Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Валентина Гавриляк

Channel

Валентина Гавриляк

@valentinagavrilyak

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

13,789subscribers

+134 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001698807949
TypeChannel
Username@valentinagavrilyak
Descriptionрегистрация в РКН на № 6708504892 Главный врач "ГБУ БИЛ г. Мариуполя", главный кардиолог ДНР, координатор здравоохранения г. Мариуполя ВКонтакте: https://vk.com/vgavrilyak2021 Одноклассники: https://ok.ru/profile/580392907587?utm_campaign=android
Created2 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/valentinagavrilyak

Topic

Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

14,200 average views per post against 13,784 subscribers — an engagement rate of 102.7%. Across the 21,335 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,621 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.84% and 23.6%, with a median of 12.1%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured18 of 18 published in the window (0 exact, 18 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled254,770
Mature posts only102.7% over 18 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers13,784 measured 4 November 2026
Cohortb10000:rus · 21,335 channels · p10 2.94% · p25 5.84% · p50 12.1% · p75 23.6% · p90 42.5%
Position in cohort99.339th percentile · 8.5× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.213% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

12,61013,79113,200.56 August 2026 — 13,655 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,655 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,628 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,680 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,683 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,670 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,661 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,689 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,675 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,653 subscribers15 August 2026 — 13,666 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,716 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,733 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,727 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,741 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,744 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,745 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,733 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,737 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,729 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,751 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,737 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,537 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,733 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,750 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,747 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,738 subscribers4 September 2026 — 13,650 subscribers7 September 2026 — 13,741 subscribers10 September 2026 — 13,742 subscribers12 September 2026 — 13,721 subscribers14 September 2026 — 13,745 subscribers15 September 2026 — 13,736 subscribers18 September 2026 — 13,725 subscribers29 September 2026 — 13,764 subscribers5 October 2026 — 13,653 subscribers9 October 2026 — 13,256 subscribers13 October 2026 — 13,088 subscribers14 October 2026 — 13,075 subscribers16 October 2026 — 13,026 subscribers17 October 2026 — 13,024 subscribers18 October 2026 — 13,128 subscribers19 October 2026 — 13,751 subscribers20 October 2026 — 13,748 subscribers21 October 2026 — 13,724 subscribers22 October 2026 — 13,790 subscribers23 October 2026 — 13,788 subscribers24 October 2026 — 12,610 subscribers25 October 2026 — 13,558 subscribers26 October 2026 — 13,778 subscribers28 October 2026 — 13,529 subscribers29 October 2026 — 13,771 subscribers30 October 2026 — 13,768 subscribers31 October 2026 — 13,790 subscribers1 November 2026 — 13,785 subscribers3 November 2026 — 13,783 subscribers4 November 2026 — 13,784 subscribers5 November 2026 — 13,782 subscribers6 November 2026 — 13,791 subscribers7 November 2026 — 13,789 subscribers13,7896 August 20267 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 93 days, net +134. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,433–13,968 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 13:2913,789-2
6 Nov 2026, 12:0513,791+9
5 Nov 2026, 11:5013,782-2
4 Nov 2026, 09:2813,784+1
3 Nov 2026, 12:1013,783-2
1 Nov 2026, 08:3513,785-5
31 Oct 2026, 05:5013,790+22
30 Oct 2026, 03:4113,768-3
29 Oct 2026, 04:3813,771+242
28 Oct 2026, 00:4713,529-249
26 Oct 2026, 22:3113,778+220
25 Oct 2026, 20:0513,558+948
24 Oct 2026, 19:1612,610-1,178
23 Oct 2026, 20:5713,788-2
22 Oct 2026, 23:1913,790+66
21 Oct 2026, 17:4613,724-24
20 Oct 2026, 10:5913,748-3
19 Oct 2026, 07:4013,751+623
18 Oct 2026, 05:0913,128+104
17 Oct 2026, 01:5613,024first reading

Engagement

83 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
100.2%
avg views ÷ 13,789 subscribers
Avg views / post
13,800
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.80%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 83 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held83 (30 July 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total304,080
Reactions total5,474
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 18:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈5,730
Videos
≈519
Links
≈944

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
45m 07s
Average length
2m 09s

Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

14,722 reactions across 81 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3,68825.1%
❤3,60824.5%
🔥2,82719.2%
👏1,3549.20%
🙏7495.09%
😍5633.82%
💯4212.86%
❤‍🔥4092.78%
🥰3622.46%
🤩3382.30%
😁2831.92%
👌1150.781%
🫡30.02%
🤔10.007%
🤝10.007%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 82 of the 83 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,940 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 83 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
322
across the posts below
Posts paid on
64
of 83 we hold a reading for · 77%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @valentinagavrilyak. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 83 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 8 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 22 posts held from the last 30 days (13.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 10:33 UTC≈9,150 views193 reactions5 Starsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Дорогие друзья! Благодарю за #обратнуюсвязь ❤️

❤128😍61👍3👏1

7 Nov 2026, 06:02 UTC≈13,300 views231 reactions5 Starsread 8 November 2026

Боль в груди при вдохе: всегда ли это сердце? Как отличить опасный симптом от мышечной боли. Боль в грудной клетке — один из самых тревожных симптомов, с которым пациенты обращаются к врачу. Особенно если неприятные ощущения усиливаются при глубоком вдохе, поворотах корпуса или движении. Многие сразу думают об инфаркте. Другие, наоборот, успокаивают себя тем, что это «просто остеохондроз» или межрёберная невралгия.…

❤56🤩46❤‍🔥44🔥44👍41

6 Nov 2026, 06:08 UTC≈13,800 views205 reactions5 Starsread 8 November 2026
Video

На приёме был пациент, которому требовалось дополнительное кардиологическое обследование. Помимо основного заболевания, у него выраженный артроз коленных суставов. Передвигаться человеку очень тяжело: он ходит с тростью, а во время посещения медицинских учреждений его сопровождает внук. В такой ситуации даже обычный поход в поликлинику превращается в настоящий квест. Добраться до медицинского учреждения, пройти неск…

💯51❤45👍40🔥35❤‍🔥34

5 Nov 2026, 11:15 UTC≈11,900 views247 reactions5 Starsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Премия «ПроДокторов» — одна из крупнейших федеральных независимых платформ оценки качества медицинской помощи. Её особенность в том, что рейтинг врачей формируется на основании реальных отзывов и оценок пациентов, а значит, отражает их личный опыт и доверие. В этом году по итогам Всероссийской премии «ПроДокторов — 2026» заняла 1-е место среди врачей-кардиологов Донецкой Народной Республики. Для меня это прежде все…

❤‍🔥73❤61🔥56🤩55👏2

4 Nov 2026, 05:01 UTC≈8,760 views172 reactions5 Starsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Дорогие Мариупольцы. Примите искренние поздравления с Днём народного единства — главным праздником многонационального народа России. В сердце каждого из нас живёт любовь к Родине — она объединяет людей разных поколений и культур, помогает преодолевать любые испытания. Наш город — часть большой семьи, где чтят традиции, заботятся о старших и плечом к плечу трудятся представители, пожалуй, всех народов России — стро…

❤40🤩36🥰35😍31👍30

3 Nov 2026, 08:02 UTC≈11,500 views152 reactions5 Starsread 8 November 2026
Photo

У пожилых людей действительно есть такая особенность, как изолированная систолическая артериальная гипертензия (ИСАГ). Это состояние, при котором систолическое («верхнее») давление стабильно превышает 140 мм рт. ст., а диастолическое («нижнее») остаётся в пределах нормы — менее 90 мм рт. ст. Это наиболее распространённая форма повышения артериального давления у людей старше 60 лет. В данном случае необходимо обрат…

👍33😍33❤31❤‍🔥28🔥27

2 Nov 2026, 06:44 UTC≈12,000 views224 reactions5 Starsread 8 November 2026
Video

Коронарография — совсем не страшная процедура. Это один из самых точных и безопасных методов оценки состояния коронарных артерий. Пациент находится в сознании, всё проходит под тщательным контролем специалистов, а дискомфорт минимальный. Современные технологии позволяют выполнить исследование быстро, точно и с максимальной заботой о пациенте. Запись на консультацию ко мне: 📲 +7 949 891-50-00 Показания для приёма:…

❤66😍42👍41🤩39🔥36

1 Nov 2026, 09:30 UTC≈12,600 views275 reactions5 Starsread 8 November 2026
Photo

ОБЯЗАТЕЛЬНО ЛИ ЗАВТРАКАТЬ ПО УТРАМ? РАЗБИРАЕМСЯ, ГДЕ ФАКТЫ, А ГДЕ ПРИВЫЧНЫЙ МИФ «Завтрак — самый важный приём пищи», «Не поешь утром — нарушишь обмен веществ», «Пропуск завтрака неизбежно приведёт к лишнему весу». Подобные утверждения знакомы практически каждому. Но насколько они соответствуют научным данным? В 2019 году в журнале British Medical Journal был опубликован метаанализ 13 рандомизированных исследований…

