Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ari’s telegrams

Channel

ari’s telegrams

@valuated

9 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

34subscribers

+12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003917238310
TypeChannel
Usernames@annihilation @bitched @breakcore @egocentric @fissure @legionary @penal @rosary @valuated
Created6 July 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/valuated

Growth

234186 August 2026 — 22 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23 subscribers12 August 2026 — 23 subscribers13 August 2026 — 24 subscribers16 August 2026 — 25 subscribers16 August 2026 — 25 subscribers17 August 2026 — 27 subscribers18 August 2026 — 2 subscribers18 August 2026 — 27 subscribers18 August 2026 — 27 subscribers19 August 2026 — 27 subscribers19 August 2026 — 27 subscribers20 August 2026 — 27 subscribers23 August 2026 — 29 subscribers24 August 2026 — 29 subscribers25 August 2026 — 28 subscribers25 August 2026 — 28 subscribers25 August 2026 — 28 subscribers26 August 2026 — 28 subscribers26 August 2026 — 29 subscribers27 August 2026 — 29 subscribers30 August 2026 — 30 subscribers31 August 2026 — 30 subscribers31 August 2026 — 30 subscribers1 September 2026 — 3 subscribers1 September 2026 — 34 subscribers2 September 2026 — 34 subscribers2 September 2026 — 34 subscribers6 August 20262 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 27 days, net +12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 10:0734no change
2 Sept 2026, 04:1234no change
1 Sept 2026, 20:1534+31
1 Sept 2026, 20:083-27
31 Aug 2026, 15:3630no change
31 Aug 2026, 05:5430no change
30 Aug 2026, 18:3630+1
27 Aug 2026, 14:3429no change
26 Aug 2026, 22:2529+1
26 Aug 2026, 17:0328no change
25 Aug 2026, 20:5428no change
25 Aug 2026, 05:1228no change
25 Aug 2026, 04:3628-1
24 Aug 2026, 01:1829no change
23 Aug 2026, 05:1429+2
20 Aug 2026, 16:3827no change
19 Aug 2026, 14:2327no change
19 Aug 2026, 00:1227no change
18 Aug 2026, 22:0527no change
18 Aug 2026, 21:4727first reading

Engagement

2 posts held, back to 6 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 2 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

6 Jul 2026, 18:58 UTC≈2,180 viewsread 11 August 2026

@nyaa 20k (firm) @gimp 15k @bitched 5k @egocentric 3.5k @fissure 3k @penal 3k @rosary 3k @legionary 2.5k @inept 2.5k @annihilation 2.5k @temerity 2k @breakcore 2k @reina 1.5k @valuated 1k all negotiable All owned, Non proxy. Any trusted MM is accepted contact: @devotion oguser.com/princess sold: @lewd @flew @amputee @serene @delightful @ended

Showing the 2 most recent of 2 posts we hold for @valuated. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,472,732 of 1,629,403 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ari’s telegrams” (@valuated), 34 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/valuated.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.