Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ׁׅ᥎ׁׅɑׁׅᥣׁׅ֪ꫀׁׅܻ݊݊ꪀtׁׅꪱׁׁׁׅׅׅ݊ꪀᨵׁׅׅ

Channel

ׁׅ᥎ׁׅɑׁׅᥣׁׅ֪ꫀׁׅܻ݊݊ꪀtׁׅꪱׁׁׁׅׅׅ݊ꪀᨵׁׅׅ

@valblog_V

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

104subscribers

+35 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003912520152
TypeChannel
Username@valblog_V
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 20 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/valblog_V

Growth

69109899 August 2026 — 69 subscribers10 August 2026 — 69 subscribers16 August 2026 — 76 subscribers24 August 2026 — 105 subscribers1 September 2026 — 109 subscribers18 September 2026 — 104 subscribers1049 August 202618 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 40 days, net +35. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 63–115 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 21:35104-5
1 Sept 2026, 10:48109+4
24 Aug 2026, 20:28105+29
16 Aug 2026, 17:0876+7
10 Aug 2026, 00:1569no change
9 Aug 2026, 10:4769first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

36 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52291148144999526871233.3%
custom 54247231299917292061027.8%
custom 5305400181070533874822.2%
custom 5224445897286394061513.9%
custom 547224620438759240212.78%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 05:52 UTC38 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

✨#𝐯𝐀𝐋𝐁𝐋𝐎𝐠 - 𝓷𝓮𝔀 ρᨵ꯱𝗧⭐️ 🥹🥹🌩🌩🌩🌩🌩🌩 ✨🤩издец, ладно, ходи в чем хочешь. в принципе . . эти костюмы тебе тоже идут, у тебя это . . изюминка типо? заводит. 🤩 но думаю разнообразие тебе не помешает. 🤩 🍰🍰🍰 рубашка и шорты? я надеюсь, ты имеешь ввиду не ту убогую рубашку, про которую мы говорили сегодня в машине?! 🤩 🤩

custom 54247231299917292064custom 52244458972863940611custom 52291148144999526871

4 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTC43 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

✨#𝐯𝐀𝐋𝐁𝐋𝐎𝐠 - 𝓷𝓮𝔀 ρᨵ꯱𝗧⭐️ 🥹🥹🌩🌩🌩🌩🌩🌩 ✨🤩 да! я прекрасно знаю, что мое тело было максимально сексуально в нем. 💕💕 🤩ебе не понравилось🗝🗝 я даже не удивлен, все самое стильное на твоем теле тебе никогда не нравилось. 🤩 🤍ак ты блять вообще ходишь постоянно в своих деловых костюмах🌟🌟 🤩 🤩тебя будто кроме них вообще гардероба нет

custom 54247231299917292064custom 52291148144999526872custom 53054001810705338741

4 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC42 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

✨#𝐯𝐀𝐋𝐁𝐋𝐎𝐠 - 𝓷𝓮𝔀 ρᨵ꯱𝗧⭐️ 🥹🥹🌩🌩🌩🌩🌩🌩 ✨🌟риветик сучки! 💯 🤩ууу у нас недавно была новая коллекция, что то на подобии китайской моды.🤩 🌟 🤩не зашло то красное платье, что было на мне. оно ➖ безумно подошло мне по фасону, форме и цвету. 🤩 🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️ 🤍стати говоря, на счет одежды, 👍 Вокс наконец то нацепил на себя что-то, не 🤩🍷астолько деловое как обычно. 💞

custom 52244458972863940613custom 52291148144999526872custom 54247231299917292062custom 53054001810705338741

29 Jul 2026, 13:51 UTC80 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

✨#𝐯𝐀𝐋𝐁𝐋𝐎𝐠 - 𝓷𝓮𝔀 ρᨵ꯱𝗧⭐️ 🥹🥹🌩🌩🌩🌩🌩🌩 ✨🤩х, а я уже и забыл про это. . . 🤩 🤩се равно, ни одна из этих сучек не смогла добиться моего полного удовольствия. 🤩 🌟решники серьезно думают, что натянув какое то открытое белье, они сразу секс иконы!? 💞💞💞 🍷а это очень смешно смотреть, 🤩 но из всех кандидатов, я все таки выбрал парочку.

custom 53054001810705338743

28 Jul 2026, 11:02 UTC75 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

✨#𝐯𝐀𝐋𝐁𝐋𝐎𝐠 - 𝓷𝓮𝔀 ρᨵ꯱𝗧⭐️ 🥹🥹🌩🌩🌩🌩🌩🌩 ✨ ¿🌟ажется? 🤩нджел, это не должно казаться, это должно быть у тебя в голове без задних мыслей 🤩💞 🍷 тебя есть и будет все, если твоя работа не 👍разочарует меня еще больше.🤩 🤩ак вообще блять можно было променять 🤩ту роскошь на какой то . . ¿¡блять отель сучки Люцифера?! АХАХА ¡это даже тяжело блять представить! 🤩 🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️

custom 52291148144999526872

26 Jul 2026, 17:27 UTC69 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩 𝑰 𝒘𝒂𝒏𝒏𝒂 𝒔𝒆𝒆 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒐𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒇𝒍𝒐𝒐𝒓,𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒆 𝒐𝒏 𝒃𝒂𝒃𝒚 𝒈𝒊𝒗𝒆 𝒎𝒆 𝒔𝒐𝒎𝒆 𝒎𝒐𝒓𝒆 @𝑽𝒐𝒙 👍 🦋 - ты тоже.

custom 52291148144999526875custom 52244458972863940611custom 54722462043875924021

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @valblog_V. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ׁׅ᥎ׁׅɑׁׅᥣׁׅ֪ꫀׁׅܻ݊݊ꪀtׁׅꪱׁׁׁׅׅׅ݊ꪀᨵׁׅׅ” (@valblog_V), 104 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/valblog_V.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.