Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for VELRE_Z (Вэл)

Channel

VELRE_Z (Вэл)

@velre_zz

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

875subscribers

+165 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001966129431
TypeChannel
Username@velre_zz
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/velre_zz

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

710875792.57 August 2026 — 710 subscribers7 August 2026 — 710 subscribers8 August 2026 — 716 subscribers16 August 2026 — 766 subscribers22 August 2026 — 796 subscribers30 August 2026 — 814 subscribers9 September 2026 — 828 subscribers18 September 2026 — 875 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 42 days, net +165. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 685–900 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 10:39875+47
9 Sept 2026, 16:36828+14
30 Aug 2026, 19:58814+18
22 Aug 2026, 22:21796+30
16 Aug 2026, 04:56766+50
8 Aug 2026, 03:51716+6
7 Aug 2026, 06:32710no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:18710first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,409 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
57240.6%
❤‍🔥44331.4%
custom 532330294908501568217212.2%
custom 532348888680919403015210.8%
🔥372.63%
🎉161.14%
💋130.923%
😭30.213%
👎10.071%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,409 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 10 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @velre_zz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC354 views117 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Слишком неловкая ситуация в жизни Саши #изголовы 🎀 Он спокойно с наслаждением отсасывает Мише, и в какой-то момент что-то щелкает. Он отстраняется с жуткой болью в челюсти справа, пытается закрыть рот, но не может🤩 🎀 Миша ничего не понял. Саша резко отстранился, смотрит на него с широко раскрытыми испуганными глазами, и держит рот открытым. Миша сначала хотел сказать, что, нет, Саш, я ещё не близко, пока что не мог

❤‍🔥8123🔥12🎉1

6 Aug 2026, 11:21 UTC371 views94 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Индивидуальный опыт: смотришь видео по Наруто, но ПВЛ держит тебя за ручку

❤‍🔥7511🔥7🎉1

5 Aug 2026, 21:43 UTC444 views151 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Хэд, что многие москвята учатся в МГУ за баснословные бабки, по большей части ебланят, преподы относятся к ним лояльно, потому что какой-то дядя сверху сказал, что этим ребятам надо выдать дипломы с отличием. Нет, конечно, есть те, кто старается, есть те, кто опаздывает по дедлайнам, но сдает, есть Даня... #изголовы

107❤‍🔥27custom 532330294908501568213🎉3custom 53234888868091940301

5 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC430 views118 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вообще можно мне какой-то кринжометр с красной отметкой, ограничивающей, что Саша бы делал, а что нет. Просто реально у меня бывает столько хэдов, потом я думаю, нет, это кринж, Саша серьезный человек, он бы этим не занимался, но потом я вижу этот хэд у кого-то и думаю, что это вполне обоснованно, и Саша ебаный кринж

88❤‍🔥16💋9🎉4👎1

5 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC435 views126 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Какова вероятность, что Саша читал некоторые фанфики с историческими наклонностями? Типа я не в состоянии измерить уровень кринжа Саши, и я периодически не понимаю, насколько я перегибаю, думая, что Саша мог бы пару раз прочитать что-то про каких-нибудь императоров? или Франция и РИ? или Москва и Питер? И он типа был бы самым ужасным критиком, который воспринял бы все серьезно, и сказал, что вообще-то🤓☝️ все было не

102❤‍🔥13🔥6🎉3💋2

4 Aug 2026, 21:52 UTC432 views119 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Если бы Саша любил спорт, то он бы вайбил теми самыми женщинами, которые ходят на групповые занятия в зале и под музыку летают на резинках, подвешенных к потолку👁️ Или групповые занятия йогой, прыганье на специальных батутах или занятия с огромным мячом

85custom 532330294908501568216🔥11❤‍🔥6custom 53234888868091940301

4 Aug 2026, 17:43 UTC456 views129 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Один раз Саша сходил с Мишей в зал и вот он уже готов переделать планировку свой квартиры, чтобы выделить место для турничка и некоторых тренажеров💥 #мысли 🎀Дело в том, что смотреть, как Миша подтягивается, это одно из успокоительных Романова (помимо приседаний и ягодичного мостика Миши). Если другие бесконечно могут смотреть на огонь, воду и что-то там ещё, то Саша - на Мишу в зале💪 🎀Миша подтягивается. О да, эти

custom 532330294908501568280❤‍🔥24custom 5323488886809194030159🎉1

3 Aug 2026, 19:46 UTC469 views163 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Саша делает тортики🌟 #мысли 🍰 Он занялся этим, когда увидел рилс, как кто-то на прикольной крутящейся штуке намазывает кремом коржы и красиво украшает разными съедобными штуками. Конечно, Саша сразу понял, что умеет также. 🎂 Итак. Он начал с нуля. Купил все необходимое и даже больше. У многих крутых кондитеров нет таких прикольных насадок для выдавливания крема, какие были у Саши, когда он не умел делать тортики🤩

108❤‍🔥31custom 532330294908501568216custom 53234888868091940305💋2🎉1

2 Aug 2026, 21:03 UTC575 views194 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#балуюсь 5 Что-то мне заняться нечем...

❤‍🔥13530custom 532330294908501568223custom 53234888868091940305🎉1

2 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC529 views198 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#балуюсь 4 Ребята, чем меньше вы пишете странного спама, тем счастливее автор❤️

custom 5323488886809194030125❤‍🔥35custom 5323302949085015682249😭3🎉1🔥1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @velre_zz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“VELRE_Z (Вэл)” (@velre_zz), 875 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/velre_zz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.