❤59👍57🔥57🥰53💯49

31 Oct 2026, 11:55 UTC≈15,400 views284 reactions5 Starsread 8 November 2026

❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ В федеральном отраслевом СМИ «ФармМедПром» вышел новый материал с моим комментарием о теме, которая касается каждого, независимо от возраста, — профилактике инсульта. Сегодня инсульт перестал быть исключительно проблемой пожилых людей. Сосудистая катастрофа может произойти и в молодом возрасте, поэтому так важно понимать факторы риска, знать первые симптомы и не терять драгоценное время при их появлении. …

❤76🔥59🤩53👍48💯48

30 Oct 2026, 07:42 UTC≈10,500 views246 reactions5 Starsread 8 November 2026

Можно ли снизить давление, не бегая и не занимаясь кардио? Оказывается, даже упражнения без движения могут положительно влиять на артериальное давление. Что показало новое исследование 2026 года, почему важна регулярность и могут ли статические нагрузки стать частью профилактики гипертонии? Разбираю научные данные и объясняю, что важно знать, прежде чем включать такие упражнения в свои тренировки. Читайте полную с…

👍75❤63😍63💯43👌2

29 Oct 2026, 10:29 UTC≈14,100 views295 reactions5 Starsread 8 November 2026
Video

Клинический случай: боль в сердце спустя два года после инфаркта. Что насторожило меня на приёме? На приём обратилась пациентка с жалобами на боли в области сердца, возникающие на фоне повышения артериального давления. На первый взгляд может показаться, что причина боли очевидна: давление повышается — сердце реагирует. Но в кардиологии особенно важно не останавливаться на первом объяснении, а оценивать всю клиничес…

👍82❤‍🔥65🔥57❤52🥰39

28 Oct 2026, 14:11 UTC≈13,300 views217 reactions5 Starsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @bilmrplVideo

В Больнице интенсивного лечения г. Мариуполя работает кабинет диспансерного учёта пациентов кардиологического профиля Если вы перенесли инфаркт хотя бы раз в жизни (давность не важна), у вас хроническая сердечная недостаточность, нарушение ритма, были операции на сердце или сосудах, обязательно встаньте на диспансерный учёт! Кабинет находится в поликлинике №2 по адресу: ул. Ленина, 80. Что это даёт? Дальнейшие обс…

🔥210👍5❤2

Showing the 12 most recent of 83 posts we hold for @valentinagavrilyak. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Sept 2026, 06:09 UTCAnonymous Poll117 voters

Как вы засыпаете?

  1. Быстро, минут за 5 когда бы не лег15%
  2. Долго ворочаюсь, листаю телефон44%
  3. Засыпаю только в тишине и в темноте21%
  4. Стресс не дает спать21%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Aug 2026, 06:14 UTCAnonymous Poll321 voters

Домашняя аптечка глазами кардиолога: что должно быть дома, а что пора выбросить?!

  1. Написать пост99%
  2. У меня и так хорошая аптечка1%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTCAnonymous Poll182 voters

9. После установки стента сердце полностью здорово?

  1. Да, проблема решена навсегда1%
  2. Нет, стент открывает один участок сосуда, но не отменяет риск нового атеросклероза99%
  3. После стента можно забыть про таблетки1%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Aug 2026, 09:19 UTCAnonymous Poll186 voters

8. Если давление повышается только «на нервах» — это не гипертония?

  1. Да, стресс не считается проблемой1%
  2. Нет, регулярные скачки давления требуют оценки98%
  3. Нужно просто меньше нервничать1%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Aug 2026, 09:18 UTCAnonymous Poll195 voters

7. Молодым людям инфаркт практически не грозит?

  1. Да, до 40 лет можно не переживать1%
  2. Риск ниже, но он существует, особенно при наследственности, курении и высоком холестерине99%
  3. Инфаркт бывает только у пожилых0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Aug 2026, 09:17 UTCAnonymous Poll204 voters

6. Если болит сердце — нужно принять валидол или корвалол?

  1. Да, это первая помощь при любой боли в груди0%
  2. Нужно просто полежать — всё пройдет0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 83 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 8 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Валентина Гавриляк” (@valentinagavrilyak), 13,789 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/valentinagavrilyak.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.