Channel
@vayb_pro
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,121subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002098892709 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vayb_pro |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vayb_pro |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 1,121 | +3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:56 | 1,118 | -2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 1,120 | +5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:58 | 1,115 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 1,113 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:45 | 1,112 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
13 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5407103688084838400 | 9 | 69.2% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 15.4% | |
| custom 5235728802142759605 | 1 | 7.69% | |
| custom 5355305772609708305 | 1 | 7.69% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2W5zFHDEqLm | 1 | 25 July 2026 | 25 July 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 25 July 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
https://youtu.be/RoyPHmKLsWE?is=m-jqD70YgR1-GdeI
custom 54071036880848384001
И раз уж мы сегодня чилим, вот вам ещё занимательный документальный материал про Казатип. Любопытный факт из моей карьеры - я на нём выступал от имени своего проекта Broken Stars! Блин, как же это было круто!🤪 Да, уже в новую эру, когда он ненадолго переродился в Z-City, но всё-равно амосфера и инфраструктура там прекрасно сохранились, поэтому запомнил это я на долго, там было просто офигительно! Вот немножко фото…
Photo, posted without a caption
Судя по статистике Яндекс Музыки я ярый фанат.. нет, не Транса.. да нет, не Техно!.. и не Драм энд Бэйса. Больше всего я слушаю Ambient музыку 😅 а именно композитора Jonn Serrie. Это моё средство от СДВГ, которое позволяет мне фокусироваться и выполнять работу более качественно, поэтому и звучит в моём плейлисте 24/7. Не знаю кто это такой, но дискография у него просто огромная и тянется аж с 80х. Похоже, дядя пис…
custom 54071036880848384008custom 53553057726097083051
💜 Спасибо за то, что пришли на стрим, готовьте новые треки, увидимся через месяц!
💯2
😜 Стрим стал ещё лучше, но по новой ссылке: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CwZCue8rLM4
▶️ 😉 РАЗБОРЫ ТРЕКОВ В ЭФИРЕ пока подключайтесь, начнём через 10 минут
custom 52357288021427596051
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @vayb_pro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 757,629 of 1,626,884entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ВАЙБ.ПРО - канал” (@vayb_pro), 1,121 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vayb_pro.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.