Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 6 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 13 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 2 of the 39 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 942 comparable posts for this entry, running 16 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 13, the earliest publisher we hold is @Yaxshi_Yomon. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 12 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
61 measurements spanning 92 days, net -6,220. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 994,802–1,077,536 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 07:10
1,022,422
-3,199
5 Nov 2026, 07:36
1,025,621
-1,594
4 Nov 2026, 05:57
1,027,215
-2,519
3 Nov 2026, 08:29
1,029,734
-2,195
2 Nov 2026, 10:39
1,031,929
-1,008
1 Nov 2026, 13:55
1,032,937
-3,248
31 Oct 2026, 13:47
1,036,185
-6,875
30 Oct 2026, 13:20
1,043,060
-6,844
29 Oct 2026, 10:15
1,049,904
-11,237
28 Oct 2026, 06:46
1,061,141
+1,954
27 Oct 2026, 04:57
1,059,187
+8,782
26 Oct 2026, 02:20
1,050,405
+29,389
25 Oct 2026, 00:05
1,021,016
+15,243
23 Oct 2026, 23:35
1,005,773
-833
22 Oct 2026, 23:47
1,006,606
-23,188
21 Oct 2026, 23:41
1,029,794
+24,134
20 Oct 2026, 19:49
1,005,660
-7,539
19 Oct 2026, 20:07
1,013,199
-2,656
18 Oct 2026, 19:40
1,015,855
-825
17 Oct 2026, 19:56
1,016,680
first reading
Engagement
4,067 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 262 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.95%
avg views ÷ 1,022,422 subscribers
Avg views / post
91,500
1,022 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1,022
of 4,067 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
4,067 (16 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
93,468,837
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 06:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
12h 54m
Average length
1m 11s
Measured directly from 652 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 421 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days (5 of the 24-hour readings behind this are interpolated, not measured directly): across 296 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 1.6 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 40.3% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 80.9% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 108,000 views — 10.5% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 122,000).
8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
60 minutes: 15,186 interp. → 3.0 hours: 23,348 interp. → 6.0 hours: 36,000still climbing at last reading
not yet at 24h
86 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 744 of 1,022 posts held from the last 30 days (72.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#ДАҲШАТ
⚡️Туркияда қуролли шахс одамларга қарата ўт очди, саккиз киши қурбон бўлди😱
Учта турли машинада бўлган қурбонлар ўртасида ҳеч қандай боғлиқлик йўқ эди. Улардан иккитаси бир мактабда ишлайдиган ўқитувчилар бўлган.
⚡️TELEGRAM_YULDUZLARI - ЁШ БОЛАЛАРГА ТАҚИҚЛАНАДИ! КАТТАЛАР УЧУН! БИЗГА ҚЎШИЛИНГ!
Вақт — биз ўйлагандан анча тез ўтиб кетмоқда. Муҳими у қанча қолгани эмас, балки ким билан ва қандай яхши амаллар билан ўтказаётганимизда...
🍂 Ўйлаб кўришга арзийдиган видео.
⚡️TELEGRAM_YULDUZLARI - ЁШ БОЛАЛАРГА ТАҚИҚЛАНАДИ! КАТТАЛАР УЧУН! БИЗГА ҚЎШИЛИНГ!
📊Диққат сўровнома! Бизга сизнинг фикрингиз муҳим! Салқин ичимликлар мавзусидаги сўровномада иштирок этинг ва қуйидаги қимматли совғалардан бирига эга бўлиш имкониятини қўлга киритинг ‼️
➡️ Samsung A57 смартфони;
➡️ Redmi Note 15 Pro смартфони;
➡️ Apple Airpods 4 қулоқчини;
➡️ Яндекс Станция мини ақлли колонкаси;
➡️ Mi Band 10 фитнес соати;
Сўровнома маркетинг тадқиқоти учун ўтказилмоқда ва шахсий маълумотлар сир с…
#Фойдали
❗️Уй шароитида энг осон усул орқали ҳозирги "Вирусли Шамоллаш" га фойда берадиган РЕЦЕПТни ўрганиб олинг.
Яқинларга ҳам юбориб қўйинг.
⚡️TELEGRAM_YULDUZLARI - ЁШ БОЛАЛАРГА ТАҚИҚЛАНАДИ! КАТТАЛАР УЧУН! БИЗГА ҚЎШИЛИНГ!
💥Бугун, 6-ноябр, Бефарқлик куни
Яқинларингиз орасида “боқибеғам“лар бор бўлса, уларни табриклашингиз мумкин. Сабаби, бугун айнан уларнинг “касб“ байрами.
