Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 💸 БЛАГІЧ 💸

Channel

💸 БЛАГІЧ 💸

@vblagich

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,307subscribers

-146 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001824679773
TypeChannel
Username@vblagich
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/vblagich

Growth

15,24715,45315,3507 August 2026 — 15,453 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,453 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,447 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,433 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,421 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,413 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,400 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,390 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,373 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,363 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,352 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,339 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,329 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,317 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,300 subscribers22 August 2026 — 15,286 subscribers24 August 2026 — 15,265 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,255 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,247 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,321 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,313 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,349 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,343 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,348 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,344 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,339 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,326 subscribers4 September 2026 — 15,307 subscribers15,3077 August 20264 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 28 days, net -146. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,216–15,484 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 07:2115,307-19
2 Sept 2026, 21:5715,326-13
1 Sept 2026, 23:1915,339-5
31 Aug 2026, 22:0515,344-4
30 Aug 2026, 22:5815,348+5
30 Aug 2026, 01:4915,343-6
29 Aug 2026, 04:2615,349+36
28 Aug 2026, 05:5315,313-8
27 Aug 2026, 07:2515,321+74
26 Aug 2026, 10:2815,247-8
25 Aug 2026, 08:3215,255-10
24 Aug 2026, 10:3415,265-21
22 Aug 2026, 15:5815,286-14
21 Aug 2026, 08:5615,300-17
20 Aug 2026, 11:1715,317-12
19 Aug 2026, 08:3615,329-10
18 Aug 2026, 11:2415,339-13
17 Aug 2026, 12:1715,352-11
16 Aug 2026, 05:2715,363-10
14 Aug 2026, 18:2315,373first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.5%
avg views ÷ 15,307 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,440
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held27 (16 July 202629 August 2026)
Views total61,920
Reactions total1,058
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,476 reactions across 27 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
52935.8%
🔥48733.0%
👍1137.66%
😍1127.59%
🤯1047.05%
💯724.88%
🏆312.10%
😱181.22%
💔70.474%
👌30.203%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,476 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 27 we hold a reading for · 22%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vblagich. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 27 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 29 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC≈1,690 views32 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026
Photo

Доброго дня https://www.instagram.com/p/DcoNIbiFxoY/?igsi=Nmh3ZWhvd3M5MzB4

24🔥5😍3

26 Aug 2026, 09:42 UTC≈3,590 views44 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Виходить, що мої витрати на весь отриманий BTC були 2513$, а я не хочу їх конвертувати в USDT Відповідно, зараз я не фіксую прибуток в моменті, але суну вниз середню ціну покупки свого бітка

27🔥9😍7👍1

26 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC≈2,790 views60 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Математика 🧮 Всі нагороди нараховувались в BTC, коли ціна була 65к$ ( зараз 79к$ ) , тому в нас гарно виріс прибуток 😋 Зроблено : 36 аккаунтів ✅ Побрили : 2 акки 💔 Вивели : 34 акки 💰 Ми максимально економні хлопці, економили практично на всьому, де могли, хоч можна було й ще дешевше робити, але все це займало час … Витрати : На 36 аккаунтів з кусом, випискою та оборотом в нас пішло 2513$ Вивели : 0.23 BTC, що з

39🔥13😍8

26 Aug 2026, 09:22 UTC≈2,890 views44 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Вивело останній аккаунт і на скріні можете глянути, яку сумарну суму вийшло заробити 🤝 В середині липня кинули погляд на роздачу ОКХ, де давали 390€ в бітку Умови були максимально прості для тих, хто хочаб на капельку вміє думати 1. ЄС 🇪🇺 KYC Тобто, укр загран + ЄС виписка з банку, оплата комуналки, інтернету чи будь-який інший варіант підтвердити адрес 2. Перший депозит Тут вже питання , бо комусь падав перший

29👍8🏆7

25 Aug 2026, 10:54 UTC≈2,920 views225 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Проте, буде не правильно сказати, що зараз немає можливості заробляти, просто всі звикли отримати готову «темку» на блюдечку та піти повторювати Все це я звів до того, що окрім Байбіту в нас зʼявилась можливість подоїти ще одну біржу і здавалось б це настільки тупа ситуація, що більшість навіть не звернули увагу, але якщо мислити трішки ширше, то гроші і можливість їх заробити Є ВСЮДИ На жаль, ми не закрили план в

🔥2109👍6

25 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTC≈3,090 views47 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Ситуація зараз така, що більшість людей просто сидять без діла і не мають чим зайнятись ( якщо ми говоримо про крипту ) На жаль, в тому є доля правди, бо «інфо простір» зараз пустий, немає звичних для всіх темок, сейлів, роздач, лістингів та й загалом якоїсь корисної інформації Вище в каналі я декілька разів палив, як ми єбали Байбіт ( кожних вихідних на декілька тисяч $ кожен ), зрозуміло, шо на паблік таке ніхто

👍29💯10🔥62

21 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC≈4,040 views58 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Намив, натер, як в старі добрі, тільки чорнила для колір не вистачає 😁😭

🔥409🏆7😍2

21 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC≈3,620 views51 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Всього за останні пів року в каналі було 5 публічних покупок BTC Я взагалі не радий, що воно росте, бо не набрав бажаний для мене сайз 💔 Сподіваюсь, буде ще багато можливостей докупити нижче

💯38🔥75👍1

20 Aug 2026, 22:42 UTC≈3,570 views45 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

До 14 січня кожного місяця буде капати ЗПшка , яку буду одразу продавати , бо не бачу сенсу холдити цей шлак Інвестував : 10к$ Отримав назад : 6.3к$ Мінус : 3.7к$ Цікаво, чи вийду я з такої мутки хочаб в мінімальний плюс 😁

32🤯6😱6👍1

20 Aug 2026, 22:39 UTC≈3,360 views49 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

В мене було 400к токенів, які моменті вартували більше 10кк$ ( хай LAB 25$ ) Зараз ціна LAB 0.09$ , тобто, мої віртуальні мільйони різко перетворились на 36к$ ( якщо дивитись на ціну, яка є сьогодні ) Прямо зараз отримав перші токени, а саме 16% від всіх токенів і зараз це вартує 6300$

🤯32😱9💔62

18 Aug 2026, 18:17 UTC≈3,270 views64 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥40😍14🏆91

17 Aug 2026, 19:26 UTC≈3,450 views43 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥28👍87

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @vblagich. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Volynblog (Луцьк•Ковель•Володимир)
@volynblog · 106,464
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“💸 БЛАГІЧ 💸” (@vblagich), 15,307 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vblagich.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.