Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
5 measurements spanning 34 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 467–477 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Sept 2026, 23:56
469
+1
2 Sept 2026, 22:14
468
-4
21 Aug 2026, 18:17
472
-4
8 Aug 2026, 04:35
476
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:43
476
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
137 reactions across 15 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
137
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 137 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @venividiamavii. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
И вся эта страшная перемена совершилась с ним только оттого, что он перестал верить себе, а стал верить другим. Перестал же он верить себе, а стал верить другим потому, что жить, веря себе, было слишком трудно: веря себе, всякий вопрос надо решать всегда не в пользу своего животного я, ищущего легких радостей, а почти всегда против него; веря же другим, решать нечего было, все уже было решено, и решено было всегда пр…
лучше , чем это … пока не придумали 👌🏻 я сбилась со счету , которая уже баночка идет в расход
просто люблю эксперименты
но уже планирую остановиться 😂
единственное , что я еще хочу попробовать — это спрей от gisou но предварительно надо будет проверить его на силиконы .. хоть это и не в их стиле
на часах 2 ночи , я занимаюсь разбором составов ухода для волос 😂 причина , по которой я чуть не убилась на паркете , обнаружена …
пересекающиеся в составе компоненты отправила на анализ в Claude и вуаля
«Риск для гладких поверхностей (кафель, эмаль ванны, кухонный пол и т.п.) создают именно силиконы — диметикон и циклопентасиликон. Если средство попадёт на пол, эти компоненты формируют трудноудаляемую скользкую пл…
upd: хочу предупредить прекрасных дам
несмывашка на фото , если вы пшикаете стоя на паркете или ламинате , при попадании на пол засыхает и делает покрытие оооочень скользким (!)
проверено !😆
такая же история кстати говоря и с несмывашкой от hadat 😆
вы думали , что все это реклама ?
а вот и нет
честно скажу , я тоже последнее время слишком часто видела упоминания этих продуктов … и подозревала какой-то подвох )
но ! на деле баночки от embrace оказались очень приятными ) волосы мягкие , запах вкусный и общее впечатление максимально положительное
спасибо моим девочкам за стратегический запас ухода 😁🤍
до этого я брала hadat
совершенно мимо ..
запах как у мужског…
пообщались с Заирой о книгах, их экранизациях и немного об искусстве ✨
я не знала , о чем меня будут спрашивать .. поэтому забыла русский язык 😆 так что строго не судите, подпищички мои дорогие 🥹♥️😂
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @venividiamavii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“veni.vidi.amavi” (@venividiamavii), 469 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/venividiamavii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.