Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for КАТЯ УЛАНСКАЯ

Channel

КАТЯ УЛАНСКАЯ

@ulanskayakate

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

36,132subscribers

-631 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002033336452
TypeChannel
Username@ulanskayakate
DescriptionСОТРУДНИЧЕСТВО @ttani_pr Регистрация канала РКН https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/688b5afd4b40c72af967a015
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ulanskayakate

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

36,13236,76336,447.57 August 2026 — 36,763 subscribers7 August 2026 — 36,763 subscribers7 August 2026 — 36,761 subscribers8 August 2026 — 36,747 subscribers9 August 2026 — 36,712 subscribers10 August 2026 — 36,691 subscribers11 August 2026 — 36,669 subscribers13 August 2026 — 36,649 subscribers14 August 2026 — 36,609 subscribers16 August 2026 — 36,595 subscribers17 August 2026 — 36,575 subscribers18 August 2026 — 36,550 subscribers19 August 2026 — 36,533 subscribers21 August 2026 — 36,519 subscribers22 August 2026 — 36,508 subscribers23 August 2026 — 36,488 subscribers25 August 2026 — 36,471 subscribers26 August 2026 — 36,441 subscribers27 August 2026 — 36,420 subscribers28 August 2026 — 36,410 subscribers29 August 2026 — 36,396 subscribers30 August 2026 — 36,367 subscribers31 August 2026 — 36,349 subscribers1 September 2026 — 36,337 subscribers2 September 2026 — 36,323 subscribers3 September 2026 — 36,309 subscribers4 September 2026 — 36,308 subscribers8 September 2026 — 36,296 subscribers11 September 2026 — 36,238 subscribers12 September 2026 — 36,222 subscribers14 September 2026 — 36,217 subscribers16 September 2026 — 36,184 subscribers18 September 2026 — 36,132 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net -631. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,037–36,858 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 16:1936,132-52
16 Sept 2026, 08:4136,184-33
14 Sept 2026, 11:3736,217-5
12 Sept 2026, 23:1536,222-16
11 Sept 2026, 02:3636,238-58
8 Sept 2026, 00:4036,296-12
4 Sept 2026, 20:1636,308-1
3 Sept 2026, 08:3336,309-14
2 Sept 2026, 04:4636,323-14
1 Sept 2026, 05:4636,337-12
31 Aug 2026, 08:3836,349-18
30 Aug 2026, 11:4536,367-29
29 Aug 2026, 09:2736,396-14
28 Aug 2026, 08:5336,410-10
27 Aug 2026, 08:1836,420-21
26 Aug 2026, 06:1136,441-30
25 Aug 2026, 02:3436,471-17
23 Aug 2026, 20:4736,488-20
22 Aug 2026, 06:1536,508-11
21 Aug 2026, 00:2436,519first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 81 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.4%
avg views ÷ 36,132 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,190
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.87%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 28 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held28 (29 July 202622 September 2026)
Views total77,840
Reactions total1,455
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Sept 2026, 14:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,400
Videos
682
Links
551

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
12m 02s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,911 reactions across 28 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,78161.2%
🔥62121.3%
❤‍🔥2307.90%
🐳953.26%
😁792.71%
🥰411.41%
👍301.03%
💯150.515%
👏80.275%
😍80.275%
👌30.103%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,911 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
27
across the posts below
Posts paid on
26
of 28 we hold a reading for · 93%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ulanskayakate. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
3.57%
1 of 28 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
5,540
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
5,350
over 27 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFGKvtTj114 August 202614 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 22 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

22 Sept 2026, 08:26 UTC≈2,550 views54 reactions1 Starread 23 September 2026
Photo

Органично вписываю Арчика в блог 🫴🏼 знаю, вам нужно) - пришла посылка от BUNGLY - тот самый бренд для парных образов с нашими миниками 🥹 Арчику урвала - куртку « папоротник» с меховым подкладом [ мембранная ткань, ветрозащита, удлиненная спинка, плотные манжеты- все на уровне] - к ней демисезонные брюки «орех» с мягких утеплителем, огромными карманами для сбора урожая улиц 😁 и тоже из мембраны, разумеется. - шл

🔥3222

Signed Катерина Уланская

20 Sept 2026, 11:48 UTC≈3,790 views122 reactions1 Starread 23 September 2026
Photo

Здравствуйте, на связи мой цветущий кризис 30 😄 - с одной стороны 3 прокола, с другой два. уже жду, когда смогу поменять медицинские серьги на красивый сет 🤤

82🔥38🐳2

Signed Катерина Уланская

19 Sept 2026, 13:47 UTC≈4,370 views82 reactions1 Starread 23 September 2026
Photo

Атлас в осенних образах одно из самых красивых текстурных сочетаний осени. я так никогда не убираю его из гардероба, это и на мероприятие и в повседневке. Короче- обожаю! - 3тий год беру брюки и топы у этого бренда, в прошлом году делала 3 обзора с ними и все они улетали в млн просмотры. струящийся и качественный атлас,в составе есть даже шелк, но при этом все так же по доступной цене 🤌🏽 Брюки на Ozon Брюки на W

