Crypto & trading β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 90 days, net +5,535. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean βno change observedβ, never βinterpolatedβ. The vertical axis spans 5,852β17,537 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 07:50
13,186
+5
4 Nov 2026, 09:08
13,181
+3
3 Nov 2026, 09:51
13,178
-4
2 Nov 2026, 12:17
13,182
-5
1 Nov 2026, 10:28
13,187
-7
31 Oct 2026, 10:35
13,194
-8
30 Oct 2026, 07:54
13,202
-4
29 Oct 2026, 09:19
13,206
-6
28 Oct 2026, 07:51
13,212
-7
27 Oct 2026, 11:01
13,219
-6
26 Oct 2026, 11:45
13,225
-3
25 Oct 2026, 14:21
13,228
-2,919
24 Oct 2026, 15:14
16,147
-7
23 Oct 2026, 18:27
16,154
-9
22 Oct 2026, 15:19
16,163
-8
21 Oct 2026, 13:00
16,171
-18
20 Oct 2026, 08:45
16,189
+8,989
17 Oct 2026, 05:47
7,200
-13
13 Oct 2026, 19:37
7,213
-29
8 Oct 2026, 00:35
7,242
first reading
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 1 July 2024 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR Β· 30 days
192.8%
avg views Γ· 13,186 subscribers
Avg views / post
25,400
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.28%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held
24 (1 July 2024 β 2 November 2026)
Views total
101,700
Reactions total
4,354
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 06:39 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
56
Videos
2
Links
8
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 6 November 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
8,740 reactions across 24 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 8,740 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2024 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegramβs own βeditedβ marker: 0 of 4 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before β this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
π§ WHAT DOES AN ARBITRAGE SEARCHER ACTUALLY LOOK FOR?
Not every movement on a chart creates an arbitrage opportunity.
A typical MEV workflow has three important stages:
1οΈβ£ Observe: monitor pending transactions and changes in decentralized liquidity pools.
2οΈβ£ Evaluate: estimate the effect of a transaction and account for costs.
3οΈβ£ Execute: submit a trade only when the expected outcome justifies the risk.
Timing β¦
π BIG UPDATE: ARBITRAGE BOT IS NOW AVAILABLE ON MOBILE! π±
Dear community,
First of all, we sincerely apologize if you've had to wait longer than expected for a response from our support team.
π Our project is growing faster than ever! We're receiving hundreds of messages every day, and our team is doing its best to assist everyone as quickly as possible.
To improve response times, we're expanding our support teamβ¦
π YOUR FIRST ARBITRAGE BOT DOESNβT NEED A PRO PURCHASE
Curious about automated Ethereum arbitrage, but not ready to commit to advanced software?
Start with our Public / Free Version and learn the process before deciding whether PRO is right for you.
π€ Get now:
β The free bot tutorial
β Step-by-step YouTube walkthrough
β Setup information and code
β Help with installation questions
π Setup takes approximately β10 mβ¦
πΉ Youβve seen the results posts. But what would you actually be paying for?
If youβre considering PRO, start with one question:
βWhat changes compared with the public version?β
A profit screenshot gets your attention. A concrete difference gives you a reason to upgrade β³
π€ Bring your biggest question:
β’ Should I switch to the faster version?
β’ What would change in my setup?
β’ What does the price include?
β’ Which β¦
π Best Results of the Week!
Since the latest update of our MEV BOT v7.15, profitability has increased by +3.2% π
Here are the top results from our PRO users:
1st place - $135,289 profit, costs - $15,872
2nd place - $120,762 profit, costs - $13,482
3rd place - $109,456 profit, costs - $12,964
4th place - $52,734 profit, costs - $12,875
5th place - $44,910 profit, costs - $10,245
π Top FREE/Public Bot Users:
1st -β¦
π€ Recent Reviews From Bot Users β¬οΈ
Whether the market is booming to new highs or crashing hard, our arbitrage bot keeps delivering consistent results - year after year.
Ready to get started?
Watch the tutorial β DM support if you need any help.
π₯ [Video/Information & Code] - Ask support for YouTube link at @HelpArbitrage π
Want to try before buying PRO? Start FREE.
Try the free arbitrage bot with a step-by-step Yoβ¦
π¨ AFTER 3+ YEARS! OUR ARBITRAGE BOT IS STILL ALIVE AND STRONGER THAN EVER!
While 99% of bots die in the first 6 months⦠ours has been printing non-stop since 2022. Also, the liquidity pool of Uniswap has expanded and more spots are now available for the free version.
π Current stats (March 2026):
β’ Profitability right now: 9.86%
β’ Gas fees are the lowest in years π
β’ Transaction speed massively improved
β’ Works 24/β¦
πͺ Solana Arbitrage Bot
π We are thrilled to present the absolute best product on the market, created by the exceptional Arbitrage Development Team.
π This is the first arbitrage bot ever created on Solana that will support any of the DEXs created on Solana, such as Jupiter, Raydium, Orca, Pumpfun and more.
π Fantastic profitability of the bot fluctuates between 7-12% daily and has amazing potential to scale higher wβ¦
π€ Top 7 Public / Free Bots Results From Last Month!
With the latest update to our Free / Public version, we've seen a remarkable 3.56% improvement in performance. Feedback from our Public users has highlighted some outstanding results. Here are the top 7 earners:
1st place - $17,568 profit, costs - $4,530
2nd place - $17,116 profit, costs - $6,343
3rd place - $16,082 profit, costs - $7,959
4th place - $15,638 profβ¦
π107β€82π₯61π28π€26π22π¦20β‘9
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @uniswapmev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channelβs posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@uniswapmev named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
@ferramemefi named in 7 posts, 8 August 2026 β 6 November 2026
@ramseydefi named in 7 posts, 8 August 2026 β 6 November 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 β this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπ€ Mev Bot v7.15β (@uniswapmev), 13,186 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uniswapmev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.