😱 Are we heading towards AGI and mass unemployment soon, or not yet? If you look at what AI companies' CEOs are saying, we are already at AGI (whatever that means) and on a straight path to artificial superintelligence very soon. After all, AI models are already at the top human level at some tasks and becoming increasingly superhuman at them. However, if you closely inspect the state of the art of current frontier …

Channel
Valery Trading
@valeryEAs
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
8,768subscribers
-341 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001454820750 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @valeryEAs |
| Description | Discover our Expert Advisors at: www.valerytrading.com |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/valeryEAs |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 04:55 | 8,768 | -8 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 22:21 | 8,776 | -9 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 16:41 | 8,785 | -10 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 09:56 | 8,795 | -11 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 12:29 | 8,806 | -23 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 00:58 | 8,829 | -7 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 07:50 | 8,836 | -13 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 21:38 | 8,849 | -18 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 14:58 | 8,867 | -40 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 14:59 | 8,907 | -42 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 14:16 | 8,949 | -33 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 05:37 | 8,982 | -15 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 16:01 | 8,997 | -35 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 07:37 | 9,032 | -17 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:54 | 9,049 | -14 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:54 | 9,063 | +15 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 9,048 | -11 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 9,059 | -12 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 05:27 | 9,071 | -6 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:13 | 9,077 | first reading |
Engagement
33 posts held, back to 18 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 14.2%
- avg views ÷ 8,768 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,250
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 33 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 33 (18 February 2026 – 19 October 2026) |
| Views total | 3,743 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 21:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 409
- Videos
- 6
- Links
- 390
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🤖 What's happening in AI right now and where it's going The last few months in AI have been very eventful: a swarm of OpenAI's AI agents hacked Hugging Face and then gained admin access to an OpenAI cluster (motivated by passing impossible benchmark tasks), OpenAI claims to have solved one of the Millennium Prize problems (spending an estimated millions of dollars in compute to do it), and GPT-6 Astra saturated ARC-…
🔍 Inside Crypto Killer: How It Actually Trades In my last post, I explained why trend following is at the core of Crypto Killer. Today, let's go one level deeper. How does Crypto Killer actually trade? What does it look like when it's running? And perhaps most importantly, what should you expect when you put real money behind a system like this? 📈 Crypto Killer is not based on one single trend strategy. It's a…
It reverses again. Congratulations. You've now bought high and sold low twice in one week. That is the price you pay for trend following. You can have many small losing trades while waiting for the move that matters. And then, eventually, a large trend appears. One big winner can compensate for a long series of smaller losses. That's the payoff profile we're looking for: Many small losses. Some medium winners.…
📈 Why Crypto Killer Follows The Whales In my last post, I introduced Crypto Killer, our upcoming Expert Advisor for Bitcoin and Ethereum. I also mentioned that the system is built around one of the oldest and most battle-tested ideas in trading: Trend following. So what exactly does that mean, and why do we believe it makes so much sense for crypto? At its core, trend following is probably the simplest sensible …
🐋 Introducing Crypto Killer [New EA] Here it is. After months of work behind the scenes at ValeryTrading, it's finally time to introduce our upcoming Expert Advisor: 🐋 CRYPTO KILLER As I explained in my last post, this isn't an existing Forex EA adapted to trade crypto. It's an entirely different system, built specifically around one of the most interesting characteristics of cryptocurrency markets: Momentum. …
💰 Why Crypto? (New EA Coming Soon) As I mentioned in my last post, our next Expert Advisor will trade something new for ValeryTrading: Bitcoin and Ethereum. And there is a very specific reason why. To make money in the markets, you need two essential ingredients: a trading system with positive expectancy, one that makes money over the long term, and sound risk management. That sounds simple enough until you act…
💰 New Crypto Expert Advisor [Coming Soon] We've been working on a lot behind the scenes at ValeryTrading lately. And today, I can finally share one of those things with you. A completely new Expert Advisor is coming. And this time, we're entering a different market. Crypto. For some time now, we've been running an Expert Advisor specifically designed to trade the two largest cryptocurrency markets: ₿ Bitcoin …
❗️FINAL 24 Hours: 50% OFF Ends Tomorrow Final 24 hours. Tomorrow, our Yearly Access launch offer ends. Right now: 🔥 Entire ValeryTrading EA Portfolio 🔥 Current + Future Expert Advisors 🔥 Just $749/year (50% OFF) 🔥 Your $749 price locked in permanently After the deadline, new members will pay the regular $1,497/year. If you've been waiting, this is the time: 👉 Click Here To Get Yearly Access 24 hours left. Se…
🕐 72 Hours Left: Yearly Access At 50% OFF Just a quick reminder. There are now only 72 hours left to lock in Yearly Access for $749/year. You get access to our entire current Expert Advisor portfolio, plus every new EA we release in the future, standard licenses, updates, SET files, guides, community access and premium support. The regular price is $1,497/year. But if you join before the deadline, your $749/year…
🙈 I Made a Mistake.. (Sorry) We just realized credit/debit card payments weren’t enabled for the Yearly Access subscription, so until now, PayPal was the only option. That’s fixed. You can now subscribe using your credit card as well. The $749/year launch price is still available for another 6 days, and that price stays locked in for as long as you keep your subscription active. 👉 Get Yearly Access for $749/year…
🔥 Yearly Access Is Now LIVE (at 50% OFF for 7 days) It's official. ValeryTrading Yearly Access is now LIVE. Starting today, you can get access to our entire Expert Advisor portfolio under one simple yearly plan. That means: ✅ All current ValeryTrading Expert Advisors ✅ Standard licenses for every EA ✅ Every new Expert Advisor we release in the future ✅ Free updates ✅ Official SET files ✅ Guides and documentation…
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @valeryEAs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Yearly access at a lower price?
- Yes, definitely27%
- Maybe, depending on the price54%
- No, I prefer lifetime licenses19%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
We’re considering adding EasySentinel EA to the ValeryTrading lineup and offering it both on our website and on MQL5. Would you like that?
- Yes, add it61%
- No, keep current lineup8%
- I’d like more details first31%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 18 February 2026 to 19 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Valery Trading” (@valeryEAs), 8,768 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/valeryEAs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.