wrt CSE Pre '27 Become obsessed with Current Affairs starting from now And most importantly Daily solve minimum 20qns

Channel
Upsc Infocademy
@upscinfocademy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,418subscribers
-38 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001563790826 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @upscinfocademy |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/upscinfocademy |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 14:01 | 9,418 | +1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 08:21 | 9,417 | -8 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 02:38 | 9,425 | -7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:23 | 9,432 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 9,437 | -11 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:53 | 9,448 | -10 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 9,458 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 04:43 | 9,459 | -8 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:58 | 9,467 | +15 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:23 | 9,452 | +10 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:13 | 9,442 | -14 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:30 | 9,456 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:25 | 9,456 | first reading |
Engagement
192 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.992%
- avg views ÷ 9,418 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 93.4
- 123 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.13%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 124
- of 192 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 123 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 192 (5 August 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 11,492 |
| Reactions total | 12 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 06:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 5s
- Average length
- 5s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
66 reactions across 33 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 60 | 90.9% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 4.55% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 3.03% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.52% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 192 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 192 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
If you've acquired technical knowledge/done mba, and refusing to appear in IBPS SO, the loss is YOURS
IBPS SO exam! We didn't just clear cut-off Instead we decimated into the Qualifying Zone!
🔥 LIKEWISE — all 5 together. This batch is world-geo heavy, which is exactly where the ROI is now. 1. ARAL SEA → ARALKUM DESERT 💎 Core map Aral Sea → between Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan Main feeder rivers: Amu Darya Syr Darya 🔥 It is an endorheic basin → no natural outlet to the ocean. 💎 Aralkum Desert Formed largely on the exposed former seabed after massive river diversion for irrigation. 🔥 Killer: Aralkum = …
Salal → Chenab → Indus basin
🔥 LIKEWISE — all 5 together. Strict Tier-1, no random expansion. 1. NFHS-6 → HEALTH + GOVERNANCE BRIDGE 💎 Who coordinates? NFHS → Ministry of Health & Family Welfare Technical/field anchor → IIPS, Mumbai Covers: fertility maternal & child health nutrition anaemia family planning household characteristics 🔥 Trap: NFHS ≠ Census NFHS is a sample survey; Census is universal enumeration. 💎 Indicator bridge …
⚡ 20-second lock Sahibi → Rajasthan–Haryana–Delhi → Najafgarh → Yamuna Conocarpus → hardy urban tree, concerns yes, formal invasive status no Tonle Sap → Cambodia → monsoon flow reversal Juan de Fuca → subducts below North America → Cascades Gwalior → telecom/electronics manufacturing cluster
🔥 LIKEWISE — all 5 together. This batch is great for elimination training. 1. SAHIBI RIVER / NAJAFGARH DRAIN 💎 Core map Sahibi → originates in Rajasthan Flows through: Rajasthan → Haryana → Delhi In Delhi, it is strongly associated with the Najafgarh drain system before joining the Yamuna. 🔥 Killer: Najafgarh Drain is not an isolated sewer channel historically; it sits within an older natural drainage system. …
Q9. Falkland Islands are located in the: A. North Atlantic B. South Atlantic C. Indian Ocean D. South China Sea Answer: B Q10. Falkland Sound separates: A. Argentina and Chile B. East and West Falkland C. Falklands and South Georgia D. Tierra del Fuego and Antarctica Answer: B ⚡ 20-second lock Red Panda → Sikkim + bamboo + Eastern Himalaya Arctic Council → 1996 + 8 states + India Observer Himadri → Svalbard …
🔥 LIKEWISE — all 5 together. Strict Tier-1 bridge-building, no fluff. 1. RED PANDA → EASTERN HIMALAYA SPECIES WALL 💎 Core ID Red Panda → arboreal mammal Diet → mainly bamboo State Animal → Sikkim Habitat → temperate forests of the Eastern Himalaya. 🔥 Trap: Red Panda ≠ Giant Panda taxonomically. 💎 Distribution bridge Think: Sikkim Arunachal Pradesh North Bengal / Darjeeling-Singalila landscape 🔥 UPSC loves spe…
Victoria → White Nile | Tana → Blue Nile | Tanganyika → Congo | Chad → endorheic Kamchatka → Sea of Okhotsk + Pacific → Ring of Fire
🔥 LIKEWISE — all 5 together. Strict Tier-1 CSE bridge-building. 1. SOFI REPORT → HUNGER / NUTRITION 💎 SOFI = State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World Focus: hunger food insecurity malnutrition nutrition-related SDG progress 🔥 UPSC trap: Do not confuse it with Global Hunger Index, which is a separate publication. 💎 Nutrition indicators to separate Undernourishment → insufficient dietary energy Stu…
Showing the 12 most recent of 192 posts we hold for @upscinfocademy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- A. 1 and 2 only20%
- B. 2 and 3 only18%
- C. 1 and 3 only15%
- D. 1, 2 and 3 only48%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- A. 1 only3%
- B. 1&2 only16%
- C 1&3 only55%
- D 1,2&326%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
- A. 1 and 2 only9%
- B. 1, 3 and 4 only47%
- C. 2, 3 and 4 only16%
- D. 1, 2, 3 and 428%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
i honour an Indian scientist, yet I am conferred by an international organisation devoted to space research rather than by the Government of India.
- A. Aryabhata Award14%
- B. COSPAR Vikram Sarabhai Medal69%
- C. Shanti Swarup Bhatnagar Prize17%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
My habitat is dense and elevated. I am an agile climber, but unlike my larger spotted relatives, I spend much of my life among branches rather than on open ground.
- A. Leopard Cat35%
- B. Clouded Leopard47%
- C. Caracal18%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
I reduce reaction time without relying on satellites or roadside infrastructure. My greatest strength lies in sharing danger with those who have not yet seen it.
- A. Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) communication44%
- B. Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2I) communication22%
- C. Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR)34%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 192 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@study4u48 · 137,135
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 13 August 2026
@sarkarijobnews · 39,588
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 30 August 2026
@EPFO_VyasaIAS · 22,367
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 20 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Upsc Infocademy” (@upscinfocademy), 9,418 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/upscinfocademy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.