Я думаю, что я не привередлива Мой кофе: холодный кофе без кофе с молоком без молока, со льдом, но без льда ❤️
❤🔥15

Channel
@vashyDashy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,031subscribers
-323 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001524195055 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vashyDashy |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vashyDashy |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 19:00 | 1,031 | -4 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 11:18 | 1,035 | -7 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 06:35 | 1,042 | -6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:28 | 1,048 | -6 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 1,054 | -4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:24 | 1,058 | -6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:18 | 1,064 | -263 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 01:22 | 1,327 | -11 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:28 | 1,338 | -17 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:08 | 1,355 | -55 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:08 | 1,410 | +56 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:30 | 1,354 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 1,354 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 21 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
365 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 187 | 51.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 77 | 21.1% | |
| 🔥 | 44 | 12.1% | |
| 👍 | 31 | 8.49% | |
| 🌚 | 10 | 2.74% | |
| 😍 | 5 | 1.37% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 1.37% | |
| custom 5456145097844340698 | 3 | 0.822% | |
| ☃ | 3 | 0.822% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 365 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vashyDashy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 April 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Я думаю, что я не привередлива Мой кофе: холодный кофе без кофе с молоком без молока, со льдом, но без льда ❤️
❤🔥15
А вы не устали от work-life balance? Да, я сама была активным защитником баланса работы и личной жизни и даже проводила несколько воркшопов на эту тему. Но всегда подчёркивала, что баланс у всех разный: кто-то строго разграничивает свою жизнь по принципу 8/8/8, а кто-то готов перерабатывать на драйвовых проектах или хочет проводить больше времени с детьми 🐶 Оказывается, эпоха work-life balance подходит к концу, и е…
❤20❤🔥6👍2
Давно не было подарков? Исправляемся! 🎁 Мы (Маша и Даша) знаем, что книга – самый понятный и приятный (!) для вас подарок. Поэтому решили разыграть целых 2 книги на ваш выбор стоимостью до 1500 руб каждая. Ну вау! Подумали, а какую книгу выбрали бы мы, если победили бы в розыгрыше? Маша заказала бы «Мультипотенциалы» от Эмили Вапник (давно у меня в вишлисте!), а Даша «Критическое мышление» Тома Чатфилд. Но какую к…
❤7
- Как не бросить всё на второй неделе? - Без понятия Не помню себя долго лежащей на диване и ничего не делающей. Решила, что раз учеба закончилась, пора начинать как-то двигаться самостоятельно. Выбор пал на французский язык и исправление осанки. ☄️С французским пока всё выглядит очень красиво: занятия не меньше четырёх дней в неделю: понедельник с репетитором и три дня домашка, новые слова, что-то послушать, что-т…
❤9❤🔥8
О чем бы вам хотелось больше читать?
The shares total 193%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤4
Возвращаюсь в эфир после отпуска Что произошло за эти три недели? ✨Я получила свой красный диплом НИУ ВШЭ❤️ ✨С размахом отпраздновала своей день рождения ✨Начала вновь учить французский (долго думала межу испанским и французским и в последнюю минуту почувствовала, что мне нужен франц) ✨Отдохнула в отпуске) ну отдохнула громко сказано, но перезагрузилась точно ✨Съездила в Питер. Не была там семь лет. Кофе и ватрушки …
❤18❤🔥3🔥3
Я, как главный адепт Canva, как-то пропустила запуск Avnac. Ага, всё по классике импортозамещения. Это что-то среднее между Canva и Figma. Есть слои, есть иконки и стоковые фотки. ✨По управлению сильно легче, чем Canva и Figma, но мне маловато функций. ✨Сомнительно, но ок: все дизайн-макеты хранятся локально, и мобильная версия подкачала Для лёгких и быстрых през самое то! Но моё сердце и облако навсегда отдано C…
❤15🌚5
- Да, интересно, но я все прослушала Я больше не могу смотреть контент, который должен сделать мой успех успешнее. ✨Интервью с предпринимателями, которые смогли. ✨Подкасты про кризисы, рост и личную эффективность. ✨Эксперты, которые за час объясняют, как правильно жить, работать, строить отношения, запускать проекты и наконец-то стать лучшей версией себя. В какой-то момент всё это перестало вдохновлять и стало раз…
❤🔥16❤2🔥1😍1
Вопрос от HR: «Что вы сделаете после того, как станете частью нашей команды?» Кандидат: «Я начну оптимизацию процессов, сделаю новые чек-листы, поменяю тут и там» А может не надо? У меня долгое время тоже было дикое желание в новой команде начать все с чистого структурированного листа, но теперь мне кажется, что это не всегда нужно. Ты пришел на новое место работы и тебя буквально трясет от желания переписать все…
🔥8👍6❤5🥰2🌚1
Пропала из эфира, но причина была уважительная. На втором курсе бакалавриата моя лучшая подруга сказала: — Представляешь, как круто однажды сказать «Да, Вышка, да, с красным». Так вот 3 июля иду получать свой красный диплом Вышки. Вроде обещала себе больше — никаких красных дипломов. Но как так вышло, я без понятия ❤️
❤38👍12❤🔥6☃1🥰1
Стучу каблуками по центру Москвы. Возвращаюсь домой после открытия выставки, где представлена моя работа. Мой дебют, хоть я и считаю, что он должен был быть не таким. Эта картина станет моим синонимом слова «опыт». 🔵Лица переписывались раза четыре 🔵Я меняла концепцию по ходу развития пьесы 🔵И финалочкой стали куски неотклеющеегося золота вместо стройных и аккуратных силуэтов архитектуры Ставлю себе 3/5 и новую цель…
❤26❤🔥8custom 54561450978443406983👍2🔥2☃1
Posted without readable text
❤31❤🔥10👍5☃1🌚1🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @vashyDashy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
О чем бы вам хотелось больше читать?
The shares total 193%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Вашу ж Дашу” (@vashyDashy), 1,031 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vashyDashy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.