Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Management situation

Channel

Management situation

@utsituation

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,153subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001470798212
TypeChannel
Username@utsituation
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded23 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/utsituation

Growth

1,1461,1531,149.523 August 2026 — 1,146 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,146 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,148 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,151 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,153 subscribers23 August 20263 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 11 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,145–1,154 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 08:351,153+2
30 Aug 2026, 16:581,151+3
27 Aug 2026, 18:141,148+2
25 Aug 2026, 01:461,146no change
23 Aug 2026, 17:151,146first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
59.3%
avg views ÷ 1,153 subscribers
Avg views / post
684
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026
Posts held20 (12 August 202623 August 2026)
Views total13,674
Reactions total296
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

296 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍12742.9%
5719.3%
😁4214.2%
🍌3511.8%
👎3511.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 296 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Aug 2026, 11:19 UTC296 views29 reactionsread 23 August 2026

‌ استاد واقع بینی باشی بهتر از اینه که مث خری که بهش تیتاپ دادن بیای دانشگاه تهران با این ذهنیت که قراره صرف حضور توی این مکانی که روز به روز اساتید تخمی تر و حکومتی تر بیشتر میشن توش باعث میشه آیندت تضمین باشه. دانشگاه تهران در بهترین حالت میتونه دوستای خوبی بهت بده با یکی دوتا جمله موندگار از چند تا استاد درست و حسابی که قراره همیشه یادت بمونه. توی کار قرار نیست کمک چندانی بهت بکنه و تخم کسیم نیست کجا درس خوندی. بر

👍252👎2

21 Aug 2026, 11:49 UTC522 views60 reactionsread 23 August 2026

‌ یه سریا استاد کشتن ذوق آدمان: دانشگاه برات نریدن، ارشد خوندن حماقته، علوم انسانی آینده نداره، دکتری تو ایران خریته، درس خوندن هیچ نتیجه‌ای نداره، مهندسی تهش اسنپه... ول کن دیگه پفیوز، ریدم تو خودت و توصیه‌های تخمی‌ت. اگه راه بهتری بلدی همین الان دهنتو ببند و برو انجامش بده لوزر جاکش. @TweetyChannel | ImKhazaan

49👍6😁4👎1

21 Aug 2026, 11:49 UTC446 views2 reactionsread 23 August 2026

‌ https://t.me/utsituation/28846 احتمالا سهمیه های ۲۵ به حد نصاب نرسیده نمره ای که باید میاوردن و تو رو جاش گرفتن

2

21 Aug 2026, 11:49 UTC500 views2 reactionsread 23 August 2026

‌ ادمین اینو لطفا بذار کانال خیلی مهمه🙏🏼 من عکس شماره سریال و پرونده و هر چی مربوط به مشخصات کنکور ارشد بودو توی گالریم داشتم ولی چند وقت پیش همه چی پاک شد و هیچی ازش ندارم هیچی هیچی نتیجه ارشد بیاد من باید چیکار کنم؟ اصلا راهی هست؟

👍2

21 Aug 2026, 11:48 UTC497 viewsread 23 August 2026

‌ https://t.me/utsituation/28846 توی این مسائل بیشتر پرسش و راهنمایی از آموزش های مربوطه میتونن کمک کننده باشن توی دانشجوها کم پیش میاد بدونن

20 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC549 views6 reactionsread 23 August 2026

‌ سلام دوستان من دیروز نتایج که اومد زده بود قبول شدم، امروز که کارنامه اومده زده سهمیه نهایی ازاد، اما سهمیه قبولی رو زده ایثارگر ۲۵ درصد!! در صورتی که من اصلا سهمیه نداشتم و اعلامم کردم الان مشکل از دانشکده‌است؟ یا سنجش؟ ایا اینجوری پذیرش من باطل میشه؟ کسی مورد مشابهی داشته؟ پی نوشت: مربوط به دانشکده دیگری هستم

🍌3😁21

17 Aug 2026, 08:35 UTC922 views21 reactionsread 23 August 2026

‌ https://t.me/utsituation/28834 چجوری یکی از مهمترین تصمیم های زندگیت رو با پرسیدن از چندنفر که نمیشناسیشون تو یه چنل پیام ناشناس یه دانشگاه دیگه میگیری؟

👍21

17 Aug 2026, 08:34 UTC846 views11 reactionsread 23 August 2026

‌ https://t.me/utsituation/28839 اگه اعتراض داری یه بار دوبار میگی اونم نه تو ناشناس، فایده نکرد کاندید می شی واسه سال بعد با چند نفر که مثل شما بسیار دغدغه‌مند هستن اعتلاف میدین. این که این جا در مورد ایرادات صنفی بحث کنیم فایده نداره.

🍌6👍4👎1

16 Aug 2026, 16:06 UTC846 views19 reactionsread 23 August 2026

‌ https://t.me/c/1406550321/66420 انجمن علمی دولتی این بار واقعا یه کار خوب کرد، دمشون گرم ولی جالبه که باز بعضیا به رسم همیشگیشون لوگوی خودشون رو چسبوندن کنارش که کار به اسم خودشون تموم بشه! فقط کافیه به بالای تصویر دقت کنین (میگم رسم همیشگی چون قبلا هم دقیقا سر همایش انجمن علمی حسابداری همین کار رو کرده بودن) واقعا عجیبه به مجموعه‌ که خودش عرضه برگزاری یه برنامه مستقل رو نداره‌ این‌ قدر اصرار داره اسمش رو به کار

😁9👍5👎5

16 Aug 2026, 16:06 UTC609 views21 reactionsread 23 August 2026

‌ https://t.me/utsituation/28834 نیا دانشگاه تهران نریدن برات

👎13👍8

16 Aug 2026, 16:06 UTC570 views14 reactionsread 23 August 2026

‌ https://t.me/utsituation/28834 فرار کن

😁6👎5🍌2👍1

16 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC593 viewsread 23 August 2026

‌ دوزتان من خیلی از همه چی عقبم انتخاب واحد کی شروع میشه؟

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @utsituation. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

کوی‌ستان
@Kooyestan · 42,727
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 29 August 2026
Ut.ac
@ut_ac · 38,962
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 31 August 2026
دانشگاه تهران
@UT_NEWSLINE · 55,652
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Management situation” (@utsituation), 1,153 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/utsituation.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.