Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Turtweet

Channel

Turtweet

@turtweet

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,750subscribers

-33 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001884255476
TypeChannel
Username@turtweet
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/turtweet

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,7504,7834,766.57 August 2026 — 4,783 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,783 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,774 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,771 subscribers20 August 2026 — 4,769 subscribers23 August 2026 — 4,762 subscribers27 August 2026 — 4,766 subscribers29 August 2026 — 4,759 subscribers10 September 2026 — 4,758 subscribers14 September 2026 — 4,752 subscribers19 September 2026 — 4,750 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 42 days, net -33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,745–4,788 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 00:184,750-2
14 Sept 2026, 07:174,752-6
10 Sept 2026, 22:394,758-1
29 Aug 2026, 20:554,759-7
27 Aug 2026, 03:064,766+4
23 Aug 2026, 21:374,762-7
20 Aug 2026, 14:344,769-2
14 Aug 2026, 14:284,771-3
11 Aug 2026, 14:214,774-9
8 Aug 2026, 04:144,783no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:484,783first reading

Engagement

48 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 48 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

4,331 reactions across 48 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣1,26029.1%
👍1,15526.7%
👏3367.76%
2044.71%
🍌1984.57%
🫡1934.46%
🤔1693.90%
❤‍🔥1683.88%
🤮1463.37%
🍾1102.54%
🔥972.24%
👎942.17%
🤬892.05%
🌚400.924%
🗿250.577%
🤡200.462%
💋110.254%
🤯110.254%
🕊40.092%
👌10.023%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,331 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 20:14 UTC675 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026

مخالف اولان دوستلاریمیزین نظرلرین ائشیتماخ بیزی سئویندیرر

🔥18🍌1👏1🤣1

11 Aug 2026, 20:02 UTC901 views76 reactionsread 12 August 2026

نیه آذربایجان دا تحصیلی مهاجرت آزدی! اقتصاد ایرانین هر یئرین ده تقریباً عینی دورومدا و اگر تهران دا تحصیلی مهاجرت اوچون مانع ساییلسا، تبریز اردبیل و اورمیه ده ده ساییلا بیلر. خانواده لرین آذربایجان بولگه‌سین ده داها اونملی اولماسی و هرکسین خانواده‌یه باغلیلیغی تحصیلی مهاجرت لرین قاباغین آلان اصلی عامل لردن بیری دی. آما دانیشماخ ایسته‌دییمیز قونو بونلار دئیل، بلکه دیل حاقین‌دا دانیشماخ ایستیریخ. اروپا آمریکا و کانا

👏55👎8👍64🍌1💋1🗿1

11 Aug 2026, 19:29 UTC785 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026

اقتصاد، خانواده‌نین اهمیتی و اونا باغلی‌لیخ بونلاردان سورا باشقا دلیل لری نمنه اولا بیلر؟

29🍌1

11 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC≈1,020 views54 reactionsread 12 August 2026

آذربایجان دا نیه تحصیلی مهاجرت آزدی؟ نیه دانشجولار درس اوخوماخ اوچون باشقا اولکه‌لره گئتمیرلر؟ آذربایجان دا اولان تحصیلی مهاجرتلرین نیه چوخو تورکیه دی؟ سیزجه بونون علت لری نمنه اولا بیلر؟ @turtweet

👏42🤔5🌚42🍌1

11 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTC≈1,110 views98 reactionsread 12 August 2026

سیزجه اعدام حکمو نجور دی؟ اولمالی دی یوخسا اولماسا یاخجی‌ دی؟ مثلا بیر نفر نئچه قتل ائلییب، یا نئچه نفره و یا اوشاخلارا تجاوز ائلییب یا اویوشدوروجو قوشوب و ساتیب اولارین حکمو نمنه اولا بیلر؟

👍56🤔28👎11🍌21

11 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC≈1,100 views71 reactionsread 12 August 2026

لوبنان دا اعدام حکمو ییغیشدیریلدی. بونان سورا هئچکسی اعدام ائله‌میه‌جک‌لر @turtweet

49👎10👍6🍌2🕊2🤔1🤬1

11 Aug 2026, 14:14 UTC≈1,080 views55 reactionsread 12 August 2026

میلل سازمانی فقط اظهار نگرانی ائلییر پاکیستان فقط توافقون اولماغیندان دئیر @turtweet ایکیسی ده یالان دییر

🤣54🍌1

11 Aug 2026, 14:13 UTC≈1,060 views51 reactionsread 12 August 2026

پاکیستان: ایران و آمریکا بیر سیرا آنلاشمالارا چاتیب‌لار @turtweet پاکیستان دا همیشه خوش خبر وئریر آما سونو خوش اولمور

🤣481🍌1👍1

11 Aug 2026, 14:12 UTC≈1,050 views63 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ترامپ: ایران‌لا دانیشماق‌دان بئزمیشم @turtweet

🤣61🍌1🤡1

11 Aug 2026, 14:09 UTC≈1,040 views42 reactionsread 12 August 2026

عاریف: ایچری ده ساواشماغا وختیمیز یوخدی و باهالیخ بیر واقعیت دی @turtweet

🌚365🍌1

11 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC≈1,060 views58 reactionsread 12 August 2026

حوثی‌لر سعودی عربستانین بیر گمی‌سین ووروب نئچه نفر پاکیستان‌لی اولوب @turtweet

🤣46🤔9🤡2🍌1

11 Aug 2026, 08:25 UTC≈1,160 views77 reactionsread 12 August 2026

بو بیر ساواش دئدیم و چکدیم قیلیچ لاری قیلیچ لاریم دان داها کسکین میش باخیش لارین #paşa @turtweet

🫡66❤‍🔥6🍌2🕊2🤡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @turtweet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 19:21 UTCAnonymous Poll450 voters

سیزین نظریزه نجور خبر دی؟

  1. قشح خبر27%
  2. پیس خبر77%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Khorshid | خورشید
@itsabout_khorshid · 60,963
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Turtweet” (@turtweet), 4,750 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/turtweet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.