National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far below this size band
382 average views per post against 43,024 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.889%. Across the 601 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,664–99,866 subscribers, posting mainly in Ukrainian — the middle half sit between 10.2% and 25.7%, with a median of 16.4%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (27 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Posts measured
489 of 490 published in the window (489 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
187,006
Mature posts only
1.43% over 21 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 26 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net +16,117. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,372–46,342 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 22:02
43,024
-170
15 Sept 2026, 15:41
43,194
-140
13 Sept 2026, 23:59
43,334
-166
12 Sept 2026, 03:58
43,500
-307
9 Sept 2026, 21:17
43,807
+16,552
6 Sept 2026, 10:59
27,255
-122
4 Sept 2026, 02:58
27,377
-98
2 Sept 2026, 17:48
27,475
-40
1 Sept 2026, 15:03
27,515
-52
31 Aug 2026, 16:25
27,567
-37
30 Aug 2026, 14:53
27,604
-38
29 Aug 2026, 18:06
27,642
-20
28 Aug 2026, 15:28
27,662
-21
27 Aug 2026, 17:04
27,683
-30
26 Aug 2026, 19:03
27,713
-63
25 Aug 2026, 17:01
27,776
-54
24 Aug 2026, 15:55
27,830
-162
22 Aug 2026, 23:52
27,992
-37
21 Aug 2026, 14:37
28,029
-75
20 Aug 2026, 14:08
28,104
first reading
Engagement
864 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 84 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.88%
avg views ÷ 43,024 subscribers
Avg views / post
378
480 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.60%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
481
of 864 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 445 of 480 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held
864 (5 August 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total
181,647
Reactions total
2,704
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Sept 2026, 23:33 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈23,900
Videos
≈19,100
Links
≈11,300
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
6h 53m
Average length
1m 14s
Measured directly from 336 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,167 reactions across 812 posts, in 50 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,786
29.0%
❤
1,525
24.7%
🔥
672
10.9%
👏
596
9.66%
😱
261
4.23%
😢
172
2.79%
👌
156
2.53%
🙏
85
1.38%
🤝
84
1.36%
👎
79
1.28%
🤔
79
1.28%
😨
55
0.892%
🏆
54
0.876%
😍
43
0.697%
🤡
43
0.697%
🤩
43
0.697%
🤮
42
0.681%
👀
38
0.616%
✍
35
0.568%
💔
29
0.47%
30 further kinds
290
4.70%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 815 of the 864 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,167 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 864 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 858 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tv24kz_kaz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 864 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 25 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Маңғыстауда қаза тапқан әскери қызметшілер мемлекеттік марапатқа ұсынылады
Мемлекет басшысы Қасым-Жомарт Тоқаев Маңғыстау облысында әскери оқу-жаттығу кезінде қаза тапқан әскери қызметшілердің отбасыларына көңіл айтып, жеделхат жолдады.
Президенттің көңіл айту жеделхаттарын Маңғыстау және Түркістан облыстарының басшылары, Бас мүфти Наурызбай Тағанұлы және қоғам белсенділері қаза тапқан әскери қызметшілердің жақында…
Каспий теңізінде болған қайғылы оқиғаға қатысты тергеу жүріп жатыр. Үкіметтік комиссия мүшелері себеп-салдарын анықтап, бүге-шігесіне дейін тексереді.
Айта кетсек, бүгін Орал әуежайына Каспий теңізіндегі қайғылы оқиға салдарынан қаза тапқан 3 әскери қызметшінің сүйегі арнайы ұшақпен жеткізілді. Қаза тапқан сарбаздармен қоштасу және оларды жерлеу рәсімі ертең өтеді.
Қасым-Жомарт Тоқаевтың атына Каспий теңізіндегі оқу-жаттығу жиыны барысында әскери қызметшілердің қаза табуына байланысты шет мемлекеттердің басшылары мен халықаралық ұйымдардың жетекшілерінен көңіл айту жеделхаттары келіп түсіп жатыр
Жеделхаттарда шетел көшбасшылары осынау қиын сәтте Қазақстан халқымен бірге екенін жеткізген.
