СМОТРЕТЬ ВСЕМ!!!!
🔥5❤🔥3👏1

Channel
@vashavedushaya
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
461subscribers
+11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001859111987 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vashavedushaya |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vashavedushaya |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 23:19 | 461 | -1 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 16:38 | 462 | -5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:38 | 467 | +5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:09 | 462 | +4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:24 | 458 | +6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:12 | 452 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 450 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:05 | 450 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
157 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 94 | 59.9% | |
| custom 5251737115917560715 | 25 | 15.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 5.73% | |
| custom 5397790042913514502 | 8 | 5.10% | |
| 🆒 | 8 | 5.10% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 3.82% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 2.55% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 1.91% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 157 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
СМОТРЕТЬ ВСЕМ!!!!
🔥5❤🔥3👏1
Сидите? А у меня тут интервью между прочим вышло!!! СО МНОЙ!!!!
🔥5👏2
Сегодня последний день нашего свадебного путешествия. Мне подарили кепку нашего отеля со словами «for Anastasiia, for my dear friend» 😂 Как же я люблю людей, которые всем сердцем любят меня!!!! 😂❤️❤️
🔥14
Внезапно моя страничка в запретограме стала местом пропаганды семейных ценностей На нашей свадьбе мы повторили торт по рецепту моей бабушки, которой не стало год назад и которая мечтала быть со мной в этот прекрасный день Если вы сегодня ещё не плакали от минутного видео, то самое время его посмотреть))
🔥14❤🔥1🆒1
В запретограм выложила видео, где мы танцуем с папой То, что для меня было абсолютной нормой, заставило плакать и улыбаться 5 МИЛЛИОНОВ человек! Я в шоке. Мы открыли какую-то чакру любви, а на нас обрушился водопад пожеланий здоровья и счастья. Купаюсь в доброте незнакомцев уже третий день. Мир полон прекрасных людей ❤️
🔥17custom 52517371159175607154custom 53977900429135145024🆒1
Вчера опять вернулась на выставку «Любовь земная и любовь небесная» Я видела много красивых экспозиций, бывала в разных музеях мира, но так сильно, как собрание Маковских (а точнее Константина), меня не трогало ничего Цвет, свет, чистота, нежность. Немыслимо красиво! Если ещё не были в музее Фаберже, обязательно туда отправляйтесь! Мечтаю теперь об этом каталоге 🥹❤️
🔥7❤🔥2🆒1
На Первом канале показали, как сильно я люблю своих подруг Это они приехали на нашу роспись ❤️💍
custom 525173711591756071517🆒1
Год назад запустила свой подкаст «Успешные и неизвестные», а сегодня на интервью уже пригласили МЕНЯ🥹 Давать интервью – очень приятно, не зря я периодически даю его вымышленному интервьюеру. Сегодня наконец-то передо мной был живой человек! 😂 Совсем скоро наш разговор выйдет на канале «Головкова говорит»! Ссылкой обязательно поделюсь!))
🔥12😁4🆒1
Люблю свою работу за то, что могу сиять в рандомную пятницу в 14:00 ✨ Провели сегодня юбилей банка «Зенит» Всех наградила, всех похвалила, всех полюбила!
🔥7custom 53977900429135145024🆒1
Мои рассказы о телевизионном пути заметили на ТЭФИ 🔥❤️ мы на шаг ближе к Орфею)))
🔥5❤🔥3👏3🆒1
Некогда телеведущая канала Москва 24 рассказала о своем журналистском пути в соцсетях. @TEFI_Russia
🔥8custom 52517371159175607154😍3🆒1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @vashavedushaya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ведущая Всемогущая 🎤” (@vashavedushaya), 461 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vashavedushaya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.