5 measurements spanning 14 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,272–1,288 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Aug 2026, 18:53
1,274
-5
25 Aug 2026, 10:24
1,279
-2
19 Aug 2026, 11:48
1,281
-4
16 Aug 2026, 17:38
1,285
-1
15 Aug 2026, 04:31
1,286
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 12 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 37s
Average length
24s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
74 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
27
36.5%
🔥
23
31.1%
❤
10
13.5%
🥰
10
13.5%
🤔
2
2.70%
🤝
1
1.35%
🤮
1
1.35%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 12 January 2024 to 5 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
استغاثة من واقع الفساد الى كل الشرفاء.
محافظ ذي قار يشترى ذمم اعضاء مجلس المحافظة ورئيس المجلس مقابل قطع اراضي
باشر محافظ ذي قار مرتضى عبود ورئيس المجلس عزة الناشي بشراء ثمانية اعضاء من مجلس المحافظ ؟؟'
وذلك بتنظيم محضر لهم لكل عضو منهم لهُ عشرة قطع بمقاطعه واحده سعر القطعه 100 مليون بترتيب مع مدير البلدية المهندس المحكوم على الفساد قحطان مقابل عدم التصويت على الاقاله او لاستجواب للمحافظ ورئيس المجلس ومدير البلدية و…
من دواعي الاستغراب وسوء التقدير ان يتم اختيار محافظ لـ ذي قار كان معقب معاملات !
وكان سمسير معامل الطابوق ونسونجي درجة اولى.
المحزن انه ينتمي الى عشيرة عريقة ولها مواقف مشرفة
وكذلك جاء مرشح تيار ينتمي الى عائلة عليمة وقدمت خيرة أبنائها شهداء وهذا الاختيار لا يقل عن انتكاسة اختيار يحيى الناصري الذي سار في نفس الطريق ونفس المنهج.
وكانت العاقبة سيئة جداً
مجلس محافظة ذي قار يبدأ جلسة استجواب المحافظ مرتضى الإبراهيمي بحضور 11 عضوا
🔥1🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @vgvrt_RT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
العراق نيوز @hhhhhh7773 · 34,023 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 3 September 2026
تجمع الحشد الشعبـــي @alhahdalshpe · 37,339 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 1 September 2026
الإعلامية شيماء الخزعلي @gh13eh4 · 106,208 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“حوري بنت الناصرية” (@vgvrt_RT), 1,274 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vgvrt_RT.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.