Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 42 days, net -54. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,066–1,136 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 19:56
1,074
-4
14 Sept 2026, 11:40
1,078
-5
11 Sept 2026, 02:38
1,083
-4
6 Sept 2026, 11:17
1,087
-8
29 Aug 2026, 20:16
1,095
-2
27 Aug 2026, 06:09
1,097
-1
24 Aug 2026, 14:46
1,098
-7
21 Aug 2026, 05:33
1,105
-4
18 Aug 2026, 06:03
1,109
-7
15 Aug 2026, 00:19
1,116
-8
11 Aug 2026, 10:26
1,124
-4
7 Aug 2026, 23:48
1,128
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:34
1,128
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 3 September 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
1,138 reactions across 17 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
576
50.6%
❤
261
22.9%
🔥
88
7.73%
🤔
39
3.43%
👏
34
2.99%
💯
33
2.90%
🎉
24
2.11%
👎
15
1.32%
🥰
15
1.32%
🗿
11
0.967%
🙏
11
0.967%
👻
9
0.791%
💅
8
0.703%
😁
7
0.615%
🆒
4
0.351%
✍
1
0.088%
😎
1
0.088%
🫡
1
0.088%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,138 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 September 2023 to 12 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 17 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @united_finance. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 September 2023 to 12 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
We’re still refining the protocol: running tests, fixing bugs, and improving stability.
In the meantime - to help you better understand the mechanics - here are some example transactions:
Mint: https://testnet.tonviewer.com/transaction/1cf5b92966a5992a17636b73fd7bf633ac38673501bcaf57e1e9366b8b9c4afe
Redeem:
https://testnet.tonviewer.com/transaction/2e4f7d3e7d2ce7218659444ce347fc3c97d07f1e1ac15d345b62846d5b57c503
We've entered the internal testnet phase.
At this stage, we are testing the smart contracts deployed to the testnet: integration tests, stress testing, fuzz testing, and more.
After several testing iterations and addressing any potential bugs and security issues, we will be ready to launch the public testnet phase.
All our efforts are currently focused on the smart contracts layer. We continue development, and while we've resolved many of the previous challenges, some of them are still left to fix.
So we haven’t managed to reach the testnet phase in Q4 2024, and it gets delayed to Q1 2025
Happy New Year!
In addition to the previous message: of course, the protocol cannot be considered fully decentralized until a DAO with governance tokens granting voting rights is implemented.
As soon as we implement the first protocol products, wuTON and wuUSD, we plan to proceed with the implementation of governance and the issuance of governance tokens
One of the key features of the United Finance protocol is that it is decentralized.
This means that all the logic of the protocol is entirely contained within smart contracts. These contracts are self-executing programs, written directly into the blockchain.
This provides the following advantages:
🛡 No single point of failure: There is no single server that can fail or be hacked.
📖 Transparency and verifiability: …
Protocol Development Update:
We must adjust our initial plan to launch wuTON token in the summer of 2024. Due to the unique architecture of the TON blockchain and the lack of comparable solutions in the market, development has taken longer than anticipated
Considering all these factors, we now anticipate completing the development of the first product and launching it on the testnet in Q4 2024.
We're glad to see that our proposal for implementing the Rebase-Token standard, which we discussed in our previous post, has attracted the community's attention.
The folks at Tonresearch have conducted a deep analysis of our proposal and have made suggestions for its improvement: https://tonresear.ch/t/current-implementation-methods-and-ideas-for-rebase-tokens-on-ton/29338
The TON blockchain is currently one of the most advanced blockchains. One of its key features is the infinite sharding paradigm, a solution that makes the TON blockchain infinitely scalable. Thanks to this solution, the TON blockchain can automatically divide into sub-blockchains (shardchains), the number of which increases and decreases depending on the network load.
However, due to this feature, new requirements a…
Currently, we are developing the wuTON token. wuTON is a yield-bearing token backed by TON. It is a non-rebase token that appreciates in value over time. Yield is generated through various strategies, including ston.fi pools, liquid staking tokens, etc.
So, what does the ‘w’ stand for in the wuTON token name? It stands for ‘wrapped’. But what is it wrapped around? Initially, we planned to implement the uTON token—a …
Why did we choose the TON blockchain for our project?
There are a few reasons, but the main one is its scalability. Unlike other blockchains, TON can potentially handle millions of transactions per second without sacrificing decentralization or security. This is achieved through its unique sharding architecture - the blockchain gets split into numerous parallel shard chains when it is under load.
Here's what that a…
👍20❤9🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @united_finance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ENCUENTRA EMPLEO ORELLANA @EncuentraEmpleoOrellana · 26,265 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 27 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“United Finance” (@united_finance), 1,074 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/united_finance.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.