Сонымен қатар қазақстандықтардың ауыр қайғысына ортақтасып, қаза тапқан азаматтардың туға…
Жалпыұлттық аза тұту күні елмен бірге шетелдегі отандастар да қайғырып жатыр.
Франциядағы Қазақстан Елшілігіне жұрт гүл шоқтарын әкеліп, көңіл айту кітабына жазба қалдырды. Елшілік ғимаратының алдындағы тулар төмен түсірілді.
Анкарада ТҮРКСОЙ ұжымы қаралы оқиғада қаза болғандарды бір минут үнсіздікпен еске алды. Түркі мемлекеттерінің тулары төмен түсірілді.
Ал Қазақстанның Түркиядағы Елшілігінде Түркияның жоғары лауазым иелері мен дипмиссия өкілдері көңіл айтып, қолдау білдірді.
Қаражат атаулы әрі ашық түрде бөлінеді: Маңғыстауда қаза болған және зардап шеккен әскери қызметшілердің отбасыларына қалай көмек көрсетіледі?
📌 Ақтау қаласында Маңғыстау облысында әскери қызметшілердің қаза болуына әкеп соққан төтенше жағдайдың себептерін тергеу және салдарын жою жөніндегі Үкіметтік комиссияның отырысы өтті.
Отырысты қорытындылай келе, Үкіметтік комиссияның төрағасы Қанат Бозымбаев мемлекет қаза б…
🌦️ Қазгидрометтің дерегі бойынша, 26, 27 және 28 қыркүйек күндері Қазақстанда ауа райы күрт өзгереді. Республика аумағында айтарлықтай суық түсіп, кейбір өңірлерде термометр бағаны нөлден төмен түседі.
🌧️ Елдің басым бөлігінде жауын-шашынсыз ауа райы орнағанымен, жекелеген аймақтарда найзағай ойнап, жаңбыр жауады, ал таулы өңірлерде қар жаууы ықтимал.
🌬️ Қазақстанның көп бөлігінде ауа райын солтүстік-батыс антицикл…
ҚР Ішкі істер министрінің орынбасары Санжар Әділовтың айтуынша, сарбаздардың қазасына қатысы бар әскери қызметкерлер Қылмыстық кодекстің екі бабы бойынша жауапқа тартылады.
⚡️ Маңғыстаудағы қайғылы жағдай: әкімдік қаражат аударуды міндеттеген жоқ
Қаза тапқан әскери қызметшілердің отбасыларына материалдық қолдау көрсеткісі келетін азаматтар, бизнес өкілдері мен ұйымдар үшін бірыңғай қор жұмыс істеуде.
Бұл ретте қаражат аудару тек ерікті түрде жүзеге асырылады.
❗️Облыс әкімдігі тарапынан азаматтарға, кәсіпкерлерге, ұйымдарға немесе олардың қызметкерлеріне қаражат аудару туралы ешқандай …
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 864 posts we hold for @tv24kz_kaz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@tv24kz_kaz edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
16 August 2026
Most recent edit
25 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@tv24kz_kaz named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@tuyin24kz named in 2 posts, 14 September 2026 – 14 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
112 KZ @qr_tjm · 33,460 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 4 September 2026
Qazaqstan.tv @qazaqstantv · 42,370 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 29 August 2026
EL.INFO @elinfo_kz · 32,402 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 5 September 2026
KeyNews @allkeynews · 20,785 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 26 September 2026
NUR.KZ - Новости Казахстана @newsnurkz · 75,269 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
Казинформ @kazinform_news · 31,016 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 6 September 2026
Zakon.kz - Новости Казахстана и мира @zakonkz · 202,651 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 August 2026
HALYQSTAN 🇰🇿 @halyqstan · 30,662 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 6 September 2026
QOGAM by SATZHANGRAM @qogamnews · 22,747 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 September 2026
UKIMET @KZgovernment · 21,217 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 24 September 2026
KAZAKH_INFORM @kazakh_inform · 43,533 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“24KZ - ЖАҢАЛЫҚТАР” (@tv24kz_kaz), 43,024 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tv24kz_kaz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.