Channel
@verifiedairdrop11144
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,820subscribers
-21 since we began measuring on 2 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001051435207 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @verifiedairdrop11144 |
| Created | Between 1 May 2016 and 28 February 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 2 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/verifiedairdrop11144 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 23:38 | 2,820 | -7 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 14:59 | 2,827 | +1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 16:00 | 2,826 | -12 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:36 | 2,838 | -3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:15 | 2,841 | no change |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:01 | 2,841 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 19 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (19 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,210 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 11:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
13 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 69.2% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 15.4% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 15.4% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 19 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚨 Just bought YT STRCx on Pendle at 29% Implied APY. 👀I’m guessing the APY won’t drop much from here 👀 My strategy: 💰 Collect the dividends ⚡ Farm early points + boost ⏳ Exit before 2–3 weeks of the period ends The earlier you enter, the more time you have to cover any potential loss — and potentially end up with profit + points. I did the same last period and made a profit while farming millions of points. 🤝 🎯…
Signed Kishan Das
🔥$2M committed just 12 hours into the $WHUF sale! 🔗Complete sonar verification before joining the sale sale.ethos.network/Y4T4DZF ✔️ 85% of participants have already bid at the max price of $9.90/WHUF → $99M FDV. ✔️ Bid at the max: $9.90 ✔️ I personally bid $2K at the max price ✔️ Bidding at max should give a better chance of getting an allocation ✔️You can withdraw your funds anytime So far, the hype around t…
Signed Kishan Das
🌋 $WHUF Token Sale will be LIVE today @ethos_network is launching a 20% token sale through an English Auction 👀 🪙 Supply: 10M 🪙 Sale: 2M (20%) 💵 Starting FDV: $1M 🚀 Max FDV: $99M 💸 Min bid: $100 ⛓️ Base | USDC 📅 Sept 1–4 🎯 TGE: Sept 8 ✅ Complete sonar verification before joining the sale https://sale.ethos.network/Y4T4DZF 🛡️ The interesting part: Price Guarantee Vouch your tokens within 30 days after TGE and y…
Signed Kishan Das
🔔Bought 108 YT STRCx at 27% Implied APY on Exponent 👀 Why Exponent? ✔️ 2× xStock Points ✔️ Easier dividend eligibility — just hold YT STRCx before the snapshot. No weighted-average holding time like Pendle. ✔️ Potential future upside — Exponent doesn't have a token yet ☺️ 🔗Buy YT STRCX ON Exponent app.exponent.finance/en Exponent is built on Solana, so make sure your Solana wallet is connected to the xStocks we…
Signed Kishan Das
🔔Check 25$ Rcvd in baseapp
Signed Kishan Das
👍1M points achieved on Pixie Chess ♟️ Are you guys playing 🎴 ▶️I m playing daily (around 20 games per day )
❤2
Signed Kishan Das
🔔The new xStocks YT pool on pendle is live ℹ️Currently Implied apy is high 28% , try putting limit order around 20%-22% to get more YT STRCx 🔗New Pool Link If you are New on Xstocks follow the steps to earn Xstocks points. ➡️Earlier guide My Expectations 1M points= ~1K$ ‼️ Reveal Boost daily to get extra points daily
Signed Kishan Das
🔔Termax Booster Campaign update 📌Users can now Check Rewads Status Not Eligible Or Pending TGE..??👀
Signed Kishan Das
My honest opinion 👇 Reaching the Top 1K is really hard, so feel free to skip if you want. But if you want to support me, a vouch would be greatly appreciated ❤️ Just connect your X here: 🔗 commonsmade.com/vouch Then comment on this➡️ post: 👉 Hey @commonsmade i vouch for @Legit_Airdrops0 Appreciate everyone who supports! 🤝 By the way i will remember all who will support me ❤️
❤2
Signed Kishan Das
🚀 @commonsmade #Airdrop Guide It is a reputation-based social coordination platform where your score determines your share of the airdrop. Your base score comes from your Ethos + GitHub reputation. You can increase it through vouches or decrease others’ scores through slashes. 🔗 commonsmade.com/vouch Steps: Link your X + GitHub Give/receive up to 5 vouches & 5 slashes Each vouch adds 35% of your base score to th…
❤2
Signed Kishan Das
💥GTE Waitlist! Reserve Your Name & Claim free points 💵Raised $25.94M funds from Paradigm & more top investors. 🔗Join waitlist with Mail https://waitlist.gte.xyz/r/TH5GY ✔️Enter Email ~ Verify & Skip Intro ✔️Reserve Unique Username ✔️Connect Ur X & Instagram Account ✔️Claim Free Points (Done)
🔥2
Signed Kishan Das
🔔$ALIGN Claim live 🔗 https://airdrop.alignedlayer.com/ ✔️Above 10k claim on eth under 10k claim on base
👍2
Signed Kishan Das
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @verifiedairdrop11144. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“100% verified Airdrops” (@verifiedairdrop11144), 2,820 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/verifiedairdrop11144.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.