Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for "Уволить ПОНАБа"

Channel

"Уволить ПОНАБа"

@uvolitPONABa

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

9,303subscribers

+77 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001267132998
TypeChannel
Username@uvolitPONABa
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/uvolitPONABa

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,2269,3129,2696 August 2026 — 9,226 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,226 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,233 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,254 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,295 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,308 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,309 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,304 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,298 subscribers3 September 2026 — 9,294 subscribers8 September 2026 — 9,302 subscribers12 September 2026 — 9,312 subscribers17 September 2026 — 9,303 subscribers9,3036 August 202617 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 42 days, net +77. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,213–9,325 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 03:579,303-9
12 Sept 2026, 20:589,312+10
8 Sept 2026, 16:369,302+8
3 Sept 2026, 18:399,294-4
31 Aug 2026, 10:179,298-6
25 Aug 2026, 16:239,304-5
22 Aug 2026, 23:279,309+1
19 Aug 2026, 23:069,308+13
16 Aug 2026, 17:449,295+41
12 Aug 2026, 18:579,254+21
9 Aug 2026, 21:119,233+7
6 Aug 2026, 10:419,226no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:059,226first reading

Engagement

35 posts held, back to 4 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
55.2%
avg views ÷ 9,303 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,140
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.64%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 35 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held35 (4 June 202628 August 2026)
Views total10,270
Reactions total168
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 07:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 01s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,639 reactions across 34 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,30523.1%
🤣1,14520.3%
💯95516.9%
92816.5%
😁5209.22%
🤔1693.00%
👏1472.61%
😢1081.92%
🔥1031.83%
🤬831.47%
🙊731.29%
🤷‍♂440.78%
🤯410.727%
😱180.319%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,783 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 18:33 UTC≈5,140 views143 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Господин Перцовский, пока вы вместе с президентом Зеленским в Молдове ищете деньги для проектов УЗ — деньги буквально лежат под ногами. Только успевай поднимать! К вашему сведению: уроженец Санта-Моники, штат Калифорния, США, 1960 года рождения, гражданин США Шон Джастин Пенн, вместе с Петром В., во время поездки, пребывая в нерабочем тамбуре пассажирского вагона №044-22853 (приписка ПКВЧ-7), выкурили с кайфом по це

😁69🤣4024👍10

28 Aug 2026, 18:33 UTC≈5,130 views25 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤣11😁83🤬3

21 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC≈10,800 views187 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Итоги народной симпатии на должность руководителя УЗ-Инфра. Неожиданно для ПОНАБа, каждый пятый респондент проголосовал за Романа Романыча — и он занял второе место. Это говорит о его высокой оценке среди путейцев. Первое место с результатом аж 36% занимает НЮЗЖД Дмитрий Копера. Очень высокий и показательный результат поддержки со стороны железнодорожников, который за последний год только вырос. Не рейтинг, а мечт

😁111🤣2419🤔18👍12🔥3

19 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC≈11,500 views137 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

А что ВЫ самое ценное эвакуируете во время тревоги? 😏

🤣1227👍6😁2

15 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC≈16,000 views172 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Гепард Хафер, что вы такого доложили в свое посольство, что немцы уже своих граждан на украинскую железную дорогу не пускают? Какие угрозы, какие удары? Вы зачем это все напридумывали?! Это на вас так заседание Набсовета в Ужгороде повлияло? А если серьёзно, то уже давно железная дорога стала одной из приоритетных целей для ударов свинорылых. Трагедии последней недели — лишнее тому подтверждение. И 24 августа нич

👍64🤣4725💯24😁9🤬2🤔1

14 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTC≈12,500 views110 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Poll

А кого вы, дорогие друзья, считаете достойным стать первым полноценным директором филиала УЗ Инфра?

