💀 Админ RSOTM, спасибо за репосты, парни всегда рады и передают большой привет! Смотрели и смотрят! Саня, ТАРАН ДОНБАССА, спасибо тебе за постоянную поддержку! Лови момент | Глава II
custom 540215895236648123775❤30🫡18👍13

Channel
@unglava2
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,686subscribers
+1,540 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001877220025 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @unglava2 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/unglava2 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 38% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
6,570 average views per post against 6,686 subscribers — an engagement rate of 98.3%. Across the 13,723 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,169–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 7.04% and 25.6%, with a median of 13.9%.
| Window | 30 days (5 October 2026 – 4 November 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 16 of 16 published in the window (0 exact, 16 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 105,150 |
| Mature posts only | 98.3% over 16 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 6,686 measured 2 November 2026 |
| Cohort | b3162:rus · 13,723 channels · p10 3.63% · p25 7.04% · p50 13.9% · p75 25.6% · p90 41.6% |
| Position in cohort | 99.198th percentile · 7.1× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.049% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Russian · 100.0% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 4 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Nov 2026, 03:27 | 6,686 | -3 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 01:20 | 6,689 | +17 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 11:16 | 6,672 | +48 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 00:34 | 6,624 | +21 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 15:49 | 6,603 | +20 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 23:46 | 6,583 | +19 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 06:10 | 6,564 | +36 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 02:54 | 6,528 | +129 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 14:18 | 6,399 | +122 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 01:22 | 6,277 | +262 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 04:16 | 6,015 | +78 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 15:01 | 5,937 | +57 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 23:22 | 5,880 | +56 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 18:20 | 5,824 | +90 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:23 | 5,734 | +35 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:37 | 5,699 | +38 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:24 | 5,661 | +48 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 04:29 | 5,613 | +68 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 18:59 | 5,545 | +73 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:56 | 5,472 | first reading |
52 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 52 (27 July 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 105,150 |
| Reactions total | 2,456 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 10:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5,492 reactions across 46 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 1,056 | 19.2% | |
| custom 5402158952366481237 | 964 | 17.6% | |
| ❤ | 793 | 14.4% | |
| 🫡 | 672 | 12.2% | |
| 🙏 | 617 | 11.2% | |
| 👍 | 365 | 6.65% | |
| 🔥 | 341 | 6.21% | |
| 💔 | 117 | 2.13% | |
| 😢 | 113 | 2.06% | |
| 🤬 | 101 | 1.84% | |
| ⚡ | 93 | 1.69% | |
| 🤝 | 62 | 1.13% | |
| 😁 | 50 | 0.91% | |
| 😡 | 38 | 0.692% | |
| 🤯 | 31 | 0.564% | |
| 👏 | 26 | 0.473% | |
| 🤔 | 23 | 0.419% | |
| ❤🔥 | 15 | 0.273% | |
| 🤷♂ | 10 | 0.182% | |
| 🤨 | 3 | 0.055% | |
| 1 further kind | 2 | 0.036% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 52 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,182 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 16 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
💀 Админ RSOTM, спасибо за репосты, парни всегда рады и передают большой привет! Смотрели и смотрят! Саня, ТАРАН ДОНБАССА, спасибо тебе за постоянную поддержку! Лови момент | Глава II
