Channel
@vaccinechoicecanada
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10,330subscribers
-213 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001375872751 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vaccinechoicecanada |
| Created | 24 March 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vaccinechoicecanada |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 14:36 | 10,330 | -13 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 00:19 | 10,343 | -3 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 05:20 | 10,346 | -8 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:38 | 10,354 | -3 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 13:19 | 10,357 | -9 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 21:59 | 10,366 | -13 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 16:17 | 10,379 | -5 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 18:58 | 10,384 | -7 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:47 | 10,391 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:24 | 10,394 | -12 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:23 | 10,406 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:24 | 10,410 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:12 | 10,413 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:38 | 10,419 | -6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:42 | 10,425 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 10,427 | -5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:59 | 10,432 | -7 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 23:54 | 10,439 | -8 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:58 | 10,447 | -9 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:09 | 10,456 | first reading |
35 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 35 (21 July 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 969 |
| Reactions total | 10 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 14:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
257 reactions across 33 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 103 | 40.1% | |
| ❤ | 62 | 24.1% | |
| 👏 | 33 | 12.8% | |
| 💯 | 26 | 10.1% | |
| 🤬 | 10 | 3.89% | |
| 😡 | 8 | 3.11% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 1.56% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 1.56% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 1.56% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.778% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.389% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 257 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Health Canada and public health officers imply that if everyone were vaccinated, no one would die or be harmed from measles. This statement ignores the known risks of measles vaccination, including disability and death, and the increased susceptibility to measles in infants and adults when the consequences can be more severe. Learn more about the illness and vaccine: https://tedkuntz.substack.com/p/what-the-public…
🙏2👍1
News that Sanofi shut down the RSV vaccine trial went largely unreported. The company didn’t report any safety issues with the vaccine, claiming instead that it ended the trial because the vaccine wasn’t as effective as hoped. A spokesperson for Sanofi said the child had an underlying congenital heart disease. Congenital disorders should have excluded babies from the study, and participants should have been assesse…
❤2
Every few years the claim is made that there is an outbreak of measles. Those sounding the alarm insist that children will die because of the outbreak. Often, the outbreak is blamed on those “irresponsible individuals” who refuse to get the measles vaccine. But is this true? Watch the full interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XyDXpKXzqAY&list=PLUqAewIPEF34NOBEZtxwSkXDmDLikKp5_&index=9
👍4❤1
A document recently disseminated by the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) entitled, Reduce the Risk of Getting or Spreading Measles, doesn’t disclose critical information about measles and the measles vaccine. This is what the PHAC isn’t telling you: As of June 27, 2025, there have been more than 117,063 reports of measles-vaccine reactions, hospitalizations, injuries, and deaths following measles vaccinations …
👍10❤3
We've been trained to believe something is true simply because an authority said it. Not because we researched it. Not because we experienced it. Just because we were told. Holistic pediatrician Dr. Lawrence Palevsky breaks down the four core principles the scientific method actually requires, and why most people have lost all four. Watch the full interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jWkJNKXifYA
👍5❤2
Pregnant mothers and newborn babies are routinely given a number of shots, one of them being the RhoGAM shot. Since the 1970’s, mothers-to-be whose blood work shows that they are Rh factor (Rhesus factor) negative are told to get a shot of Rh immunoglobulin (RhoGAM) during pregnancy, as well as after delivery if the baby is Rh positive. Is the RhoGAM shot really necessary for all Rh-negative mothers? Read the full…
👍3
The decision of whether to vaccinate yourself or your child will be one of the most important, and most difficult decisions you will be asked to make. Read Canary in a Covid World: How Propaganda and Censorship Changed Our (My) World’ https://childrenshealthdefense.org/store/canary-in-a-covid-world-how-propaganda-and-censorship-changed-our-my-world/
Western medicine is the only health system that doesn’t believe the body has the ability to heal itself. We've been trained to believe something is true simply because an authority said it. Holistic pediatrician Dr. Lawrence Palevsky breaks down the four core principles the scientific method actually requires, and why most people have lost all four. Watch the full interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jWkJNKXi…
👍5
If you have BOTH vaccinated and fully unvaccinated kids in your family, which ones are usually healthier? Read the full article and German KiGGS study: https://kirschsubstack.com/p/unvaccinated-kids-are-healthier https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3057555/
Holistic pediatrician Dr. Lawrence Palevsky breaks down the four core principles the scientific method actually requires — being comfortable with the unknown, comfortable with uncertainty, curious, and willing to be surprised. Watch the full interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jWkJNKXifYA
❤5
MENVO is recommended for those 2 months through 55 years of age to prevent invasive meningococcal disease caused by Neisseria meningitidis serogroups A, C, W-135 and Y. Download and read the full package insert! https://ca.gsk.com/media/yson14br/menveo.pdf
❤3
Usage of glyphosate on core crops has increased exponentially over the past two decades, in step with the exponential increase in autoimmune diseases. While correlation does not necessarily mean causation, causation becomes much more likely if a plausible mechanism can be found. Swanson et al. found a remarkable 0.98 correlation coefficient between the rise in autism rates in the USA and the use of glyphosate on cro…
😡5
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @vaccinechoicecanada. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Vaccine Choice Canada” (@vaccinechoicecanada), 10,330 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vaccinechoicecanada.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.