Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
28 measurements spanning 78 days, net +1,030. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,992–10,331 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Oct 2026, 18:29
10,176
+6
23 Oct 2026, 15:44
10,170
+3
21 Oct 2026, 14:39
10,167
-5
20 Oct 2026, 10:28
10,172
+1
18 Oct 2026, 11:18
10,171
-1
17 Oct 2026, 10:46
10,172
+2
16 Oct 2026, 10:20
10,170
-3
15 Oct 2026, 13:56
10,173
+6
14 Oct 2026, 16:35
10,167
+4
13 Oct 2026, 04:38
10,163
+6
9 Oct 2026, 00:19
10,157
+15
4 Oct 2026, 16:55
10,142
+20
26 Sept 2026, 18:37
10,122
+38
17 Sept 2026, 09:58
10,084
+4
15 Sept 2026, 07:18
10,080
+8
13 Sept 2026, 16:41
10,072
-2
11 Sept 2026, 21:19
10,074
+6
9 Sept 2026, 09:01
10,068
+82
3 Sept 2026, 20:40
9,986
+84
31 Aug 2026, 04:08
9,902
first reading
Engagement
91 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 91 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
31m 59s
Average length
1m 47s
Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
963 reactions across 81 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
606
62.9%
👍
224
23.3%
👏
62
6.44%
👌
48
4.98%
🔥
17
1.77%
🙏
6
0.623%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 81 of the 91 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 963 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 91 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📌📌یه آموزش درست و اصولی باید طوری باشه که شما بعد دیدن دوره،بتونی روی نمونه واقعی برد اجرا بکنی،بعضی ها به اشتباه فقط دنبال تحلیل برد هستند درسته شما برای تعمیرات برد الکترونیک ونقشه خوانی رو بلد باشی،اما تو خیلی از موارد همه چیز روی نقشه درست پیش میره اما روی میز کار درست درنمیاد😉😉😉
👆😉یه تعمیرکار قدیمی تو بازار تعریف میکرد اوایل کارش تو بازار شهدای تهران فقط دوتا ۳نفر تعمیرکار برد بودند مشتری برد میاورد بهش میگفتیم برو دوماه دیگه بیا برای تحویل کارت،مشتری ناچار قبول میکرد،اما الان هرچقدر سریعتر کار رو تحویل بدی،همون اندازه درآمدت رو هم بیشتر میشه👏👏 حالا چطور یه برد رو سریع تعمیر کنیم؟؟👌👌
‼️زمان برای تعمیرکاران برد طلاست،هرچقدر شما برد رو زودتر تعمیر و عیب یابی کنید،همون اندازه بازگشت مشتری بیشتر هستش،وهمون مشتری چندتا مشتری دیگه هم برات میاره👌👌👌
📣📣تو دوره ی مینی رایگان میخوام هم تعمیرات برد بهت یاد بدم،هم بازاریابی رو به شکل قوی👏👏 که دیگه توشروع کار تعمیرات برد این چالش ها و دغدغه ها رو نداشته باشی😉😉😉
📌خیلی هاتون تو شروع کار اعتماد به نفس قیمت دادن ندارید،من تعمیرکار داشتم خوب هم کار میکرد میخواست به مشتری قیمت بده منو صدا میکرد میگفت مهندس تو قیمت رو بگو،میدیدم نمیتونه قیمت بده،خجالت میکشه،یادتون باشه قیمت بالا رو اعتماد به نفس میده،😉نه علم،بعضی تعمیرکارا با نصف تخصص شما 3برابر شما پول درمیارن👌👌چون بلدن مشتری روتوجیه کنن👍
❌❌برای درآمد بیشتر شما باید ظرفیت درآمدزایی رو بالاتر ببری،وقتی یک نفره اونم فقط روی بردهایی خاص تعمیرات انجام میدید نمیتونی به درآمد بالا برسی،شما باید فروش برد،آموزش تعمیرات رو به مجموعه خودت اضافه بکنی😊😊یه باور غلط اینکه خیلی هاتون آموزش رو جدی نمیگیرید میترسید دست زیاد بشه،مطمئن باش بازار تعمیرات برد اینقدر زیاده کسی جای کس دیگه ای رو نمیگیره👏
❌❌باور غلط سوم👇👇
هر چی عیب سختر باشه،درآمد بیشتری داره😉😉😉
بیشترین درآمد رو شما میتونید از عیب های تکراری مثل خرابی خازن،رله،ترانزیستور که تو کوتاه ترین زمان حل میشن داشته باشید،تعمیرکار حرفه ای به جای عیب یابی سخت،مشتری پرتعداد پیدا میکنه😉😉
❌❌باور غلط دوم👇👇
من هیچ دانش الکترونیکی ندارم😬😬بیشتر تعمیرکاران بردی که من میشناسم اصلا هیچ سواد الکترونیکی یا حتی دانشگاهی ندارن،فقط با صبر و حوصله توانستند تو این کار موفق بشن👏👏
✅اولین باور دروغ تو تعمیرات برد👇
برای تعمیر هر فردی قطعا به شماتیک اون برد احتیاج دارم😳😳
واقعیت شماتیک خیلی تو تعمیرات برد کمک میکنه اما پیدا کردن شماتیک تمام بردها سخت هستش😔من خودم به شخصه تمام تحلیل ها رو باتجربه بدست آوردم👍👍یه تعمیرکار حرفه ای با شناخت بلوک های اصلی،دنبال کردن مسیرهای ولتاژ میتونه تعمیرات برد رو انجام بده😊😊
🔥تو مسیر تعمیرات برد ۵تا باور غلط هستش،که امروز میخوام بهتون بگم که این ۵باور غلط چطوری تو رو از مسیر درآمدزایی دور کرده👍👍👍
❤8
Signed تعمیر برد درشرق تهران(09195145975)حاجیلو
Showing the 12 most recent of 91 posts we hold for @vahid_hajilouu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 91 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Power electronics @electronicghodrat · 19,303 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 2 October 2026
آموزش الکترونیک | دانشکده الکترونیک @electronic_college · 19,320 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 2 October 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“aghaye_board(آموزش برد)” (@vahid_hajilouu), 10,176 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vahid_hajilouu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.