@vejon_uz

Channel
Murodjon Normatov
@vejon_uz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
682subscribers
+28 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001281065744 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vejon_uz |
| Created | 4 June 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vejon_uz |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 09:22 | 682 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:38 | 685 | +36 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:25 | 649 | -3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:46 | 652 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:30 | 654 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 654 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
160 reactions across 16 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 46 | 28.7% | |
| 👍 | 39 | 24.4% | |
| 💯 | 16 | 10.0% | |
| ❤ | 14 | 8.75% | |
| ⚡ | 13 | 8.13% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 5.63% | |
| 👎 | 8 | 5.00% | |
| 🕊 | 8 | 5.00% | |
| 🍌 | 4 | 2.50% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.25% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.625% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 160 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Vibe coder/vibe coding degan tushunchadan voz kechish vaqti keldi. Chunki bu tushunchalar negativga o'xshab qolgan. Yana bir sababi ai orqali kod yozish 1.5 yil oldingi holatdan ancha o'zgardi, ijobiy tomonga. Mani takliflarim(bular yangilik emas, prosta shularni ishlatish tarafdoriman): - vibe engineering - ai first software engineering ... Sizda taklif bo'lsa bering! @vejon_uz
⚡9😁3👏2
Bizni regionda eng katta va eng mashhur outsource(eng obro'li it kompaniya?) aksiyalari yil boshida 220$ bo'lgan, bugunga kelib esa 86$. Ya'ni agar shu ketish bo'lsa juda ko'p xodimlarini ishdan bo'shatadi. Hurmatli dasturchilar, ishsiz qolish arafasidamiz. Bugun bir yaqin do'stim, ilgari 6 talik jamoa bilan 8 oy qiladigan ishni 4 kunda bitta o'zi qilib berganini(dasturchi emas) aytib berdi. Agar hozir Sizni ishxonan…
😁18👍10👎8🍌4❤2
Bir fikr: 2011-2012-yillarda o'zimni loyihalarimni(a.k.a. startap) qilish uchun dasturlashni o'rganishni boshlaganman. O'zini shaxsiy startapini qilmoqchi bo'lmagan yoki qilmagan dasturchi bo'lmasa kerak. Shunday ekan agar Siz, dasturchi bo'lsangiz, ertaga 27-iyun kuni bo'lib o'tadigan UzGeeks meetupiga albatta keling. Nimaga: o'zi dasturchi bo'lib, startap qilib katta kompaniya qurgan va qurayotgan, chet-el bozorlar…
🕊4🔥1
Houston, we have a problem!!! @vejon_uz
😱1
Assalom alaykum!!! UzGeeks'da Startup kuni! 📆 27-iyun, shanba kuni Toshkent shahri Raqamli texnologiyalar vazirligi binosida "UzGeeks June2026 Startup Day Meetup" bo'lib o'tadi. Ushbu tadbirda speakerlarimiz: 1️⃣ Startaper bo'la ko'rmang! - Umid Gafurov (Founder @ tirikchilik.uz, troll.uz) 2️⃣ Qanday qilib dasturchilikdan Startupperlikka o'tish mumkin? - Orzumurod Parmonov (Founder @ pDaftar.uz) 3️⃣ Davron Parmonov…
IIV Akademiyasi. 2026 @vejon_uz
👍3
Prezidentimiz Namangan viloyatida IT-park qurilishini boshlab berdi va yangi loyihalarga start berdi. — Президент нашей страны дал старт строительству IT-парка и новым проектам в Наманганской области. Telegram | Facebook | Instagram | Youtube | LinkedIn | X
👍1🕊1
Rahimjon akani 10 yildan beri taniman. Kamida 15 yillik dasturchilar. Juda tajribali mutaxassis. Bir narsani bilmasalar gapirishmaydi. @vejon_uz
😁4👍3
Yuz @vejon_uz
💯7👍2
Qozoq internetida yosh shaxmatchi qiz Bibisara Asaubayeva bilan bog’liq xabarlar ko’p chiqyapti. Gapni qisqasi davlat tomonidan unga oylik kam to’lanayotgani bo’yicha Prezidentiga murojaat yo’llagan. Vazirlik, federatsiyadan noligan. Gapim yoqmasligi mumkin, lekin shu shaxmatdan qanday foyda tushunmayman(aynan davlat darajasida). Vaqt o’tkazish uchun o’ynash - ha zo’r, aqliy rivojlanish uchun - ha zo’r, xalqaro tan…
💯9👍4❤1
Buglar umrimi yedi. @vejon_uz
😁9🕊1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vejon_uz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Sizning tashkilotingizda kod yozishda ai'dan foydalanishga ruxsat berishganmi? @vejon_uz
- Ha64%
- Yo'q4%
- Qisman18%
- Dasturchi emasman13%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 24 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@yetimdasturchi · 36,476
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Murodjon Normatov” (@vejon_uz), 682 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vejon_uz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.