Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ULTRA 2.0

Channel

ULTRA 2.0

@ultraparisiens

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

106,950subscribers

+487 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001480393201
TypeChannel
Username@ultraparisiens
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ultraparisiens

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@ultraparisiens/7282 · this entry30 Jul 2026, 17:27 UTC@bagarrefightbasto/85330 Jul 2026, 17:27 UTC1.00under a minute
@bagarrefightbasto/8592 Aug 2026, 17:32 UTC@ultraparisiens/7289 · this entry2 Aug 2026, 17:32 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@bagarrefightbasto5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@bagarrefightbasto (32)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 11 comparable posts for this entry, running 30 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @bagarrefightbasto. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

106,463110,724108,593.57 August 2026 — 106,463 subscribers7 August 2026 — 106,463 subscribers8 August 2026 — 106,959 subscribers9 August 2026 — 107,450 subscribers9 August 2026 — 107,876 subscribers11 August 2026 — 108,187 subscribers12 August 2026 — 108,422 subscribers13 August 2026 — 108,494 subscribers14 August 2026 — 108,657 subscribers15 August 2026 — 108,815 subscribers16 August 2026 — 109,016 subscribers17 August 2026 — 109,147 subscribers18 August 2026 — 109,430 subscribers19 August 2026 — 109,612 subscribers20 August 2026 — 109,821 subscribers22 August 2026 — 109,963 subscribers23 August 2026 — 110,229 subscribers24 August 2026 — 110,568 subscribers26 August 2026 — 110,574 subscribers27 August 2026 — 110,655 subscribers28 August 2026 — 110,724 subscribers29 August 2026 — 110,653 subscribers30 August 2026 — 110,471 subscribers31 August 2026 — 110,223 subscribers1 September 2026 — 109,980 subscribers2 September 2026 — 109,765 subscribers3 September 2026 — 109,511 subscribers5 September 2026 — 109,185 subscribers8 September 2026 — 108,525 subscribers11 September 2026 — 108,034 subscribers13 September 2026 — 107,769 subscribers14 September 2026 — 107,501 subscribers16 September 2026 — 107,226 subscribers18 September 2026 — 106,950 subscribers106,9507 August 202618 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net +487. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 105,824–111,363 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 18:01106,950-276
16 Sept 2026, 11:37107,226-275
14 Sept 2026, 12:54107,501-268
13 Sept 2026, 00:21107,769-265
11 Sept 2026, 02:57108,034-491
8 Sept 2026, 03:38108,525-660
5 Sept 2026, 03:00109,185-326
3 Sept 2026, 10:03109,511-254
2 Sept 2026, 03:48109,765-215
1 Sept 2026, 06:58109,980-243
31 Aug 2026, 06:27110,223-248
30 Aug 2026, 05:18110,471-182
29 Aug 2026, 02:15110,653-71
28 Aug 2026, 04:02110,724+69
27 Aug 2026, 03:24110,655+81
26 Aug 2026, 01:13110,574+6
24 Aug 2026, 23:37110,568+339
23 Aug 2026, 13:36110,229+266
22 Aug 2026, 03:06109,963+142
20 Aug 2026, 23:15109,821first reading

Engagement

114 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 99 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.22%
avg views ÷ 106,950 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,510
63 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
63
of 114 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held114 (30 July 202622 September 2026)
Views total284,105
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Sept 2026, 09:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
497
Videos
4,240
Links
3,030

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
52m 43s
Average length
40s

Measured directly from 80 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

22 Sept 2026, 11:52 UTC≈2,260 viewsread 23 September 2026
Video

🚨🇫🇷 DUNKERQUE : SON PÈRE RETROUVÉ MORT DANS LES TOILETTES D’UN KFC Un an après la mort d’Issam Zouhairi, 46 ans, retrouvé sans vie dans les toilettes PMR d’un KFC à Dunkerque, son fils prend la parole. Disparu pendant plus de 30 heures, Issam avait finalement été retrouvé par sa propre famille, après d’importantes recherches. Aujourd’hui, ses proches dénoncent une situation qu’ils jugent incompréhensible et vienne

22 Sept 2026, 10:28 UTC585 viewsread 23 September 2026
Photo

⚽️ L’un des seuls canal fiable de match truqué, avec de vrais informations 100% fiable ! PAS DE GROUPE PRIVÉE OU PAYANT ! RIEN À PAYER À L’AVANCE, JUSTE 10% DE TON GAIN APRÈS LE MATCH ! D’ailleurs une cote a 32 est disponible pour aujourd’hui et c’est posté publiquement ! ⬇️ https://t.me/+RJrbEPYvJMBiNGY0 ✔️

21 Sept 2026, 11:55 UTC≈3,170 viewsread 23 September 2026
Video

Le premier combat « Humain VS Robot Terminator » a eu lieu.

20 Sept 2026, 19:20 UTC≈3,650 viewsread 23 September 2026
Video

⚠️❗️🇺🇸 Un soignant a été filmé en train de verser de l'eau de Javel dans la bouteille d'eau d'un homme handicapé à Lake Charles, en Louisiane, le 14 septembre. Reginald Wilson, 30 ans, a secoué la bouteille et l'a remise à l'homme pour qu'il boive. La victime a remarqué le goût de l'eau de Javel, et Wilson a ensuite été arrêté.

20 Sept 2026, 18:05 UTC≈2,450 viewsread 23 September 2026

Avec un vieux Samsung j’ai fais 1 448,40€ demain je vais chez Apple je prend le dernier iPhone

20 Sept 2026, 16:55 UTC≈2,510 viewsread 23 September 2026
Forwarded from @AstuceCasinoFiableeVideo

⚽️ 𝗝𝗘𝗨 𝗗𝗨 𝗣𝗘𝗡𝗔𝗟𝗧𝗬 ⚽️ J'ouvre lappli, 2 parties et boooom + 900 et +300€ en 30 secondes 🤪🎄 Une passoire le gardien 😂 ➡️ TIRE TON PENALTY ICI (Ton 1er dépôt est doublé jusqu'à 500€ maximum 🎁)

20 Sept 2026, 10:35 UTC≈3,610 viewsread 23 September 2026

IL A VALIDÉ HIER ✅ COTE A 29.00 POUR AJD 100% GRATUIT, J’ENLÈVE DANS 5 MINUTES ⤵️⤵️⤵️ https://t.me/+RJrbEPYvJMBiNGY0

19 Sept 2026, 10:24 UTC≈1,190 viewsread 23 September 2026
Photo

⚽️ L’un des seuls canal fiable de match truqué, avec de vrais informations 100% fiable ! PAS DE GROUPE PRIVÉE OU PAYANT ! RIEN À PAYER À L’AVANCE, JUSTE 10% DE TON GAIN APRÈS LE MATCH ! D’ailleurs une cote a 32 est disponible pour aujourd’hui et c’est posté publiquement ! ⬇️ https://t.me/+RJrbEPYvJMBiNGY0 ✔️

18 Sept 2026, 18:47 UTC≈4,170 viewsread 23 September 2026
Video

Condamné à un an de prison, il casse ses menottes et se bat avec les vigiles en pleine évasion

Showing the 12 most recent of 114 posts we hold for @ultraparisiens. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ULTRA 2.0” (@ultraparisiens), 106,950 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ultraparisiens.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.