Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for UPSC Current Only UCO

Channel

UPSC Current Only UCO

@upsccurrentonlyofficial

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

934subscribers

+895 since we began measuring on 7 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003736454432
TypeChannel
Username@upsccurrentonlyofficial
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 September 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/upsccurrentonlyofficial

Growth

39934486.57 September 2026 — 39 subscribers10 September 2026 — 226 subscribers10 September 2026 — 226 subscribers18 September 2026 — 934 subscribers7 September 202618 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 10 days, net +895. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 06:18934+708
10 Sept 2026, 10:22226no change
10 Sept 2026, 09:58226+187
7 Sept 2026, 20:4739first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.2%
avg views ÷ 934 subscribers
Avg views / post
142
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 September 2026
Posts held20 (28 August 202610 September 2026)
Views total2,840
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Sept 2026, 10:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 August 2026 to 10 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Sept 2026, 04:18 UTC54 viewsread 10 September 2026

There's two ways to seriously revolutionise your shitty life: -Hate something so much you're motivated by eternal rage to "prove em wrong!" -Have something you love so much you'll do whatever it takes to protect it The path you choose is up to you, each is effective.

9 Sept 2026, 19:51 UTC69 viewsread 10 September 2026

Learn all these reports and important aspects of current affairs in CA Batch for UPSC Prelims 2027. Develop your higher order thinking skills so that Prelims looks as cakewalk not challenge. For info @upsccurrentonlycontact

9 Sept 2026, 19:35 UTC62 views1 reactionsread 10 September 2026

Expected questions for Prelims 2027 Part 2 1- Navier Stokes theorem 2- Leaf eared Mouse 3- Marine species moving toward colder waters 4- Interstellar comet 5- EU China trade deficit 6- Pak, Saudi, Thekey alliance 7- Kenya Madagascar REE 8- Cryptic species 9- Energy chokepoints of world. Learn from experts in Current Affairs batch.

👍1

9 Sept 2026, 19:17 UTC58 viewsread 10 September 2026
File

Very very imp for Prelims, Mains, Interview. We will cover such reports in Current Affairs Batch.

9 Sept 2026, 19:16 UTC54 viewsread 10 September 2026

Expected questions Prelims 2027 1- OpenAI, Hugging Face Emoji, AI agent and its AI debacle report. (Expect case study and direct question) 🤖 2- Organgutan 🦧 Mains 2027 expected GDP growth rate issues and surrounding concerns. Learn from those who always deliver guaranteed questions + Enable highest ever selection rate in UPSC Prelims.

8 Sept 2026, 12:32 UTC114 viewsread 10 September 2026
Photo

Current Affairs are 60% of your UPSC Prelims, learn from those who proved their mettle each year. Current Affairs Batch for UPSC Prelims 2027 Batch Details. Proofs of 2024 Proofs of 2025 Proofs of 2026 Demo lecture 1 Demo lecture 2 For info contact @upsccurrentonlycontact

7 Sept 2026, 06:40 UTC302 viewsread 10 September 2026

This week in classes we will focus on Space missions and make you understand reasons behind major missions, techs, why and what they changed. 1. Sputnik 1 → “Can we reach space?” ↓ 2. Luna 3 → “What is on the other side of the Moon?” ↓ 3. Vostok 1 → “Can humans live in space?” ↓ 4. Apollo 11 → “Can humans reach another world?” ↓ 5. Voyager → “How does our planetary system actually work?” ↓ 6. Hubble → “How big, old

7 Sept 2026, 04:22 UTC250 viewsread 10 September 2026

One of the clearest signs of HIGH INTELLIGENCE is having no desire to be seen, admired, or understood by people, at peace with being misunderstood, and incredibly skilled at the art of letting go.

6 Sept 2026, 15:40 UTC227 viewsread 10 September 2026

It doesn't matter in which section you fall viz 1- Political manipulation 2- Emotional intelligence management 3- Family management 4- Relationships management 5- Career aspirations I experienced it and telling you backed on Harvard and Stanford research that Social Media is manipulating you to become what exactly you are not + Snatching your thinking power and consciousness.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @upsccurrentonlyofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“UPSC Current Only UCO” (@upsccurrentonlyofficial), 934 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/upsccurrentonlyofficial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.