Channel
@umia_finance
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
777subscribers
+539 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003518289836 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @umia_finance |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 24 February 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/umia_finance |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 12:40 | 777 | +18 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 06:18 | 759 | +128 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:05 | 631 | +172 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:19 | 459 | +56 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:05 | 403 | +148 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:18 | 255 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:41 | 255 | +17 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 238 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
184 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 103 | 56.0% | |
| ❤ | 70 | 38.0% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 1.63% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 1.63% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 1.09% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.543% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.543% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.543% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 184 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 February 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
It’s time to put our token where our mouth is. We built Umia’s system to make tokens central to a project’s strategy and structure, and we will be no different. Announcing the $UMIA tokenomics, our first token launch, live at the End of August. $UMIA Decision Markets will be pivotal to drive the direction of the protocol. These Markets will have a direct say over the treasury spending of the protocol, strategic d…
🔥28❤2👌2👏1🥰1
💻UMIA TESTNET IS LIVE https://app.testnet.umia.finance/ Umia is redefining tokens: how they are launched, how they are governed, and how they are structured. Now, you can see it for yourself. Read about it more here: https://x.com/umia_finance/status/2082892892759298178
🔥32❤6👍3👏1
📝 How Tokens Rug You (and how Umia prevents it) Welcome traveller, to the rug emporium. Come see what’s in store. On the surface, all token rugs might seem the same; after all, they all unilaterally take value away from the tokenholder. With Umia, our main goal is to make tokens aligned with the projects behind them, and that is simply not possible when tokens are set up in an extractive way. Let's walk through the …
❤9
We have updated our docs! From the fundamental issues we are trying to solve to how the decision markets function, our new docs dive deep into why Umia will revolutionise tokens https://umia.finance/docs
❤13👀1
discuss! https://x.com/nftboi_/status/2067408447277310080
Just dropped an article explaining how and why we leverage Uniswap CCA + zkTLS in our launch flows. Read more about our Tailored Auctions here: https://x.com/umia_finance/status/2064728570446901266
🔥9
All for one, and One for All. Umia's novel legal structure makes sure that every project is driven by only one legal entity, itself controlled only by one token. No more setups where nobody knows who owns what. Read more about it in our latest article! https://x.com/umia_finance/status/2062627429793906901
❤11
Each project choosing to build on Umia represents a conscious choice to give tokenholders an actual say. Once Umia's framework is released, it will be hard to justify older, trust-based token models. https://x.com/umia_finance/status/2059628715194134807
❤1
With its novel legal setup, Umia unlocks a type of company where an Agent can actually co-found, govern and manage a project. All of this while tokenholders can make sure the treasury is noncustodially controlled, and they have a real say. cyber•Fund's latest research report outlines how Umia is uniquely positioned in the world of Agent-scaled ventures: https://x.com/umia_finance/status/2054957493453717874
❤4🔥2👏1
Umia Finance pinned a photo
INTRODUCING UMIA SCORE: PRICE YOUR POTENTIAL https://app.umia.finance/score Building a project has never been easier. Knowing what it's worth? That's still the hard part. Umia Score fixes that. Submit your project, get a Token Potential Value (TPV), verify your data, and land on the leaderboard. Top 100 verified projects earn Umia tokens. For those who score in the top 100: this batch allocates 0.4% of Umia's tota…
🔥7❤2
Thanks to MetaLeX_Labs , each project on Umia will be able to launch as a legal entity. All of the company's onchain and offchain components driven by the token’s decision markets. The future of venture creation and growth will be onchain! Read more here: https://docs.umia.finance/docs/legal-framework
❤4⚡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @umia_finance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Umia Finance” (@umia_finance), 777 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/umia_finance.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.