Channel
@typicalreputation
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
193subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001232183634 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @typicalreputation |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/typicalreputation |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 20:17 | 193 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 192 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:45 | 193 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:47 | 192 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 192 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
65 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 18 | 27.7% | |
| 😁 | 12 | 18.5% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 15.4% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 12.3% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 4.62% | |
| 😐 | 3 | 4.62% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 4.62% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 3.08% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 3.08% | |
| 🙈 | 2 | 3.08% | |
| 🤓 | 2 | 3.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Если вы думаете, что сделали максимально стерильную рекламную кампанию и никого не оскорбили — в 99% вы ошибаетесь. Кто-нибудь обязательно обидится. На днях российский обувной бренд «Эконика» запустил рекламную кампанию с Роузи Хантингтон-Уайтли в качестве лица новой коллекции. Фотографии появились на сайте бренда, в Telegram-канале и наружной рекламе в Москве. После распространения информации о сотрудничестве час…
🌚1
Самое интересное на канале за июль ⭐️ AI меняет путь к доверию Нейросети становятся не новым узлом, но посредником между брендом и человеком: они не просто ищут информацию, а формируют готовое мнение. При этом одной выдачи Google уже недостаточно — репутация распределяется между поиском, LLM, отзывами, соцсетями и площадками. ⭐️ SXO вместо классического SEO + SERM Пользователь принимает решение ещё до перехода на с…
👍3
Posted without readable text
👍5
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
🤓2😁2🙈2
Некоторое время назад ваш покорный репутант вместе с другими лидерами ORM-рынка ответил на ряд любопытнейших вопросов в попытке понять какой он — рынок ORM в России в 2026 году. И вот этот прекрасный и большой материал от SidorinLab наконец-то вышел. Внутри вы найдёте не только ответы на вопросы, что уже устарело, что нас ждёт впереди и как ORM выглядит сегодня, но и мнения от ведущих специалистов рынка из Ашманов и…
❤5
Posted without readable text
👍2
Photo, posted without a caption
🤣3
Эх, Олег-Олег...
😁5
Posted without readable text
💯1🔥1
Posted without readable text
🔥4
А парень в курсе?
😐1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @typicalreputation. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Типичный репутант” (@typicalreputation), 193 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/typicalreputation.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.