  1. Черницкого надо назначать. Кто придумал — тот пусть запускает и разгребает.22%
  2. ЦБРК Калюжного ставьте. Он к реформе готов. Чего только стоит, как он марафоны бегает!10%
  3. ЦП Навора - самый подходящий вариант12%
  4. НЮЖД Копера — самый достойный кандидат… Не зря же в Сочельник с Ц пил по 50.36%
  5. ЦШ Бунчуков точно справится с этим филиалом8%
  6. Надо Тулея пристроить и сократить должность ЦЦИ12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🤔38🤣31🙊1511👍6👏6🤬3

14 Aug 2026, 12:20 UTC≈10,000 views85 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Инфре — быть!!! Как и предполагалось, новый филиал УЗ Инфра начнёт свою деятельность с 01.01.2027. Процессы перехода, переноса, передачи, развода, разделения и объединения уже запущены. У региональных филиалов остаются финальные четыре месяца на всю эту бюрократическую эпопею. В этом году, похоже, падут, как вид, последние из могикан — столетние дороги. Новое время. Новые реалии. Новые вызовы. Новый филиал… И во

🤔4114👍14😁6🙊6🤬4

14 Aug 2026, 10:23 UTC≈9,050 views177 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Наконец-то наш Министр Николай Калашник официально вышел с анонсом повышения зарплаты. То, что обещал ПОНАБу ещё несколько дней назад. На Гедройца Перцовский и Гриценко забарикадировались в кабинете номер 201 от назойливого Иванинива, который пытался пробраться сквозь закрытую дверь со словами "денег нет! денег нет!" По каждой из более чем 200 рабочих профессий проведён отдельный анализ действующих окладов. И реш

👍82🤣41😢21🤔1712🔥3🤬1

14 Aug 2026, 09:19 UTC≈8,940 views90 reactionsread 29 August 2026

P.S. И только новоиспечённый член Набсовета Саша Кава в тот вечер продолжал думать об Укрзализныце и никак не мог заснуть… Он вспоминал далёкий 2012 год, когда при «легитимном» Фёдоровиче отвечал за модернизацию тепловозов ЧМЭ3 новыми силовыми установками — и, конечно же, в духе того времени по «слегка» завышенным ценам. Но почему-то не срослось. Всё было провалено… Ну как всё — пару тепловозов всё-таки успели пок

🤣6014💯5🙊5🔥3🤬3

14 Aug 2026, 09:19 UTC≈8,860 views32 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤣257

14 Aug 2026, 09:18 UTC≈9,060 views68 reactionsread 29 August 2026

В среду на Гедройца было тихо и спокойно… а все потому, что Набсовет Укрзализныци собирался в далеком солнечном Закарпатье. ☀️ Злые языки утверждают, что заседание решили провести в Ужгороде не просто так. Говорят, Эльжбета Беньковская побаивается приезжать в Киев — то ли из-за обстрелов русских пидоров, то ли потому, что у неё нет пропуска на Южный мост. Поэтому Набсовет решил пойти ей навстречу и организовать кр

🤣5111👏3🤬2😁1

12 Aug 2026, 06:39 UTC≈9,580 views174 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Тут такое дело... Нам пишут, что на горизонте объявился тандем, который по праву может претендовать на звание главных коррупционеров в истории УЗ. Славчонок Ерёмин, похоже, решил вернуться в "большую игру" и каким-то образом уже умудрился протиснуться на собеседование на должность заместителя министра инфраструктуры. 🤯 Но одного направления ему мало: параллельно Славчонок продвигает своего "фунта-кошелька" Мураховс

💯9246👍15🤯9🤬8🤣4

Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @uvolitPONABa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTCFinal Results1,360 voters approx.

А кого вы, дорогие друзья, считаете достойным стать первым полноценным директором филиала УЗ Инфра?

  1. Черницкого надо назначать. Кто придумал — тот пусть запускает и разгребает.22%
  2. ЦБРК Калюжного ставьте. Он к реформе готов. Чего только стоит, как он марафоны бегает!10%
  3. ЦП Навора - самый подходящий вариант12%
  4. НЮЖД Копера — самый достойный кандидат… Не зря же в Сочельник с Ц пил по 50.36%
  5. ЦШ Бунчуков точно справится с этим филиалом8%
  6. Надо Тулея пристроить и сократить должность ЦЦИ12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Jul 2026, 11:48 UTCAnonymous Poll3,770 voters approx.

Как вы думаете, друзья, повысят ли руководители УЗ зарплату железнодорожникам?

  1. Не будет повышения. Наебут очередной раз30%
  2. Повысят на 50%... но только членам Набсовета6%
  3. Повысят на 10%, но перестанут выплачивать ежемесячную премию 15%21%
  4. Повысят на 20%, но заставят писать за свой счёт 4 дня каждый месяц9%
  5. Повысят на 1%2%
  6. 300. А дальше сами знаете что нужно сделать трактористу.32%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“"Уволить ПОНАБа"” (@uvolitPONABa), 9,303 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uvolitPONABa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.