Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for vashtro

Channel

vashtro

@vashindaroy

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

17,580subscribers

+2,164 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002497289865
TypeChannel
Username@vashindaroy
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/vashindaroy

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

15,41617,58016,4989 August 2026 — 15,416 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,422 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,508 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,595 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,644 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,698 subscribers15 August 2026 — 15,802 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,843 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,972 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,009 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,044 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,098 subscribers21 August 2026 — 16,120 subscribers23 August 2026 — 16,152 subscribers25 August 2026 — 16,210 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,227 subscribers27 August 2026 — 16,261 subscribers28 August 2026 — 16,312 subscribers29 August 2026 — 16,356 subscribers29 August 2026 — 16,374 subscribers31 August 2026 — 16,407 subscribers1 September 2026 — 16,469 subscribers2 September 2026 — 16,529 subscribers3 September 2026 — 16,553 subscribers5 September 2026 — 16,622 subscribers8 September 2026 — 16,771 subscribers11 September 2026 — 16,917 subscribers13 September 2026 — 17,031 subscribers14 September 2026 — 17,183 subscribers16 September 2026 — 17,354 subscribers18 September 2026 — 17,580 subscribers9 August 202618 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 41 days, net +2,164. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,091–17,905 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 21:1817,580+226
16 Sept 2026, 15:0117,354+171
14 Sept 2026, 20:3917,183+152
13 Sept 2026, 05:0217,031+114
11 Sept 2026, 08:5516,917+146
8 Sept 2026, 12:2016,771+149
5 Sept 2026, 06:4016,622+69
3 Sept 2026, 14:2016,553+24
2 Sept 2026, 06:5416,529+60
1 Sept 2026, 03:2716,469+62
31 Aug 2026, 02:2216,407+33
29 Aug 2026, 23:2516,374+18
29 Aug 2026, 02:0716,356+44
28 Aug 2026, 00:5416,312+51
27 Aug 2026, 03:5416,261+34
26 Aug 2026, 02:1616,227+17
25 Aug 2026, 02:5416,210+58
23 Aug 2026, 15:5316,152+32
21 Aug 2026, 23:2516,120+22
20 Aug 2026, 19:5416,098first reading

Engagement

48 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
41.1%
avg views ÷ 17,580 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,230
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 48 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held48 (1 August 20263 September 2026)
Views total144,664
Reactions total2,260
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 08s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,302 reactions across 48 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5,302100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,302 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
25
across the posts below
Posts paid on
16
of 48 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vashindaroy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 48 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 12:11 UTC≈4,090 views156 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026

Сентябрь, будь счастливым

156

31 Aug 2026, 21:09 UTC≈4,400 views84 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Это базовая настройка у всех людей, или мы только вдвоем тут чмошники?

84

31 Aug 2026, 21:08 UTC≈4,460 views87 reactionsread 3 September 2026

И даже когда я вижу, что развиваюсь и постепенно расту в своем деле, внутри все равно остается странное чувство, будто это не совсем мое и где-то существует то самое дело, которым мне действительно стоит заниматься

87

31 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC≈4,790 views107 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

107

30 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC≈5,460 views97 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @aelinark

Арабы говорят: «Кусок хлеба с миром лучше, чем мясо с тревогой» لقمة بعافية خير من لحم بوجع то есть душевный покой и безопасность в скромности ценнее богатства, отравленного постоянным стрессом и тревогой.

97

28 Aug 2026, 21:56 UTC≈6,500 views202 reactionsread 3 September 2026

человек, который довел тебя до слезного разговора с Всевышним, не имеет права знать, как твои дела

202

26 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC≈9,060 views97 reactions2 Starsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

97

24 Aug 2026, 09:21 UTC≈9,960 views160 reactions4 Starsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @ittsmr

нас было двое: я и моё желание укрепить иман, оборвать со всеми связь, поменять номер и жить тайную жизнь.

160

23 Aug 2026, 19:55 UTC≈9,970 views119 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Жил своей спокойной жизнью, а потом появляется она: на голову ниже, на шутку тупее, на язык острее, на характер капризнее, на перепад настроения чаще

119

23 Aug 2026, 14:23 UTC≈9,560 views119 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

119

23 Aug 2026, 14:22 UTC≈8,040 views76 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @haftiiy

в час, когда не осталось ни одной протянутой руки, мне хватило близости моего Господа.)

76

Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @vashindaroy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“vashtro” (@vashindaroy), 17,580 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vashindaroy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.