Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for twitch.tv/skip_sg

Channel

twitch.tv/skip_sg

@twitch_skip_sg

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,921subscribers

+146 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002072575008
TypeChannel
Username@twitch_skip_sg
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/twitch_skip_sg

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

7,590 average views per post against 7,921 subscribers — an engagement rate of 95.9%. Across the 6,886 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,167–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.88% and 18.1%, with a median of 9.64%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (19 August 2026 18 September 2026)
Posts measured14 of 14 published in the window (0 exact, 14 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled106,320
Mature posts only101.5% over 12 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers7,921 measured 15 September 2026
Cohortb3162:rus · 6,886 channels · p10 2.59% · p25 4.88% · p50 9.64% · p75 18.1% · p90 29.6%
Position in cohort99.680th percentile · 9.9× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.046% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 18 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

7,7757,9217,8487 August 2026 — 7,775 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,775 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,777 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,786 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,788 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,801 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,803 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,813 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,823 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,845 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,853 subscribers7 September 2026 — 7,878 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7,915 subscribers15 September 2026 — 7,921 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 39 days, net +146. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,753–7,943 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 20:567,921+6
11 Sept 2026, 22:417,915+37
7 Sept 2026, 19:597,878+25
2 Sept 2026, 21:487,853+8
30 Aug 2026, 17:567,845+22
27 Aug 2026, 09:287,823+10
24 Aug 2026, 06:567,813+10
20 Aug 2026, 14:157,803+2
17 Aug 2026, 14:597,801+13
14 Aug 2026, 16:287,788+2
11 Aug 2026, 09:057,786+9
8 Aug 2026, 11:517,777+2
7 Aug 2026, 15:007,775no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:577,775first reading

Engagement

36 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
95.9%
avg views ÷ 7,921 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,590
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 36 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held36 (22 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total106,320
Reactions total3,595
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 20:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
44s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

10,194 reactions across 36 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁3,71736.5%
🤣1,54915.2%
1,49914.7%
❤‍🔥7277.13%
🫡5515.41%
👍5014.91%
💯3283.22%
🔥3113.05%
🤔2252.21%
🥱1000.981%
🤯810.795%
👏770.755%
🤷‍♂550.54%
🎉540.53%
🤗480.471%
🤨440.432%
🤝410.402%
😭400.392%
🕊300.294%
🤮280.275%
19 further kinds1881.84%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,194 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC≈4,320 views187 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Чисто я во время после тяжёлого трудового дня.

😁15718💯7❤‍🔥3👍2

27 Aug 2026, 22:48 UTC≈5,530 views229 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Если Бог существует, я больше никогда не увижу её ни в одном фильме.

😁152🤣53👍21❤‍🔥2🤔1

27 Aug 2026, 19:37 UTC≈5,720 views139 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Пока все Нетфликс'н'чиллят под трансляцию GTA 6, скажу, что Evil Dead Burn - самый красивый хоррор/слэшер, который я видел. (Я их, если что, видел мало) Но это прям эстетический оргазм. Очень понравилось.

👍10719🤔10❤‍🔥2😁1

27 Aug 2026, 18:19 UTC≈20,700 views320 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Угадайте, кто снова забил на оптимизацию? (Чуть ли не 100% негативных отзывов как раз из-за неё) Только рожая, женщина способна испытать ту же боль, как когда мне приходится включать DLSS... В ПОШАГОВОЙ ИГРЕ!

🫡233😁48🤣2510❤‍🔥4

27 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC≈5,950 views370 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Всё, я пропал. УВИДИМСЯ ЧЕРЕЗ МЕСЯЦ.

😁270🤗4531🤝17❤‍🔥7

27 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC≈5,840 views166 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁13516🤝12🌚2❤‍🔥1

27 Aug 2026, 01:40 UTC≈6,090 views197 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Окей, это было ошибкой. Лучше бы игра осталась хорошей в моих смутных воспоминаниях, чем сейчас я пробегал мимо всех энкаунтеров, потому что в 2026-м геймплей исчерпывает себя за шестьдесят минут. А длится прохождение восемь часов. Но постановка экшена все ещё бодрая!

🤔12140😁29🐳5🖕2

26 Aug 2026, 21:32 UTC≈6,190 views279 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Заходит чувак в офис Голливуда (там главы всех студий сидят, инфа 100%) и говорит: «Чуваки, хочу снять фильм». Они ему: - Сценарий, сюжет, раскадровки, что-нибудь есть? - Нет. Есть идея! - Заебись! Вот тебе бесконечное количество денег и никаких сроков. Ебош! Он с 2012 года пишет, снимает, переписывает заново, добавляет сцены, рисует под них CGI, переделывает его раз за разом. Актёры ходят к нему каждые полгода, чт

😁193🤣64😢106💯6

26 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC≈6,280 views344 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

ДОСТИЖЕНИЕ!

❤‍🔥181😁106🤣4011🔥6

26 Aug 2026, 00:53 UTC≈6,330 views250 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Отанокак

😁204🤨2712🎉4❤‍🔥3

25 Aug 2026, 22:11 UTC≈6,330 views132 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Норм клон Resident Evil. По скидке на распродаже так вообще хорошо. Концовка шизой своей правда не шибко порадовала

94😁24❤‍🔥11💩2🤨1

24 Aug 2026, 00:32 UTC≈8,970 views318 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Час бегал по лесам в Wardogs с базукой в руках в попытках выцепить точку высадки вражеских подкреплений. СТОИЛО ТОГО!

😁226👏5323🔥10👾6

Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @twitch_skip_sg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“twitch.tv/skip_sg” (@twitch_skip_sg), 7,921 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/twitch_skip_sg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.