо? 👉🏻 Создание двух одинаковых клеток с тем же набором хромосом, что и у мамочкиной клеточки (2n → 2n / n → n). Результат: 2 новые АБСОЛЮТНО ИДЕНТИЧНЫЕ клетки йоу. Погнали по фазам прогоним 🤘🏽😝 1️⃣ Профаза · Хромосомы спирализуются, становятся видимыми. · Исчезает ядрышко, распадается ядерная оболочка. · Центриоли расходятся к полюсам клетки и формируют верете…
❤5
Давайте будем честны, мы проходим биологию для того, чтобы понимать биологические мемы, но для тех, кто в танке, ловите разбор 👇🏻
🔥6
Posted without readable text
И при чём здесь сон? А теперь самое интересное: даже после того, как мы закончили учить материал, работа с ним ещё не заканчивается. Во время сна мозг продолжает обрабатывать полученную за день информацию. В частности, сон связан с закреплением воспоминаний — процессом, который называют консолидацией памяти 🧠💤 Поэтому схема: выучить → повторить → поспать намного полезнее, чем: выучить → всю ночь не спать → прийти …
🔥3
А что, если повторять не сразу? Представьте: вы выучили тему сегодня, а завтра полностью её забыли. Знакомо? 😅 На самом деле это нормально. Мозг постоянно отбирает, какую информацию стоит сохранить, а какую можно постепенно забыть. Поэтому очень помогает интервальное повторение — возвращение к материалу через определённые промежутки времени. Например: 📚 выучили тему → повторили вечером → ещё раз через несколько дн…
🔥2
Котятки, доброе утро, сегодня продолжаем нашу импровизированную серию постов про память, и сегодня мы немного поговорим о том, как информация «оседает» у нас в голове🤓🙌 Кажется, что для хорошей памяти нужно просто много раз перечитать материал. Но есть способы помочь мозгу запомнить информацию гораздо эффективнее 👀 Один из самых простых — связывать новую информацию с уже знакомой. Например, если нужно запомнить, чт…
🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @turbobio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
😴 Вопрос 3. Что происходит во время сна?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🧠 Вопрос 2. Почему мы можем научиться чему-то новому?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🧠 Вопрос 1. Что происходит с информацией во время сна?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какого контента вам не хватает в канале? 🥲
The shares total 143%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 20 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Биология ЕГЭ Турбо” (@turbobio), 6,428 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/turbobio.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.