Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for vadim.chaly

Channel

vadim.chaly

@vadim8chaly

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

552subscribers

+31 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001706425406
TypeChannel
Username@vadim8chaly
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/vadim8chaly

Growth

521552536.58 August 2026 — 521 subscribers8 August 2026 — 521 subscribers16 August 2026 — 522 subscribers24 August 2026 — 521 subscribers30 August 2026 — 533 subscribers9 September 2026 — 551 subscribers18 September 2026 — 552 subscribers8 August 202618 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 41 days, net +31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 516–557 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 15:59552+1
9 Sept 2026, 09:40551+18
30 Aug 2026, 18:35533+12
24 Aug 2026, 07:59521-1
16 Aug 2026, 16:56522+1
8 Aug 2026, 22:28521no change
8 Aug 2026, 04:32521first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 11 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 41s
Average length
1m 21s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

619 reactions across 17 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
25340.9%
🔥11919.2%
😁8213.2%
❤‍🔥518.24%
👍436.95%
💯182.91%
💔91.45%
🤣71.13%
👀60.969%
💘60.969%
🥰50.808%
👏40.646%
30.485%
🌚20.323%
🍓20.323%
💊20.323%
😍20.323%
🤔20.323%
🕊10.162%
😢10.162%
1 further kind10.162%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 619 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 20:08 UTC133 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Сегодня увлёкся и ради красного словца навоображал сохранившуюся в Любеке таверну, где великий магистр Тевтонского ордена Герман фон Зальца и отцы города после неудач в Палестине замышляли завоевание прусских земель. Таверна не сохранилась, от подворья Тевтонского ордена остался только двор и памятная доска, но идея учреждения крестом, мечом и ганзейской маркой сияющего града на холме, названного в честь Царя Небесно

👍86

Signed Vadim Chaly

7 Aug 2026, 07:18 UTC201 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Лето летом, а дел меньше не становится. Сегодня в К. в 17 выступаю в “Сигнале” на книжном фестивале НЛО “Воображая Калининград” с серией философических медитаций о том, каким и как мне видится город. Видится и воображается. Нужна регистрация. https://nlobooks.ru/events/gumanitarnyy-festival-nlo-voobrazhaya-kaliningrad/

🔥135👍1

Signed Vadim Chaly

28 Jul 2026, 18:33 UTC422 views43 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Лучше тысячи слов

21❤‍🔥11🔥5💯4💔2

Signed Vadim Chaly

14 Jul 2026, 11:36 UTC595 views45 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

А Филинская бухта называлась “Розовое ущелье”, Rosenschlucht. Ой всё, хватит топонимики, скорее обратно к метафизике.

😁2512🔥7💊1

Signed Vadim Chaly

13 Jul 2026, 19:27 UTC567 views49 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Сижу, значит, на даче, углубляюсь в тонкости, мягкости и пухлости немецкого, дабы лучше критиковать вражескую мысль, и тут меня осеняет, что наш мыс Таран имел интересное название Brüsterort — а это, извините за неакадемический язык, "Место сись" или "Сисеместо". Но это ладно, могли случайно назвать, по ошибке. Стал искать разъяснения в литературе, а там написано целомудренно: нет, это не случайно, название происходи

😁2613🤣7👍2🔥1

Signed Vadim Chaly

3 Jul 2026, 13:13 UTC528 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @urbanistikastudyPhoto

Что нас ждет и как мы можем влиять на будущее! 7 июля в «Сигнале» состоится встреча-размышление с философом Вадимом Чалым, помогает урбанист Святослав Мурунов. Будущее не наступает. Его выбирают. Мы привыкли думать о будущем как о прогнозе — том, что случится с нами. Но у будущего нет собственной воли. Есть только сумма решений тех, кто перестал ждать и начал действовать. Между «что нас ждёт» и «на что мы влияем»

🔥533

Signed Vadim Chaly

3 Jul 2026, 13:12 UTC385 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Свят пригласил обсудить будущее. Постараюсь не быть скептиком, потому что добавлять к реализму оптимизм — мой профессиональный долг, как у медиков (кроме разве что патологоанатомов). В Кёниге сейчас главные вопросы о том, чего оттуда никак не изменить (разве что вы - новый Кант, но и к его тихой философии у практиков всегда были претензии). На эти вопросы и я не отвечу, могу только воспроизвести непримиримые нарратив

👍5🔥42

Signed Vadim Chaly

2 Jul 2026, 06:14 UTC415 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026

“Не геометр да не войдёт” — было написано над входом в платоновскую Академию. Есть мнение, что геометрическое мышление стало развиваться у первобытного человека, когда он присел и неожиданно открыл в себе способность к теории. Пространство первобытного человека — пространство действия и постоянной аффективной заботы по поводу непосредственных потребностей и интересов. На работу, домой, на шашлыки, к тёще, снова домой

😁1511👍4💊1🕊1

Signed Vadim Chaly

1 Jul 2026, 14:02 UTC361 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Цела, цела. Хотел Пушкиным засвидетельствовать, но проскочил.

😁104🔥1

Signed Vadim Chaly

30 Jun 2026, 10:59 UTC428 views39 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Что, как, цела ли ещё цивилизация? - такие вопросы возникают на шестой день отсутствия.

24🔥8❤‍🔥6🙏1

Signed Vadim Chaly

29 Jun 2026, 07:28 UTC526 views60 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Выступив про ИИ, вызвал на себя огонь некоторых математиков: что вы можете смыслить в ИИ со своим багажом? Был бы грубияном, ответил бы: а таки-вы что-то понимаете за интеллект? За искусственное и естественное? Может, расскажете, что есть число? Но нормальные люди так не разговаривают, поэтому вместо бифа я предложил отправиться в увлекательное путешествие по истории идеи ума от Парменида, Анаксагора, Аристотеля, чер

🔥2815👍8👏4💯4❤‍🔥1

Signed Vadim Chaly

27 Jun 2026, 11:02 UTC493 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026

У меня интересная перспектива из моего ковчега в гидрогавани: в одной части диапазона конференция "Философия будущего: идеи и смыслы", в другой рейв, по сути, ответ: спасибо, ваши смыслы, нарративы, воображаемые, фреймы и всё, всё остальное оставьте себе, нам эта оферта не интересна, будущего нет, есть только восьмитактовый луп, вечное тупое долбящее настоящее, дададада. Нетривиальная задача всех помирить.

19💯6😢1

Signed Vadim Chaly

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @vadim8chaly. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Калининград | Интересное | Новости
@Kaliningrad_life · 23,289
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“vadim.chaly” (@vadim8chaly), 552 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vadim8chaly.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.