最新版核心已修复部分人驱动刷入失败 以及自瞄方向错误问题
👍31👎7❤2

Channel
@usakernel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
19,782subscribers
+521 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1003920476991 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @usakernel |
| Description | 美国公益更新频道 置顶最新版 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 15 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 21 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/usakernel |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 19,782 | -8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:57 | 19,790 | -25 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:43 | 19,815 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:29 | 19,818 | -6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 19,824 | +12 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:26 | 19,812 | -11 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 17:55 | 19,823 | +29 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:46 | 19,794 | +15 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:22 | 19,779 | +8 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 12:55 | 19,771 | -10 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:08 | 19,781 | +41 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 19,740 | +54 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:38 | 19,686 | +44 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 19,642 | +27 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 19,615 | +111 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:32 | 19,504 | +51 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:01 | 19,453 | +27 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 19,426 | +122 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 19,304 | +43 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 19,261 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (15 July 2026 – 20 August 2026) |
| Views total | 94,510 |
| Reactions total | 914 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Aug 2026, 11:08 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,646 reactions across 22 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 962 | 36.4% | |
| ❤ | 559 | 21.1% | |
| 😭 | 475 | 18.0% | |
| 👎 | 232 | 8.77% | |
| 🖕 | 175 | 6.61% | |
| 🫡 | 55 | 2.08% | |
| 🤣 | 40 | 1.51% | |
| 🤬 | 30 | 1.13% | |
| 💩 | 27 | 1.02% | |
| 😍 | 16 | 0.605% | |
| 😁 | 15 | 0.567% | |
| 😡 | 14 | 0.529% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 0.491% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 0.265% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 0.227% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 0.189% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 0.189% | |
| 🍌 | 4 | 0.151% | |
| 🐳 | 3 | 0.113% | |
| 🤪 | 3 | 0.113% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,646reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
最新版核心已修复部分人驱动刷入失败 以及自瞄方向错误问题
👍31👎7❤2
所有游戏对接USA无痕驱动 修复部分用户自动加载驱动失败 瓦新增本地模型 第一次使用需要菜单内点击下载模型 基本不会出现误判 空气掩体情况 优化扩散预测 新增一帧拉枪功能 有任何bug请在下方留言 看到后我会修复
👍51👎14❤7💩7😁3🔥2🖕2
bug睡醒修 内置驱动放心用和外面那些驱动稳定性一样 他们有的我都有 应该不会再考虑对接第三方驱动了 自己的驱动方便维护和扩展功能还不用每次都更新别人的对接
👍59❤18👎18😁1
更新瓦 支持新英雄 支持伪无扩散 不再支持第三方驱动 仅自带驱动 自动刷入
👍95❤14🍌4😁4🥰3👎2🖕2
休息一段时间
😭436🫡55👎18🖕17😡14❤8😢6😱5
更新有点多可能没测试到位 有bug麻烦点反馈建议联系双向机器人描述清楚是哪个游戏 群里发看不见 我会第一时间修复
👍49👎20💩12❤11👏1
⭐ USA公益内核启动器 🎮 手瓦 - 更新完美全图解密 🎮 三角洲 - 修复盒子显示bug 🎮 和平 - 修复坐标解密 🎮 CFM - 修复数组解密 新增掩体漏打 🎮 暗区 - 新增算法解密 新增掩体漏打 🎮 王者 - 新增算法解密 优化自瞄算法 ⭐ 新增失控进化游戏支持 功能:绘制/自瞄/全物资/动物/追踪 ❤️ 最新版本点我 ❤️ 反馈建议点我 ❤️ 公益频道:https://t.me/nutqvq ❤️ 更新频道:https://t.me/usakernel
👍121❤56👎21🤬19😁3
更新王者/暗区公益算法解密支持吗
👍287👎17❤5👏4🖕2
玩三角洲的可以支持一下 刚更新的模拟算法解密 最近在更新公益雷达和内核 到时候会一起发布
👍25👎12❤6
⭐ 三角洲赞助版 模拟算法解密 模拟执行算法解密 无视游戏加密 新增局内小地图/大地图雷达 优化自瞄 智能识别枪械配件 枪枪到肉 绘制/自瞄/掩体漏打/物资/容器/雷达 支持全系统 虚拟机 无法使用包退 全体用户已集体加时7天 旧版本用户请到网盘下载最新版本 ❤️ 24小时自助免手续费提卡点我
🖕31❤22👍3
Sticker, posted without a caption
👍31😍16🤬11❤5
美国公益更新频道 pinned a file
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @usakernel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 270,488 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“美国公益更新频道” (@usakernel), 19,782 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/usakernel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.