تصميم مواقع | UI/UX pinned «مقالات كثيرة تخص تجربة المستخدم ستكون هنا 👇🏻 https://t.me/arabicux سنشارك مقالات متخصصة في مجالات تجربة المستخدم، من الأساسيات إلى المفاهيم المتقدمة💡»

Channel
تصميم مواقع | UI/UX
@uix_design
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,856subscribers
-52 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001210913649 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @uix_design |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 30 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/uix_design |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 18:16 | 11,856 | -4 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:58 | 11,860 | -4 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 05:18 | 11,864 | -7 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 20:59 | 11,871 | -11 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 13:40 | 11,882 | -2 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 01:00 | 11,884 | -6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 15:37 | 11,890 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 12:08 | 11,891 | -4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:27 | 11,895 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:27 | 11,896 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:56 | 11,898 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:27 | 11,897 | +3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 11,894 | -7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:37 | 11,901 | -4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 11,905 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:27 | 11,904 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 11,909 | +3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 08:23 | 11,906 | +1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 08:53 | 11,905 | -7 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 11,912 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 1 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 6s
- Average length
- 6s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
219 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 128 | 58.4% | |
| 👏 | 60 | 27.4% | |
| 🤩 | 16 | 7.31% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 4.11% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 1.37% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 1.37% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 219 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2025 to 15 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
مقالات كثيرة تخص تجربة المستخدم ستكون هنا 👇🏻 https://t.me/arabicux سنشارك مقالات متخصصة في مجالات تجربة المستخدم، من الأساسيات إلى المفاهيم المتقدمة💡
❤23🥰2
Signed حَكمْ
في الآونة الأخيرة لاحظت أن في عملاء ترسل لي مشاريعها على الموقع من خلال صفحة تسعير المشاريع ولكن لازم بشكل دوري أدخل على لوحة التحكم ولان ما عندي نظام اشعارات في لوحة التحكم فلازم أحدث الصفحة كل فترة وفترة ثم خطر ببالي إني أربط الفورم بتلجرام Bot وطلعت النتيجة بهذا الشكل 🔥 وحتى أسهل مما تخيلت 😅
❤22🤩7🔥4
Signed حَكمْ
أفكر أطلق ورشة جديدة هذه الفترة ما رأيكم ؟ بتكون للاشخاص الي خلصوا فترة التعلم ولكن ما طبقوا الي تعلموه وما عندهم مشاريع أو أعمال .
👏59❤29🤩7
Signed حَكمْ
🙄
- Amaz UI24%
- Bento grid UI52%
- Minimal UI24%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤5🥰1
Signed حَكمْ
#ترند 02 ما اسم هذا النوع من تصاميم الواجهات ؟
❤1
Signed حَكمْ
https://linktr.ee/hkmDesigner
Signed حَكمْ
🙄
- Colorless UI46%
- Clean UI24%
- Minimal UI30%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed حَكمْ
#ترند 01 ما اسم هذا النوع من تصاميم الواجهات ؟
❤3
Signed حَكمْ
🚀 من تصاميمي السابقة لموقعي شخصي ، تقدرون تستخدمونه لعرض أعمالكم كمصممين أو مبرمجين! ✨ القالب جاهز ومجاني تمامًا، وحاولت يكون خفيف وسهل التعديل لأي أحد حاب يبدأ يجهز بروفايله الشخصي. 🔗 تقدر تحمّله من هنا: https://hkmdesigner.gumroad.com/l/qjqwt 🔧 بيكون مفيد لك لو: - حابب تعرض شغلك بطريقة مرتبة - تجهز موقعك الشخصي بسرعة - تبدأ أول تجربة لك مع مواقع الويب وإذا أعجبك شاركه مع أصحابك 🙌🔥
❤9🔥2
Signed حَكمْ
بودكاست يلخص ببساطة وسلاسة واحد من أهم الكتب في مجال تجربة المستخدم "Don't Make Me Think" حتى لو ما قرأت الكتاب من قبل، اسمع أول حلقة رح تعطيك فكرة واضحة وتسهل عليك قراءة وفهم الكتاب بعدين. ✨ للمزيد عن التصميم والبرمجة 👇🏻 ⛓️💥 Insta - X (Twitter) - Whatsapp @uix_design
❤7🤩2👏1
Signed حَكمْ
تعرف أن عندنا مجموعة تجمع المبرمجين والمصممين مع أصحاب المشاريع وبأكثر من 1.3K عضو 🤩👇🏻 https://t.me/ar_freelancers
Signed حَكمْ
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @uix_design. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🙄
- Amaz UI24%
- Bento grid UI52%
- Minimal UI24%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🙄
- Colorless UI46%
- Clean UI24%
- Minimal UI30%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
هل جربتم بلندر في تصميم الواجهات ؟
- نعم7%
- لا58%
- أول مرة أسمع بيه 🙂↕️36%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2025 to 15 April 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@FoodofDesigner · 34,715
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 2 September 2026
@Design3A · 26,287
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 12 September 2026
@ba3i2 · 33,011
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 4 September 2026
@codingbasics · 22,100
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 21 September 2026
@zedniiy · 116,705
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 August 2026
@book10 · 22,376
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 September 2026
@abodate_1 · 1
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تصميم مواقع | UI/UX” (@uix_design), 11,856 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uix_design.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.