Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Типичный Поттероман — Typical Potterhead

Channel

Типичный Поттероман — Typical Potterhead

@typicalpotterhead

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

437subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001815894081
TypeChannel
Username@typicalpotterhead
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/typicalpotterhead

Growth

43743943810 August 2026 — 437 subscribers11 August 2026 — 437 subscribers25 August 2026 — 439 subscribers31 August 2026 — 437 subscribers10 August 202631 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 21 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 437–439 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 19:45437-2
25 Aug 2026, 03:18439+2
11 Aug 2026, 15:03437no change
10 Aug 2026, 15:15437first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

227 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9843.2%
😁4821.1%
🤣3214.1%
🌚198.37%
👍125.29%
❤‍🔥93.96%
🔥83.52%
🤝10.441%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 227 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC136 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @potter7booksPhoto

Американское издательство Scholastic готовит необычный релиз — 3 ноября выйдет иллюстрированное издание Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone с рисунками Джима Кея в мягком переплёте. Главная особенность — это название книги. На американском рынке первая часть серии всегда выходила как Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone («Волшебный» камень — вместо «Философского»). Теперь же впервые за почти 30-летнюю историю

9🔥2

8 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC188 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Почему Рон так бесит фанатов поттерианы? Да, он вспыльчивый. Завистливый. Эгоистичный. Но почему мы прощаем эти недостатки другим героям — и так суровы к Рону? Вчера в нашем Клубе Слизней вышел первый пост с шикарным разбором Рона Уизли. А сегодня выйдет первый пост с не менее классным разбором Нимфадоры Тонкс, который члены Клуба в ТГ выбирали аж две недели подряд. Если вам хочется не просто читать книги о Гарри

2

8 Aug 2026, 07:42 UTC182 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🎁В эти выходные Кэти Льюнг празднует день рождения. Сегодня актрисе, воплотившей в жизнь образ Чоу Чанг, исполнилось 39 лет. 🎂 Желаем ей гармонии во всех начинаниях и новых прекрасных ролей. А чего бы пожелали вы? Пишите в комментариях 👇 #hp #hp_birthdays

14

7 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC187 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Есть хоть одна культовая франшиза, в которой не засветился этот парень? #JamieCampbellBower #Жизнь_вне_Хогвартса

12

6 Aug 2026, 16:53 UTC207 views30 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

То есть, я правильно понимаю — взрослый мужик пришел в книжный магазин, чтобы... потроллить двенадцатилетних детей? Зачем ему это вообще было нужно? Он дурак? #hp

😁30

5 Aug 2026, 19:29 UTC240 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Какая сюжетная дыра в «Гарри Поттере» удивляет вас больше всего? Роулинг скрупулёзно работала над тем, чтобы все книги были связаны одним сюжетом. Почти каждый элемент истории был тщательно спланирован, чтобы все детали соотносились друг с другом. Это позволило написать как весёлые и очень многозначительные шутки (прим.пер. — вроде той, где Фред и Джордж били снежками по тюрбану Квиррелла, не догадываясь, что кидают

16❤‍🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 18:35 UTC270 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Почему именно Драмиона остается самым популярным пэйрингом в фандоме «Гарри Поттера»? Какие литературные тропы сделали его практически идеальной основой для любовных романов? Почему издательства так охотно покупают истории, построенные на похожих конфликтах? И как фанфик по «Гарри Поттеру» превратился в мировой бестселлер? Мы решили посмотреть на феномен Драмионы не глазами шипперов, а глазами литературоведов и люде

5

3 Aug 2026, 14:53 UTC207 views26 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Фраза Рона про клыки василиска была гениальной — почему до этого больше никто не додумался? В «Дарах Смерти» мы читали о сложном плане Дамблдора по передаче меча Гарри. Чтобы дать ему оружие, способное уничтожить хоркруксы, он даже привлёк Министерство, включив меч в своё завещание. Но если меч уничтожает хоркруксы лишь потому, что напитан ядом василиска, то решение Рона вернуться в Тайную Комнату было гениальным —

👍128🔥6

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @typicalpotterhead. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Типичный Поттероман — Typical Potterhead” (@typicalpotterhead), 437 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/typicalpotterhead.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.