Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝙫𝙖𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙚𝙨

Channel

𝙫𝙖𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙚𝙨

@valites

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

812subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002473546025
TypeChannel
Username@valites
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/valites

Growth

807812809.56 August 2026 — 809 subscribers6 August 2026 — 809 subscribers12 August 2026 — 808 subscribers19 August 2026 — 807 subscribers26 August 2026 — 809 subscribers2 September 2026 — 812 subscribers6 August 20262 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 27 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 806–813 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 17:43812+3
26 Aug 2026, 10:06809+2
19 Aug 2026, 12:56807-1
12 Aug 2026, 20:48808-1
6 Aug 2026, 20:56809no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:04809first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

117 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53913158263914038305647.9%
custom 54024569801471639453227.4%
custom 54157069585502892472924.8%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC21 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @mei0lin0Photo

•Stickers @mei0lin0" |• #JennaGilbert You take it? + in the comments

6 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC20 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @aveniusPhoto

Фиби Тонкин. взяли? «+» в комм. #фибитонкин #селебрити

6 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC14 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @syyylvainePhoto

🧸 ✍️ Юля Гаврилина – 45 штук – нарезки {16:9} взяли? отметьте мой канала

6 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC22 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @gwqenqPhoto

#edit by gwenq link 🔤 xml 𝜗𝜚 ゛🔤ark credits if you take it.

6 Aug 2026, 11:43 UTC19 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @vainisvPhoto

🕷️ stickers w sabrina carpenter. #сабринакарпентер🔤#селебрити

6 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC26 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @babekxsPhoto

Аним.Стикерпак с Клэр Холт Кол-во: 20 штучек Хэштеги: #КлэрХолт #селебрити #Babekxs #анимстикерпак

6 Aug 2026, 11:24 UTC21 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @kvilniksPhoto

🐈‍⬛ ☆ 🔤цп с Томом★ - | 6м 15с| 2.35:1 | ? >> #сцп #ТомРеддл взял? «+» в ком & отметь

6 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC65 viewsread 6 August 2026

Приму выборочно несколько запросов. ❤️ на вашем сообщении означает что запрос принят

5 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC36 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @yoonuwgsPhoto

♱ new avatars - #normanreedus ➤ #avatars ⇆ #photo (×85) 𐙚 if you took the material “+” in comm ^@yoonuwgs^

custom 53913158263914038301

5 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC43 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @virellastarslPhoto

🐶⚫️⚫️⚫️ ⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️ 📤150x from the Virella 💤 📤all material in the comments. Boost for our channel 🤩 Do not take material for your own fucking channels.

custom 54024569801471639451

5 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTC452 views63 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤩 ›› пиппа фитц-амоби. — 373 штук - нарезки [16:9]. взяли? отметьте наш канал. проголосовать за канал.

custom 539131582639140383027custom 540245698014716394518custom 541570695855028924718

31 Jul 2026, 06:30 UTC825 views52 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤩 ›› рапунцель. — 60 штук - стикеры [1:1]. взяли? + в комментариях. проголосовать за канал.

custom 539131582639140383028custom 540245698014716394513custom 541570695855028924711

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @valites. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝙫𝙖𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙚𝙨” (@valites), 812 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/valites.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.