🔥4726🐳9

Signed Катерина Уланская

18 Sept 2026, 09:38 UTC≈4,750 views72 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Последнии покупки 🫴🏼 Куртка с меховым воротником [ я в тренде! Нравится это направление в стиле , но найти искусственный мех без «дешевизны» и не продать при этом почку- было сложно, но у меня получилось + мех отстегивается 💅🏽] Красный кардиган с цветочным узором [ очень приятный тактильно, женственный, акцентный, в мой монохромный гардероб влетел с ноги ] Серый кардиган с высоким горлом [ искала именно текстурны

❤‍🔥4029🐳3

Signed Катерина Уланская

17 Sept 2026, 14:11 UTC≈4,480 views96 reactions1 Starread 22 September 2026
Photo

Для комфортной осени 🫂 Джемпер Брюки Лоферы [ больше нет, к сожалению] Тренч Шарф Шапка Митенки

70🔥22👍4

Signed Катерина Уланская

16 Sept 2026, 17:47 UTC≈5,180 views99 reactions1 Starread 22 September 2026
Video

Мысль дня 🙇🏽‍♀️ Почему то, проще поделиться неудачей, чем удачей. Сравнила бы это с тем, как идти задом наперед. Вроде возможно, но как то неудобно. смиренно жду ваши мысли.

🔥5232🐳7❤‍🔥4💯4

Signed Катерина Уланская

15 Sept 2026, 05:47 UTC≈5,700 views105 reactions1 Starread 22 September 2026
Photo

Показала, как можно внедрить в повседневные спортшиковские образы свитшот и джоггеры 🫴🏼 свитшот и брюки ONSI бежевый тренч WB черный плащ WB белые джинсы WB рубашка в клетку WB пиджак черный Lamoda юбка черная WB юбка шифоновая WB

79🔥19🐳6❤‍🔥1

Signed Катерина Уланская

8 Sept 2026, 11:37 UTC≈7,180 views136 reactions1 Starread 19 September 2026
Photo

Ну и вторая новость - первый разговорный reels переодевашка Арчика😁 * ну вот так вот у него получилось по образу: шапка + шарф + перчатки BEREG бомбер WB ботинки WB штаны [ не помню]

103🔥17🥰10😁5❤‍🔥1

Signed Катерина Уланская

8 Sept 2026, 11:30 UTC≈6,400 views82 reactions1 Starread 19 September 2026
Photo

У меня крокодил головного мозга! - не спасайте, я там, где хочу быть 🐊 на мне: тренч SELFMADE юбка Befree WB сапоги NEXUDE WB примечательно, что животный принт давно трендит, мне нравится еще зебра, но как будто бы не вижу его на себе, змеиный нравится на других, но на себя не могу [ жутко, змеи моя фобия, даже на слух мурашит] а вот крокодил… в самое сердце. какие у вас отношения с этим направлением? нравится чт

60🔥14🐳6❤‍🔥1😍1

Signed Катерина Уланская

1 Sept 2026, 12:22 UTC≈5,690 views101 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Video

Обещанный туториал - как я делаю маникюр дома 💅🏽 а у вас какие отношения с покрытием гель-лаком? Я вот 10 лет плотно сидела. сейчас экономия времени, денЯг и нет бесячей отросшей границы геля. короче жирненький лайк! Смарт пилку нашла на WB [ в ней еще насадка и диски есть для пяток] Набор для домашнего маникюра

78🔥17🐳6

Signed Катерина Уланская

29 Aug 2026, 19:42 UTC≈6,070 views125 reactions1 Starread 10 September 2026
Photo

Порция полезности для вас гардеробные помощники для щепотки стиля в осенних образах. - манжеты - воротнички белый черный - майки - джемперы

86🔥31💯6👌1👍1

Signed Катерина Уланская

29 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC≈5,230 views160 reactions1 Starread 8 September 2026
Photo

Я вчера была невестой, которая 10 лет назад не сбежала таки 🔗😁 -со спины я сама в шоке! по образу: платье Zarina куртка Sela туфли из натуральной кожи с WB

122🔥30🥰6🐳1👍1

Signed Катерина Уланская

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @ulanskayakate. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

angelinaprobeauty
@angelinaprobeauty · 76,829
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 30 here — alongside 29 others — read 23 August 2026
Серго нашел,я купил
@sergonashel · 86,100
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 23 August 2026
Стилист Мария Милютина | Marimi
@marimi_stile · 29,288
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 8 September 2026
nosachevastyle
@nosachevastyle · 72,086
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“КАТЯ УЛАНСКАЯ” (@ulanskayakate), 36,132 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ulanskayakate.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.