123
❤1🔥1

Channel
@unityairdrop_ir
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,810subscribers
-39 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002136451625 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @unityairdrop_ir |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/unityairdrop_ir |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:44 | 1,810 | -7 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:13 | 1,817 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 1,820 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 1,824 | -6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:12 | 1,830 | -6 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 1,836 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:38 | 1,837 | -8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:41 | 1,845 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 1,848 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:32 | 1,849 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 1,849 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 3 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
22 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 15 | 68.2% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 13.6% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 4.55% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 4.55% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 4.55% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 4.55% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 November 2024 to 13 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @unityairdrop_ir. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 November 2024 to 13 September 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
123
❤1🔥1
بنظرم میتونیم با یه قیمتی بین 1.8تا2.3دلار در صورت لیست شدن در بایننس رو به رو باشیم که همرو راضی میکنه!
😁1
توکنومیک نات پیکسل رسماً منتشر شد. کل عرضه توکن : 250,000,000 $PX جامعه : 200,000,000 $PX (80%) ۷۰٪ برای شما، فعال ترین بازیکنان، برندگان و فقط افراد بزرگ و ۱۰٪ به عنوان مشوق برای دارندگان اصلی نات کوین همانطور که باید باشد، جامعهی فعال بیشترین سهم را دارد. تیم : 20,000,000 $PX (8%) بازاریابی : 17,50,000 $PX (7%) نقدینگی : 12,500,000 $PX (5%)
👍2
ما 3 صفر از موجودی همه کاربران و کل عرضه را حذف کردیم. اکنون پرداختن به قیمت گذاری توکن بسیار ساده تر خواهد بود. مثالها (قبل از → بعد): 10,000,000 → 10,000 دلار پیکس 100000 → 100 دلار پیکس با تغییرات، برای دریافت airdrop باید بیش از 100 دلار پیکس در موجودی خود داشته باشید. @UnityAirdrop_iR
👍4
هر روز پنج فرصت ۴ ثانیهای برای ماین دارید از دستش ندید که یه بمب تو راهه! @Notcoin ورود به ناتکوین
👍2
خبر خوش دوستان ناتکوین دوباره کلیکرش برگشته بزنید عشق کنید!!! @Notcoin
طرح پرسش در رابطه با وضعیت بن شده ها در نات پیکسل و پاسخ یکی از افراد مهم نزدیک به تیم پرسش ۱: سلام. پرسش بسیار مهمی که مدت هاست ذهن کاربران را به خود مشغول کرده است: آیا روند مسدودیت اکانت های غیرقانونی به پایان رسیده است یا قرار است این موضوع دوباره بررسی شود؟ بسیاری نگران هستند و معتقدند که شایستهی این موضوع نبودند. پاسخ: سلام. روند ممنوعیت ها هنوز به پایان نرسیده و تعدادی از ربات ها وجود دارند که بن خواهند شد.…
👍1
فعالسازی دوباره کپچا در نات پیکسل ناتپیکسل مجدداً کپچا (TON Captcha) را برای تأیید هویت کاربران فعال کرده است. انجام دادن این تسک برای ایردراپ ضروری و ساده است و تنها نیاز به یک تراکنش دارد. انجام چندین تراکنش نیاز نیست. توجه داشته باشید که برای تکمیل تسک باید کیف پول خود را به درستی متصل کنید و رمز تراکنش را به دقت وارد کنید. @UnityAirdrop_iR
پست جالب نات پیکسل از کامنتی که وجود خارجی ندارد! کپشن پست منتشر شده توسط کانال رسمی نات پیکسل در تلگرام: چند جهانی (مالتی ورس) مفهومی است که به طرز وحشتناکی اطلاعات کمی دربارهی آن داریم. اصلا نات پیکسل چی میگه؟ حوصله نداری نخون، بچه های ریاضی فیزیک بخونید و فردا دبیراتونو به چالش بکشید. اگرم دوست داشتید، دانسته های خودتون رو در این رابطه کامنت کنید. 😁 همیشه در گذشته چه به عنوان یک دانش آموز و چه یک آموزگار، این ف…
👍1
ماینینگ ربات نات پیکسل تا چند ساعت دیگه تموم میشه💎
🪙 🔻 فروشگاه ناتپیکسل تخفیف آیتمهای مختلف رو از ۵۰ به ۷۵ درصد افزایش داد. @UnityAirdrop_iR
◽️ نات پیکسل در حال مسدودیت متقلبان! ⚫️ صفحه ورودی نات پیکسلتون اگه به این شکله متاسفانه بن شدید! دلیل؟ استفاده از اسکریپت، ربات ها، مولتی اکانت و... 🤨 @UnityAirdrop_iR
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @unityairdrop_ir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@unityairdrop_ir named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Unity AirDroP | اخبار ناتکوین” (@unityairdrop_ir), 1,810 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/unityairdrop_ir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.