У каждого свой опыт с USN. Собрали несколько отзывов — листайте и делитесь собственными впечатлениями в комментариях 💪
❤6👍1

Channel
@usnrussia
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
22,093subscribers
-39 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001792085932 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @usnrussia |
| Created | Between 1 January 2022 and 31 March 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 61 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/usnrussia |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 05:29 | 22,093 | -42 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 07:59 | 22,135 | -37 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 10:59 | 22,172 | -66 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 08:36 | 22,238 | -102 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 05:11 | 22,340 | -67 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 07:46 | 22,407 | -63 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 06:08 | 22,470 | -53 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 08:36 | 22,523 | -60 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 07:37 | 22,583 | -91 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 05:51 | 22,674 | -66 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 06:36 | 22,740 | -107 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 06:07 | 22,847 | -41 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 05:16 | 22,888 | +45 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 02:37 | 22,843 | +38 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 02:56 | 22,805 | +48 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 04:07 | 22,757 | +28 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 06:27 | 22,729 | +52 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 21:45 | 22,677 | -29 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 17:08 | 22,706 | -57 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 15:04 | 22,763 | first reading |
100 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 85 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 100 (31 July 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 21,896 |
| Reactions total | 352 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 02:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 31 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,400 reactions across 95 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 697 | 49.8% | |
| 👍 | 311 | 22.2% | |
| 🔥 | 218 | 15.6% | |
| 😁 | 72 | 5.14% | |
| 👏 | 34 | 2.43% | |
| 😢 | 29 | 2.07% | |
| 🎉 | 15 | 1.07% | |
| 👎 | 9 | 0.643% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 0.5% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 0.214% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 0.214% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.071% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.071% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 95 of the 100 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,400 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 100 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 28 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
У каждого свой опыт с USN. Собрали несколько отзывов — листайте и делитесь собственными впечатлениями в комментариях 💪
❤6👍1
⚠️ По техническим причинам сайт usn-shop.ru временно недоступен ⚠️ А пока напоминаем, что продукция USN также представлена на всем известных маркетплейсах: Ozon WB Следите за обновлениями — скоро вернёмся! 💪
😢12
Posted without readable text
❤4👍4
Photo, posted without a caption
👍1
Нет настроения тренироваться? Устали после работы? Хочется просто остаться дома и листать рилсы? 😢 Вот только вашим мышцам (и здоровью) всё равно, каким сегодня был день и насколько сильно вам неохота заниматься. Результат складывается из тех тренировок, на которые вы пришли. Даже когда мотивация была на нуле 🤷♂️ План + дисциплина = результат USN поддержит ваш прогресс на каждом этапе: от первой тренировки до нов…
❤9🔥2👎1
Ну что, атлеты, зимний массонабор-то уже начали? 😏 Подготовили для вас подборку продуктов USN, которые в этом процессе помогут 💪
❤10👍2
Posted without readable text
❤7👏4👎3
Вот почему у тебя не прёт масса ✍️ Набор мышечной массы требует системного подхода, но о некоторых деталях часто забывают. На карточках собрали 7 шагов, которые помогут выстроить этот процесс грамотно. В линейке USN есть всё необходимое для качественного массонабора. А у вас есть какие-то лайфхаки для роста? Делитесь в комментариях 👇
❤5👍4
Сложно… Всё такое вкусное 😋 Напоминаем, что эти и другие продукты USN доступны в официальном магазине 🛒
❤10
Креатин наращивает мышцы без тренировок? 🤯 Креатин давно используют для поддержки силовых показателей и набора мышечной массы. Но новое исследование показало интересный результат: у людей 45–65 лет эффект наблюдался даже без структурированных тренировок. В 12-недельном исследовании участники, которые не тренировались и принимали 10 г креатина моногидрата в день, в среднем набрали около 1,1 кг безжировой массы и пок…
👏10❤6
Выбирайте живущих в наши дни или покинувших нас атлетов и в чём бы вы хотели с ними зарубиться 👇
❤6
Ваши впечатления помогают другим выбирать продукты для своих целей ❤️ Собрали отзывы на карточках — смотрите и рассказывайте, что уже успели попробовать 👇
❤11👍9🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 100 posts we hold for @usnrussia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Может ли креатин увеличивать мышечную массу без тренировок?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Стараетесь максимально уменьшить цифры на весах?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Что сильнее влияет на снижение уровня тестостерона?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какой компонент предтренировочных комплексов вызывает покалывание?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какой запах повышает выносливость, согласно недавнему исследованию?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 100 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“USN Russia” (@usnrussia), 22,093 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/usnrussia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.