Channel
@usual_thing
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,137subscribers
-45 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002142372308 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @usual_thing |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 21 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/usual_thing |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 18:59 | 3,137 | -4 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 11:36 | 3,141 | -6 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:57 | 3,147 | -8 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 18:57 | 3,155 | -5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:12 | 3,160 | -8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 3,168 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 3,173 | -5 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 3,178 | -4 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:00 | 3,182 | no change |
| 21 Aug 2026, 14:45 | 3,182 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
429 reactions across 20 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 241 | 56.2% | |
| ❤ | 133 | 31.0% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 3.50% | |
| 🫡 | 10 | 2.33% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 1.40% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 1.40% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 0.932% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 0.932% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 0.466% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 0.466% | |
| 🤷♂ | 2 | 0.466% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.233% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.233% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.233% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 0.233% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 429 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 February 2025 to 14 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Learning SEO (and it's not going great — yet) Still figuring out how SEO works. No shortcuts, just reading, testing, and watching the numbers. Here's where things stand after about 3 weeks: 36 total impressions, 0 clicks, average position 55.3. The graph looks like a tiny mountain range — some days 9 impressions, most days zero. Honestly? Expected worse. The site is getting seen by Google, just buried on page 5-6. No…
❤6👍6💯1
Hi everyone! I’m shocked and amazed that there are still people in this channel. Thank you for staying here. I’ve been thinking more and more about starting to post here again. After all, I’ve managed to launch an app, and there’s a lot happening around it. I’ve also created the first version of a game, though it’s still a few months away from release. If you’re interested, feel free to like this post, and I promise …
❤22👍13
Hello everyone! I feel terribly guilty for disappearing from this channel. The truth is, a new project pulled me in 100%, and now I’m finally ready to show it to the world. It’s an app that helps you navigate relationships — packed with AI-coach trainings and much more. If you’re curious, feel free to download and try it absolutely for free. https://apps.apple.com/app/soulcue-ai/id6754840010
❤2🥰2
Hi everyone! Like I promised earlier, I’ve stated working with my own game. It’s not just my hands, i had to creat the small team for that, but the process is started. If you think it can be interesting for you, please follow. https://t.me/invasion_protocol As soon as possible i’ll share with you some problems in the project, how my developer didn’t read my message etc. ❤️
❤9🥰2
How I Validated a $100K Business Idea in 7 Days From Idea to Profit: The 7-Day Test That Saves Years of Failure Most startups fail because they build something nobody wants. Here’s how to avoid that: Step 1: The 1-Hour Google Test Search keywords: "[Your niche] + problems" (e.g., "remote teams problems"). Reddit, Quora, and forums show real pain points; Step 2: Create a Fake Landing Page Use Carrd.co to build a s…
❤16🔥7
"5 Business Mistakes That Cost Me 6 Months (And How to Avoid Them)" "Why 90% of Startups Fail Before Year 1: Lessons from My First Launch" When I started my first business, I thought passion and a good idea were enough. Spoiler: They weren’t. Here are the 5 mistakes that almost killed my project: "We’ll figure out legal stuff later" Result: Lost $15K in a contract dispute. Fix: Hire a lawyer even for a 1-hour cons…
👍16❤3👏2😁2
The Harsh truth about building a Game dev team One of the hardest parts of indie game development isn’t the code or design — it’s building a team. With a limited budget: You can’t offer stability, only passion — and passion fades. Talented people often prioritize paid work, leaving your project behind. You may compromise on quality just to get things done. Time zones and skill mismatches slow everything down. You co…
❤8👍4🔥3🤷♂2👌1🫡1
Hey everyone! I'm really sorry for disappearing for two whole months, but now I'm back! I changed jobs and have fully dived back into my own projects — working on a strategy game. Posts about business development and investments will continue. Thank you all for sticking around! ❤️
❤33🫡9👍8❤🔥2🥰2🤔1
Easy app plus AI I'm sure you face with a lot of different apps in your mobile store. Some of businessmen found an interesting segment. They create an easy app with AI. For example AI for tracking your calories, for checking plans or summarizer your meeting/video etc. These apps are designed to make your life easier, saving you time and helping you stay organized. These AI-powered apps are easy to create, scalable, …
👍14❤4😱2
Interviews your customers One of the most popular way is an interview. You can start call with your customer and ask them about your product, it can help you to find a new feature, which will be very useful. Although you can't call without plan and ask customers: "What do you like or not?". Ask Open-Ended Questions – Get real insights by encouraging detailed answers. Try to avoid leading questions. Let customers exp…
👍10❤3🔥1😁1
Check your plan Do you know that the third month is coming to an end? Are you ready to check out your plan that you made at the beginning of the year? I'm using google sheets for it. You can create personalized tracking systems, whether it's for your health, finances, career, or personal goals. Google Sheets offers flexibility that allows you to design exactly what you need. Share your progress with friends, colleag…
👍19❤6
Pet projects Ever heard of a pet project? It’s something a lot of developers (and creators in general) dive into in their free time – a project they work on just for the fun of it, outside of their main job. I have never heard about previously I was sure, that It's trying to find an additional income. You can experiment with ideas that you might not get to in your day job. Did you know some of the most popular servi…
👍25🤔3❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @usual_thing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Usual thing” (@usual_thing), 3,137 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/usual_thing.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.