Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Виктор Юкечев / О том и речь

Channel

Виктор Юкечев / О том и речь

@vic_yukech_1

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

146subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001525267743
TypeChannel
Username@vic_yukech_1
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 March 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 October 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 22 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/vic_yukech_1

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 7 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

145146145.510 August 2026 — 145 subscribers10 August 2026 — 145 subscribers7 October 2026 — 146 subscribers10 August 20267 October 2026
3 measurements spanning 58 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 145–146 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Oct 2026, 22:39146+1
10 Aug 2026, 16:45145no change
10 Aug 2026, 16:31145first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 May 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

70 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2637.1%
🔥2130.0%
👍1724.3%
😢22.86%
❤‍🔥11.43%
👎11.43%
👏11.43%
😁11.43%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 May 2023 to 22 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Jun 2026, 14:05 UTC52 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @YMDPSFk6aGw0M2U0

Как заставить государство исполнять свои обязательства по обеспечению прав человека. Что остается от прав человека, когда государство объявляет приоритетом "суверенитет", а свобода слова превращается в повод для уголовного дела? Совместный проект адвокатов и судебных журналистов пытается ответить не только на этот вопрос. Мы составили карту современной российской правовой реальности: от законов о "дискредитации" и …

👍5

8 Jun 2026, 18:45 UTC92 viewsread 10 August 2026

https://www.facebook.com/https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10201115832377265&set=a.3321428813870&type=3

8 Jun 2026, 18:45 UTC94 viewsread 10 August 2026

Шутки в сторону. Читатель всерьез интересуется.

8 Jun 2026, 18:32 UTC90 viewsread 10 August 2026

https://www.facebook.com/1520261393/posts/pfbid02uPTd3ofQzi6sSTXGtJBozTAxDzXFEAE2CALxZcMdB6M8duqrYD67mxXLhPerxbGUl/?d=n

8 Jun 2026, 18:32 UTC93 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Прошло два года. А герой наш все еще репетирует: «Одержим победу, к тебе я приеду на горячем вороном коне».

👏1

20 May 2026, 14:51 UTC165 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Как заставить государство обеспечивать права человека – Telegraph

🔥4❤‍🔥1👍1

13 May 2026, 18:04 UTC152 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

В России, кажется, очередное ЧП: Роскомнадзор может блокировать сайты, ссылаясь на отсутствующее Чрезвычайное положение Пользователи столкнулись с ситуацией, когда ограничение доступа к интернет-ресурсу может ограничиваться на основании не вступившего в силу закона. Сайт проекта In Fact (https://in-fact.org/) не открывается при попытке доступа с российских IP-адресов. При проверке на сервисе Роскомнадзора (https://…

👍1🔥1

10 Mar 2026, 10:09 UTC144 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @YMDPSFk6aGw0M2U0

Убьёт ли ИИ журналистику? Мнение эксперта проекта "In Fact". Появление генеративного искусственного интеллекта вызвало в медиаиндустрии волну тревоги и споров. Главный вопрос звучит предельно просто: заменит ли ИИ журналистов? Однако, как утверждает независимый IT-консультант Алексей Шляпужников, изначально неверна. По мнению эксперта, искусственный интеллект не уничтожит профессию, но радикально изменит саму структ…

🔥3👍2

25 Feb 2026, 14:49 UTC138 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @YMDPSFk6aGw0M2U0

Дело Дарьи Козыревой: нарушителем оказался суд. Уголовное дело 19-летней студентки из Санкт-Петербурга Дарьи Козыревой, обвинённой в "дискредитации" российской армии, стало одним из самых громких в прошлом году. Девушку приговорили к двум годам и восьми месяцам колонии за то, что она наклеила на памятник Тарасу Шевченко листок с цитатой из его стихотворения и дала интервью изданию "Север.Реалии", в котором назвала в…

❤5

25 Feb 2026, 14:44 UTC99 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @YMDPSFk6aGw0M2U0

Дело Европейского университета: как научный доклад о рисках для правосудия обернулся наказанием во имя его защиты. 17 июля 2025 года Смольнинский районный суд Санкт-Петербурга оштрафовал Европейский университет на 250 тысяч рублей по статье 20.3.1 КоАП РФ ("возбуждение ненависти и вражды, а равно унижение человеческого достоинства"). Поводом для этого послужил размещённый на сайте университета отчёт "Как и кем твори…

👍4

24 Feb 2026, 18:05 UTC92 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

https://telegra.ph/Illyuzionizm-i-ehffekt-bumeranga-Ili-kratkaya-istoriya-samo-diskreditacii-02-24

❤3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vic_yukech_1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Виктор Юкечев / О том и речь” (@vic_yukech_1), 146 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vic_yukech_1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.