Channel
@vach_govorit
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
76,957subscribers
+3,481 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001720823061 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vach_govorit |
| Description | 🏛️Комментирую происходящее ☎️Сотрудничество/предложка: @vach_says_bot |
| Created | 17 January 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 57 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vach_govorit |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 16:47 | 76,957 | -79 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 16:59 | 77,036 | +584 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 14:49 | 76,452 | +68 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 17:17 | 76,384 | -81 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 13:45 | 76,465 | -51 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 13:36 | 76,516 | +75 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 13:57 | 76,441 | -52 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 14:19 | 76,493 | -70 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 14:38 | 76,563 | +130 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 14:19 | 76,433 | -80 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 13:41 | 76,513 | -88 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 13:27 | 76,601 | -85 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 14:30 | 76,686 | -120 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 12:10 | 76,806 | -154 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 03:30 | 76,960 | -118 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 22:35 | 77,078 | +122 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 01:28 | 76,956 | +34 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 22:29 | 76,922 | -22 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 21:31 | 76,944 | +6 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 22:34 | 76,938 | first reading |
2,170 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 185 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 2,170 (6 August 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 11,617,550 |
| Reactions total | 196,454 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 09:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 144 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
257,968 reactions across 1,000 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤬 | 64,486 | 25.0% | |
| 😁 | 40,559 | 15.7% | |
| custom 5274195706066781810 | 30,220 | 11.7% | |
| 🙏 | 29,120 | 11.3% | |
| 👍 | 17,602 | 6.82% | |
| 🤔 | 16,083 | 6.23% | |
| 🔥 | 13,571 | 5.26% | |
| 🤯 | 12,912 | 5.01% | |
| 😢 | 11,568 | 4.48% | |
| 👎 | 6,207 | 2.41% | |
| 😱 | 5,553 | 2.15% | |
| 👏 | 3,437 | 1.33% | |
| custom 5224708023435404637 | 2,113 | 0.819% | |
| 🫡 | 1,460 | 0.566% | |
| 🗿 | 1,331 | 0.516% | |
| 🌚 | 839 | 0.325% | |
| 💔 | 714 | 0.277% | |
| 😎 | 176 | 0.068% | |
| custom 5388784995437411028 | 17 | 0.007% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1,000 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 257,968 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 26 September 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vach_govorit. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 26 September 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 27 of 724 posts held from the last 30 days (3.73%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Зеленский поговорил по телефону со спецпосланником американского президента Уиткоффом и зятем Трампа Кушнером Обсуждены подготовка к переговорам в Абу-Даби и консультации технических групп Украины, США и Европы, которые проходят в Брюсселе.
🤬45🙏26😁8👍7🤔4
Кстати по поводу Ирана. Вчера ночью занимался фактчекингом и просмотрел весь эфир, он почти полтора часа занял😁 Короче выдыхаем. Ракеты на нас вроде не должны лететь из Ирана)
🙏82🤔12custom 52247080234354046376😁5👍1🤬1
Получается все, кто радуется проигрышу Трампу подыгрывают Ирану???😡
😁48🤔8custom 52741957060667818107🗿3🤬3🌚1
🌚Великая нация Ирана нанесла Дональду Трампу серьезное стратегическое поражение на поле боя и в Ормузском проливе, а также тяжелое политическое поражение в Вашингтоне. Американские граждане и власти вынуждены нести непомерно тяжелые издержки из-за воинственной политики Трампа. Каждый, кто осмелится противостоять Ирану, заплатит высокую цену – от поля боя до собственного порога, – заявил секретарь Высшего совета нацио…
👍47🤔14😁14🤬2
👨💼Украина отстает от Молдовы на пути к ЕС из-за коррупции. Кишинев может завершить переговоры о членстве в начале 2028 года, а Киеву для этого потребуется еще примерно год и ускорение темпов реформ, — FT со ссылкой на Еврокомиссию.
😁71🤔16👏11🤬4
❗️Антикоррупционные органы задержали заместителя начальника ДСР Нацполиции, - УП. «Прайс» на пленках - это Владимир Ценов, первый заместитель начальника Департамента стратегических расследований Нацполиции. По данным следствия, он отвечал за прикрытие колл-центров со стороны полиции.
🔥79🤔20🤬6😎6custom 52247080234354046372😢1
Видел еще такое видео про Харьков. Харьковчане, правду говорит или нет?
🔥193custom 527419570606678181070🤔17🤬7👎1
Защита энергообъектов вокруг Киева практически не была обеспечена, — депутат Киевсовета Ковалевская По её словам, столица сталкивается с отключениями света продолжительностью более 20 часов не только из-за вражеских ударов, но и из-за провала в подготовке защитных сооружений вокруг города. 5-й год войны подходит к концу. Наверное не знали, что Россия будет обстреливать Киев.
🤬168custom 527419570606678181046👏6😁6🤯3💔1🔥1
❗️Мы должны готовить ВСЕ население к способности защищать страну: мужчин, женщин – без ограничений, – заявил народный депутат Федор Вениславский.
🤬546👎73😁12🤔10👍7🔥4🤯3🗿1
❗️Сообщают, что ночью может быть массированный обстрел баллистика + дроны Повышенный уровень угрозы для: — Полтава — Днепр — Харьков — Киев — Борисполь — Наливайковка — Триполье — Тернополь — Луцк — Хмельницкий — Винница — Львов
🙏300🤬97😢13🔥5👎4💔4😁1
Разрушенные теплоэлектростанции ДТЭК после вчерашних российских ударов. Компания сообщает, что три теплоэлектростанции прекратили работу из-за масштабных разрушений.
😱119🙏31😢24🤬13👍3🔥2
❗️Трамп заявил, что не собирается отправлять в отставку главу Пентагона Пита Хегсета после поражения республиканцев на выборах в США.
😁110🤬16🤔11👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,170 posts we hold for @vach_govorit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@vach_govorit edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 5 posts on @vach_govorit as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
❗️Вы вообще смотрели сегодняшнее видео от НАБУ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Если бы выборы состоялись, за кого вы голосовали?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Теперь понимаете общую картину?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 26 September 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Вач Говорит” (@vach_govorit), 76,957 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vach_govorit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.