Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for отзывы VANTAR

Channel

отзывы VANTAR

@vantareviews

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003831007351
TypeChannel
Username@vantareviews
Description@CensoredBeef дизайнер @v1ntar студия
Created28 January 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/vantareviews

Growth

38 August 2026 — 3 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3 subscribers8 August 202613 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2–4 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 16:023no change
8 Aug 2026, 11:323first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 28 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 28 January 2026 to 5 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 May 2026, 15:31 UTC73 viewsread 13 August 2026

Брала оформление у этого прекрасного человека @CensoredBeef. Сделал все просто супер и даже превзошел мои ожидания. Обязательно вернусь ещё!

10 Apr 2026, 11:45 UTC87 viewsread 13 August 2026

заказывала оформление для кф. Сделал всё по запросу, даже лучше. Воплощение идеальное. Цены ниже, чем в других студиях. Вернусь обязательно ещё 🌟

1 Apr 2026, 18:01 UTC100 views0 reactionsread 13 August 2026

работа сделана очень хорошо и очень быстро. я вам руки целовал. спасибо огромное,обязательно обращусь к вам еще!

29 Mar 2026, 21:56 UTC90 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Всё чудесно, заказываю уже второй раз, очень доволен проделанной работой. Автору огромная благодарность, передал всю атмосферу, хотя объяснили все вкратце. 🫶🏻

1

28 Mar 2026, 18:48 UTC79 viewsread 13 August 2026

Как же вы ахуенно делаете, это просто ВАУ! Смогли сделать работу по которой нет даже чёткого ТЗ, но очень удивили. Цена просто пушка, я считаю, вы должны брать больше за свою работу.

26 Mar 2026, 17:33 UTC78 viewsread 13 August 2026

Очень благодарен за качественную работу. Сразу поняли, что хочет заказчик и сделали все быстро. По соотношению цена и качество, очень порадовало. Атмосфера во время работы была приятной. Обязательно обращусь еще и вам советую ❤️

24 Mar 2026, 12:03 UTC70 viewsread 13 August 2026

работа супер, качество на высшем уровне. Все сделали, как и ожидал, в нужные сроки. Обязательно буду обращаться еще, спасибо огромное)❤️

11 Mar 2026, 05:00 UTC111 viewsread 13 August 2026

Хочу сказать огромнейшее спасибо, работа выполнена качественно и безумно быстро, владелец вежлив и приятен в общении. Буду ни раз сюда обращаться.

6 Mar 2026, 14:12 UTC122 views0 reactionsread 13 August 2026

за менее чем сутки мне выполнили превосходную работу. очень благодарен студии и владельцу за качество и скорость. обязательно обращусь снова

12 Feb 2026, 20:46 UTC128 viewsread 13 August 2026

хочу сказать огромное спасибо этой студии, все вышло очень прелестно и я очень доволен результатом. сначала я переживал, поймут ли мою задумку, как оказалось, зря боялся. результат идеальный, в самую точку. общение на протяжении всего времени было тоже отличное — очень бережное и внимательное отношение к клиенту. вы вкладываете душу в то, что делаете, и это чувствуется в каждой детали. спасибо еще раз огромное

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @vantareviews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“отзывы VANTAR” (@vantareviews), 3 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vantareviews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.