💆♂️Баъзан, ҳаётдаги ташвиш, ғам ва кўнгилни ҳира қиладиган ишларга шунчаки бепарво бўлиш ва ғам еявермаслик - инсонни умрини узайтиради.
🧘🏻♂️🧘🏻♀️Сиз ҳам стресс ва депрессияга тушмаслик учун, бугун бепарво режимни ёқиб олинг!
⚡️TELEGRAM_YULDUZLARI - ЁШ БОЛАЛАР…
#ТEЗКОР 2-ВИДЕО
⚡️⚡️Марат Ҳамдамовнинг турмуш ўртоғи ва Имарат уйларининг сотув рекламаларида фаол бўлган Шахзода Муҳамедова БОР ҲАҚИҚАТНИ ОЧИБ ТАШЛАДИ
Унинг айтишича, Маратнинг асосий шериги ва таъсисчи Жасур Азизов компаниядан тушган пулларга Лондондан хотини номига 12 миллион долларлик кўчмас мулк харид қилган ҳам экан😳
⚡️TELEGRAM_YULDUZLARI - ЁШ БОЛАЛАРГА ТАҚИҚЛАНАДИ! КАТТАЛАР УЧУН! БИЗГА ҚЎШИЛИНГ!
Showing the 12 most recent of 4,067 posts we hold for @tyuzbek. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@tyuzbek edited 66 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
7 August 2026
Most recent edit
3 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 11 posts on @tyuzbek as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
15 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
1 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
3.9 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
4
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 101 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
7
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
7
vacant every time we have ever looked
@tyuzbek named 7 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@sputnikuzbek named in 2 posts, 24 September 2026 – 29 October 2026
@donercihamdiusta_uz named in 1 post, 15 October 2026 – 15 October 2026
@bydauto named in 1 post, 2 October 2026 – 2 October 2026
@weellmar named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@metalandsteklo named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@iroda_sazan named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@pepsi_uzbekistan named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
KINO OVOZ PARÇALARI @kinoovozparchalari · 20,377 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 4 October 2026
INSTAGRAM YULDUZLARI @instagram_yulduzlarim · 124,530 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 1 October 2026
🎥 AUDIOLAR 🔊 @AUDIO_HAZLLAR · 91,724 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 1 October 2026
SAMARQANDLIKLAR 24 @Samarqandliklar24_Samarkand · 20,099 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 26 September 2026
🎥 Drakauz 🌀 | Расмий канал 🔥 @drakauz · 24,314 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 15 September 2026
🎞 UZB PRIKOL VIDEOLAR 🎥 @UZBVIDEO_prikolar · 23,767 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 13 September 2026
MUNISA RIZAEVA OFFICIAL @munisarizayevaplus · 24,791 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 30 here — alongside 29 others — read 12 September 2026
SAMARQANDLIKLAR @Samarqandliklar_urgut_samarkand · 17,649 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 11 September 2026
VODIYLIKLAR @Vodiyliklar_Elonlar_Bozori_Qoqon · 26,833 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 11 September 2026
Doniyor Qori @doniyorqori · 27,810 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 10 September 2026
AXBOROT LIVE | Расмий канал @axborot_shopirlar · 23,735 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 7 September 2026
Педиатрия @Pediatriya_24 · 29,346 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 6 September 2026
Қорахабар | Тезкор Хабарлар @koraxabar · 248,181 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 5 September 2026
Kun Yangiliklari 24 - Tezkor Xabarlar @kun_yangiliklari24_xabarlar_uz · 30,381 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 5 September 2026
Dunyo Uz | Tezkor Xabarlar @Yangiliklari24uz · 141,812 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 3 September 2026
KAZINO UZ @aviator_omad · 238,928 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 2 September 2026
Jahongir Latipov 💵 @latipovjahongir · 37,537 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 1 September 2026
⏰ NAMOZ VAQTLARI [TOSHKENT] @namoz_vaqtlari_1437 · 37,136 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 1 September 2026
DENOV YANGILIKLARI @Denov_Yangiliklari_666 · 37,188 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 31 August 2026
BESTMEDIAUZ 🎶ᵐᵘˢᶦᶜ ²⁰²⁶ @bestmediauz · 71,264 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 29 August 2026
Carrozzeria music @carrozzeria_mp3_rasmiy · 38,881 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 31 here — alongside 30 others — read 29 August 2026
Abdulloh Domla | Ибратли видеолар @ibratlik · 42,070 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 27 August 2026
XABARLAR | Расмий Канал @xabarlar · 46,844 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 25 August 2026
TOSHKENT 24 | TEZKOR XABARLARI @toshkent · 204,127 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 503 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
79 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Telegram_Yulduzlari| Расмий канал” (@tyuzbek), 1,022,422 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tyuzbek.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