custom 540215895236648123775❤30🫡18👍13
Невошедшее. Часть 1. Лови момент | Глава II
❤47custom 540215895236648123731🫡21🔥7
Как работала разведка «Музыкантов»? Почему разведчикам приходилось идти впереди штурмовых групп и что происходило там, где каждый день мог стать последним? Герой нового выпуска — боец разведывательного взвода Компании, прошедший тяжёлые бои. Отдельно поговорили о внутренней жизни «Оркестра»: подготовке бойцов, отношениях внутри подразделения, командирах, фронтовом быте и товарищах, которые не вернулись домой. Исто…
🔥66custom 540215895236648123730❤17🫡10⚡1🤝1
Одна из причин, почему многие ветераны занимаются детьми. И не только ветераны. Дети — как губка, которая до определённого возраста впитывает всё вокруг. Именно тогда формируется фундамент ценностей. И тут не научился Ванечкой — Иваном Ивановичем не научишься. На это больно смотреть. Как в одной хорошей песне сказано: «Предок Витязя одиннадцатый день квасит, внучку Святогора трахают под Бенни Бенасси». Увы, но тут …
💯68🫡12custom 540215895236648123710🤬4🤔3❤1🤝1
Помимо съёмочного процесса есть ещё рутина, которая постоянно отвлекает. Есть обстоятельства к которым мы просто не готовы. К сожалению, эта неделя прошла без выпусков. Но работа не останавливается: были съёмки, много монтажа. Со следующей недели, думаю, вернёмся к привычному графику. Последнее время в напряжении держала ситуация с нашей студией. Расскажу небольшую предысторию. Очень показательный пример того, как …
🙏49❤14⚡12custom 54021589523664812378💯5👍3🔥2
Проводили нашего брата Михаила Фёдоровича Маваши 🙏🏼 Он много лет говорил с людьми о том, как важно оставаться собой, отвечать за свою семью, двор, свою землю. Не ждать, что кто-то придёт и всё исправит. Он объединил вокруг этой правды тысячи людей по всей стране — тех, кто устал от пустых разговоров и хотел действовать. Дал ориентиры и правильные смыслы, которых многим не хватало. Он создал «Северный человек», что…
🙏82💔55🫡35❤10
Вчера прошли похороны Михаила Фёдоровича. До сих пор не верится, что Миши с нами больше нет. Когда всё случилось, довольно крупные телеграм-каналы делали вбросы, говоря о том, что всё это инсценировка и Миша жив. Высмеивали пост с реквизитами. И ведь у этих мразей есть своя аудитория, довольно большая. Шулера из-за стола выгоняют по первой же меченой карте. Намерения этих великих блогеров даже обсуждать не хочется.…
🙏67🫡28💯19❤10🔥8🤔1
Продолжаем работу 💀 Скоро... Лови момент | Глава II
custom 540215895236648123756❤31🔥29🫡15🙏4⚡2👍1💔1
Тёмные времена, рождают сильных людей 💀
❤64custom 540215895236648123737🫡15👍10❤🔥8🔥4💯3👏2
Как писал ранее, у каждого из нас есть выбор, и от этого выбора, по сути, формируется наше общество. Мы часто думаем, что от нас ничего не зависит. Нам так внушили… Читать книги, заниматься спортом, строить бизнес — это такой же выбор, как и употреблять алкоголь, бездельничать, проживать жизнь бесцельно. Можно годами разрушать собственное здоровье, а потом удивляться, откуда взялись болезни. Можно годами ничему не …
❤54👍37💯30custom 54021589523664812378🫡7👏3🔥3🤷♂1
ВАЖНАЯ ИНФОРМАЦИЯ! Уважаемые друзья, посмотрите видео, пожалуйста! 1. Михаил погиб при пока ЕЩЕ не выясненных до конца трагических обстоятельствах, но он точно НЕ СОВЕРШАЛ СУИЦИД! Ответы на все вопросы будут по окончании следственных действий! 2. «Северному человеку» БЫТЬ и работать дальше. Все руководители всех городов готовы продолжать и усиливать работу организации. МЫ В СТРОЮ! 3. Желтая пресса и «хайпожоры» п…
🫡58🙏41❤13💯12💔6🤔2
На всякий случай расскажу чуть о себе. Здоровье в полном порядке, проходил обследование, в конце сентября пробежал Московский марафон — 42,2 км. Настроение бывает разное, с тоской смотрю на то, что происходит за окном, но суицидальных мыслей никогда не было, да и взяться им неоткуда. Живу в лучшем городе мира, занимаюсь любимым делом, общаюсь с интереснейшими людьми. Наоборот, понимаю, что сделал только 1% из того, …
💯116🙏49❤20🫡14🤝10👍7🔥3⚡2
Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @unglava2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 19 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ГЛАВА II” (@unglava2), 6,686 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/unglava2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.